Rv2082 Family assigned · medium

H37Rv Rv2082 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002218 · 721 aa · 2367322–2369487 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_216598.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDUF5631 domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)C-terminal region (residues ~500-720 of 721) matches, essentially full-length (221/227 columns), the paralogous M. tuberculosis structure Rv3899c (PDB 5IMU, DUF5631/DUF5632 family) at Probability 100% and E=9.7e-77 -- a confident within-species paralogue match, not an external family. Assigns Rv2082 to the same uncharacterised DUF5631/DUF5632 family as Rv3899c, whose structure is published but whose molecular function is itself unknown (family_assigned, not requalified). N-terminal hits (PPE-family proteins, ESX-1/WXG100 secretion-associated hits, residues ~26-180) are all sub-significant (E>=0.87) and not retained -- consistent with known PE/PPE structural promiscuity, not a genuine domain assignment.
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) variant mention only

1 TB publication mentions this gene. Appears in the TB literature ONLY as a variant in a genomic / drug-resistance screen (in vitro bedaquiline/clofazimine exposure variants); no functional content — do not over-interpret. reformulation, not a quotation

1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2082, Mb2108, MMAR_3066 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Emergence of Canonical and Noncanonical Genomic Variants following In Vitro Exposure of Clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains to Bedaquiline or Clofazimine. doi:10.1128/aac.01368-22 Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2023

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) dark by construction (IDR-orphan)

Predicted disorder50% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 68.2
Disordered regions2 IDR(s), longest 333 aa [0-25, 178-511]

both sequence (metapredict) and structure (low AlphaFold pLDDT) indicate little stable globular structure: this gene is dark BY CONSTRUCTION — there is no confident fold for structure/homology search to match, so its obscurity is expected, not a pipeline failure

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

How to read this gene's constraint (qualifying attributes, not exclusions) MEDIUM

Clonal disruptionCarries a clonal disruption in a MINORITY of strains (the 1-50 % window). This is a signal of pseudogenisation UNDER WAY in one clone or lineage, not a verdict on the gene: it is intact, and often translated and constrained, in the rest of the complex. It does not exclude the gene from curation.
Frame disrupted in 4.1 % of strains, i.e. intact in 95.9 %.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourRv2083 (Rv2083, + strand)
Overlap4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.99 (95% CI -0.76 to 3.89). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.298 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=9 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2108 · 99.6% identity
M. marinum MMAR_3066 · 50.8% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002151 · 77.6% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt Q10690 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv2082

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv2082; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

Orthologous group2A1TI
Gene Ontology (33) GO:0002682, GO:0002684, GO:0008150, GO:0009605, GO:0009607, GO:0035821, GO:0043207, GO:0044003, GO:0044403, GO:0044419, GO:0048518, GO:0048583 +21 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS 1.062 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 5 synonymous, 14 missense, 0 nonsense, 3 frameshift
Disruption 3 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 4.22% of strains (6012) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Bovis, Caprae_La2, L4; union over all sites: 7 417 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:2339947:G:GC · frameshift · 6 012 strains — fixed in 6 sub-clades of Bovis, L4, totalling 2 167 strains — 3.2% of the 67 725 strains in the lineages named (largest: L4.2.1 939/1397, L4.2.1.1 351/510, L4.2.1.2 135/188, Bovis.2.1.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2 29/41, Bovis.2.1.2.2.2.2.2.2.1.2.2.1 15/20, Bovis.2.1.2.2.2.2.2.2.1.1.2 9/11)
  • NC_000962.3:2339947:G:GCC · frameshift · 898 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of Bovis, totalling 9 strains — 0.1% of the 13 187 strains in the lineage named (largest: Bovis.2.1.2.2.2.2.2.2.1.2.1 5/9)
  • NC_000962.3:2339947:GC:G · frameshift · 507 strains — fixed in 6 sub-clades of Bovis, Caprae_La2, totalling 123 strains — 0.9% of the 13 465 strains in the lineages named (largest: Caprae_La2.2.2.2 52/53, Caprae_La2.2.2.3 36/36, Bovis.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1.1.1 14/14, Bovis.2.3.1.2 7/8, Bovis.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.1 6/6, Bovis.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1.2 6/6)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Lineage-specific relaxation (candidate, one evidence handle) 1 lineage(s)

L4 disrupted in 11.8% of 55 563 L4 strains, vs 4.1% pooled across the whole MTBC (145k strains) · odds ratio 11.03 · FDR q=0.0

Candidate lineage-specific loss-of-function signal: rare/absent in the other well-sampled lineages (<5%) but risen in the listed lineage(s). ONE handle, not a verdict change (P8 two-handle policy) -- the general phenomenon of lineage-specific gene loss reflecting ecotype-specific selective pressure is already established at genome scale (Silva-Pereira et al. 2024); this signal on an individual dark gene needs an independent second handle before any requalification.

