sigC Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv2069 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002203 ·
185 aa ·
2355557–2356114 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_216585.1
- Both statements stand. UniProt labels this protein "Evidence at protein level", a curator's judgement whose basis (mass spectrometry, structure, antibody, Edman sequencing) this atlas does not record; PaxDb counts detections in 16 aggregated mass-spectrometry datasets and none detects it, which is not evidence of absence. Translation is also attested independently of mass spectrometry: Smith et al. 2022 (eLife) list it among the putative leaderless ORFs. This shows that the ORF is translated, not that a stable protein accumulates. An experimental structure exists in the PDB (2O7G, 2O8X); it shows that the protein can be produced and folded, not that it is expressed in M. tuberculosis under the conditions of the 16 datasets. The UniProt entry carries 6 annotation(s) with experimental support from 4 publications; this atlas has not checked whether any of them measures the protein itself. (uniprot protein level vs ms undetected, 2026-10-09)
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigC |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | RNA polymerase sigma factor SigC |
| Revised (this work) | RNA polymerase sigma factor SigC. Pfam: Sigma70_r2 (PF04542.21), Sigma70_ECF (PF07638.18), Sigma70_r4_2 (PF08281.19), Sigma70_r4 (PF04545.23). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | information pathways |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 19 publications
19 TB publications mention this gene. 19 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 15 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 5 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 5-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (4), M. leprae (1), M. marinum (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| Modular toolkit to facilitate molecular manipulations in mycobacteria. doi:10.1128/jb.00474-25 | 2026 |
| Divergent transcriptional regulation of redox-homeostasis and permeability modulate rifampicin tolerance and sensitivity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67152-2 | 2025 |
| Mycobacterium leprae hsp18 promoter-EGFP transcriptional fusion construct: Environmental stress and strain-specific expression. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2022.147034 | 2023 |
| A Role for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Sigma Factor C in Copper Nutritional Immunity. doi:10.3390/ijms22042118 | 2021 |
| Distribution of sigma factors delineates segregation of virulent and avirulent Mycobacterium. doi:10.1007/s00203-020-02172-8 | 2021 |
18 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 19 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)
Searched as: Rv2069, sigC, Mb2095, ML1448, MMAR_3051, MAB_3428c
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) antiparallel · 2 % of gene
| Neighbour | cobK (Rv2070c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 11 bp, 2 % of this gene's length |
antiparallel overlap: this gene may inherit essentiality/conservation signal from its neighbour through shared TA sites or promoter constraint, without any protein of its own being produced (cf. Rv2438A/nadE) Signals attributed to this gene (Tn-seq essentiality via shared TA sites, conservation via promoter constraint) should be cross-checked against the neighbour before being read as its own. P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Blal (blaI).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.82 (95% CI -0.33 to 2.62). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.399 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=5 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Involved in promoter recognition, transcription initiation. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2095
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML1448
· 81.7% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_3051
· 83.5% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002141
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_3428c
· 62.8% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WGH1
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigC |
| Curated function | Sigma factors are initiation factors that promote the attachment of RNA polymerase to specific initiation sites and are then released. Extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors are usually held in an inactive form by an anti-sigma factor until released by regulated intramembrane proteolysis; this sigma factor does not seem to have a cognate anti-sigma factor however. It has been suggested that the sigma domains 2 and 4 may interact via polar residues in this protein to autoregulate. Positively regulates expression of a small regulon of genes. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
K Transcription
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | sigC |
| eggNOG description | Belongs to the sigma-70 factor family. ECF subfamily |
| Orthologous group | COG1595 |
| KEGG orthology |
K03088
|
| Gene Ontology (36) |
GO:0001101, GO:0001666, GO:0006355, GO:0006950, GO:0008150, GO:0009266, GO:0009405, GO:0009408, GO:0009410, GO:0009415, GO:0009628, GO:0009889 +24 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
undefined (dS = 0) (low power)
· 1 consensus substitution(s) low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 78.1%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 9/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 43.8% detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
9 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
9 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 101.222222222.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
8 of these 9 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 1 of this ORF's 9 TA sites lies inside Rv2070c (1 site), leaving 8 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 8 exclusive sites. |
| Caveat | Read with some caution: only 9 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 9 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| fitness after prolonged in vitro passage (in vitro passage) | -6.51 | 0.0026 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -3.25 | 0.045 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) | -1.92 | 0.044 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 3 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected
Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 185 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 20.0 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 5.94 |
| GRAVY | -0.084 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 95.1 |
| Aromaticity | 0.049 |
| Instability index | 26.2 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sigma70_r2 | PF04542.21 | 6.4e-15 | 30–93 | Sigma-70 region 2 |
Sigma70_ECF | PF07638.18 | 8.6e-05 | 53–174 | ECF sigma factor |
Sigma70_r4_2 | PF08281.19 | 4.7e-16 | 122–174 | Sigma-70, region 4 |
Sigma70_r4 | PF04545.23 | 8.9e-06 | 128–174 | Sigma-70, region 4 |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
Experimental structure 2o7g (PDBe), the strongest available structural
evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default)
shown as sticks.
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 2 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
2o7g |
X-ray diffraction | 2.7 Å | 60% |
2o8x |
X-ray diffraction | 3.0 Å | 37% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (2 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 86.0
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2o7g-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.99 | 0.46 | 0.97 | 100% | 46% / 98% | 1.8e-08 sig | 2o7g-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the Pribnow Box recognition region of SigC from Mycobacterium tuberculosis |
5wur-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 22% | 91% / 97% | 1.9e-07 sig | 5wur-assembly1_A Crystal structure of SigW in complex with its anti-sigma RsiW, an oxdized form |
4cxf-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 29% | 92% / 99% | 2.7e-07 sig | 4cxf-assembly1_A Structure of CnrH in complex with the cytosolic domain of CnrY |
5wur-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 22% | 91% / 97% | 3.3e-07 sig | 5wur-assembly2_B Crystal structure of SigW in complex with its anti-sigma RsiW, an oxdized form |
5wuq-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 22% | 92% / 95% | 2.0e-07 sig | 5wuq-assembly1_A Crystal structure of SigW in complex with its anti-sigma RsiW, a zinc binding form |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 86.0, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | blaC (- strand, 134 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | cobK (- strand, -11 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2129) |
expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 25.36)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 19.22) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE) transcription factor
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
blaI (represses)
|
|---|---|
| Regulon | this transcription factor regulates 11 target gene(s) |
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0093c (membrane protein), high confidence (score 891, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 28 partners at medium confidence (8 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 28 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0093c |
membrane protein | 891 | 891 ctx | fusion:734 cooccurence:462 |
Rv3223c sigH |
ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigH | 939 | 752 ctx | cooccurence:752 textmining:766 |
Rv3911 sigM |
ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigM | 903 | 704 ctx | cooccurence:702 textmining:687 |
Rv2068c blaC |
beta-lactamase | 663 | 655 ctx | neighborhood:589 |
Rv0735 sigL |
ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigL | 945 | 628 ctx | cooccurence:627 textmining:859 |
Rv2067c |
hypothetical protein | 556 | 556 ctx | neighborhood:550 |
Rv3221A rshA |
anti-sigma factor RshA | 580 | 484 | |
Rv0736 rslA |
anti-sigma-L factor RslA | 515 | 484 | |
Rv1222 rseA |
anti-sigma E factor RseA | 558 | 473 | |
Rv0668 rpoC exp (transferred) |
DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta' | 486 | 457 | experimental:456 |
Rv0667 rpoB exp (transferred) |
DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta | 482 | 454 | experimental:451 |
Rv3457c rpoA exp (transferred) |
DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit alpha | 465 | 436 | experimental:431 |
Rv1390 rpoZ exp (transferred) |
DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit omega | 462 | 433 | experimental:431 |
Rv3909 dark |
hypothetical protein | 417 | 418 | |
Rv3372 otsB2 |
trehalose 6-phosphate phosphatase | 412 | 413 | coexpression:413 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigC
- MTBC0 PGAP product: RNA polymerase sigma factor SigC
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Sigma70_r2 PF04542.21 (E=6e-15), Sigma70_ECF PF07638.18 (E=9e-05), Sigma70_r4_2 PF08281.19 (E=5e-16), Sigma70_r4 PF04545.23 (E=9e-06)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216585.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Sigma70_r2 (PF04542.21), Sigma70_ECF (PF07638.18), Sigma70_r4_2 (PF08281.19), Sigma70_r4 (PF04545.23)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG1595 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WGH1 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 86.0)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
28 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv0093c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002203|Rv2069|sigC MTATASDDEAVTALALSAAKGNGRALEAFIKATQQDVWRFVAYLSDVGSADDLTQETFLRAIGAIPRFSARSSARTWLLAIARHVVADHIRHVRSRPRTTRGARPEHLIDGDRHARGFEDLVEVTTMIADLTTDQREALLLTQLLGLSYADAAAVCGCPVGTIRSRVARARDALLADAEPDDLTG
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for sigC? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about sigC