Caveat: Sample-size heterogeneity across MTBC lineages (up to 4 orders of magnitude, 16 smaller lineages excluded for n<500); essentiality is NOT resolvable per lineage (TnSeq data is H37Rv-only). For the two smallest adequate lineages (L5 n=630, L6 n=1364) the frequency floor bottoms out at the absolute minimum of 3 carrier strains -- a handful of strains from a SINGLE transmission cluster (clonal outbreak) can pass this floor without representing independent evolutionary origins of the disrupting allele; no phylogenetic correction for clonal sampling was applied. Treat low-count hits in these two lineages with extra caution.

Reference: Silva-Pereira TT, Soler-Camargo NC, Sá Guimarães AM 2024, Microbiology Spectrum, doi:10.1128/spectrum.02289-23

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.348 · 23 consensus substitution(s)
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.348) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 0/53 (0%) · 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives
NOT MTBC-specific despite passing the strict presence filter: no hit at pident>=30 & qcov>=50 across the 53 non-MTBC genomes, BUT sub-threshold tblastn hit(s) exist (M_lacus:74.3id/38cov;n=48;mtbap=4) — the gene is PRESENT BUT DIVERGENT in at least one non-MTBC Mycobacterium, not a genus-level innovation. Do not frame as MTBC-specific nor as a host-adaptation factor. Human non-homology, if needed, must be established directly (BLASTp vs human proteome), never inferred from this field.
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 38 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 38 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.974, mean read count 187.324324324. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 38 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 9 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance26.0 ppm · rank 2158/3519 (38.7th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (1 TM helix)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)1

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length721 aa
Molecular weight74.0 kDa
Theoretical pI6.28
GRAVY-0.234 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index75.2
Aromaticity0.032
Instability index59.1 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DUF5632PF18646.7 1.0e-30511–593 Family of unknown function (DUF5632)
DUF5631PF18645.7 6.4e-40619–713 Family of unknown function (DUF5631)

HHpred profile-profile: top hits 5IMU_A M. tuberculosis Rv3899c paralogue, DUF5631/DUF5632 family (100%, E=9.7e-77, 221/227 cols, query 500-720), N-terminal PPE/ESX-1/WXG100 hits (90-96%, E>=0.87) -- sub-significant, PE/PPE promiscuity, not retained. Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 68.2, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2081c (- strand, 203 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2083 (+ strand, -4 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2082 · Rv2083 · Rv2084

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 3: Rv2082 · Rv2083 · Rv2084 — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2144) exponential phase: operon of 7, Rv2078 · Rv2079 · Rv2080 · Rv2082 · Rv2083 · Rv2084 · Rv2085 (coverage 42.22)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2086 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 840, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 179 partners at medium confidence (67 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 179 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2086 hypothetical protein 841 840 ctx neighborhood:552 cooccurence:655
Rv0977 PE_PGRS16 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS16 838 833 ctx cooccurence:773
Rv3448 eccD4 ESX-4 secretion system protein EccD4 831 832 ctx cooccurence:715 coexpression:432
Rv2083 dark hypothetical protein 827 827 ctx neighborhood:785
Rv2305 hypothetical protein 818 818 ctx cooccurence:718
Rv2084 dark hypothetical protein 807 807 ctx neighborhood:801
Rv2085 hypothetical protein 795 796 ctx neighborhood:552 cooccurence:559
Rv0124 PE_PGRS2 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS2 790 782 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv2490c PE_PGRS43 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS43 790 782 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv1452c PE_PGRS28 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS28 790 782 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv0872c PE_PGRS15 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS15 790 782 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv1651c PE_PGRS30 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS30 790 782 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv2853 PE_PGRS48 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS48 789 781 ctx cooccurence:773
Rv1243c PE_PGRS23 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS23 786 779 ctx cooccurence:770
Rv1917c PPE34 PPE family protein PPE34 777 777 ctx cooccurence:774

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF5631 domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DUF5632 PF18646.7 (E=1e-30), DUF5631 PF18645.7 (E=6e-40)
  • (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216598.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF5632 (PF18646.7), DUF5631 (PF18645.7)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2A1TI
  • Curated reference: UniProt Q10690 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 179 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2086
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Lineage-specific relaxation: per-lineage disruption fraction vs the pooled MTBC (145k strains), Fisher exact test with FDR correction; general phenomenon established at genome scale by Silva-Pereira et al. 2024 (doi:10.1128/spectrum.02289-23) -- one evidence handle on this atlas's own dark genes, never sufficient alone for a verdict change
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam SZ, et al. (2018). A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core Journal of Molecular Biology. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002218|Rv2082|
MAGDLPPGRWSALLVGAWWPAQPDAPMAGVTYWRKAAQLKRNEANDLRNERSRLAVNQGRTADDLLERYWRGEQRLATIAHQCEIKSDQSEQVADTVNYLRDRLTEIAQSGNQQINQILAGKGPIEAKVAAVNAVIEQSNAMADHVGATAMSNIIDATQRVFDETIGGDAHTWLRDHGVSLDTPARSRPVTAEDMTSMTAKSPAESPFGTAQSAPSHSTTNSGPLTAPTPTAPFGSGQSAPGLSLPRSNAPMLSLATSPFGTTHMMPGPPPPGTVSPPLPPSAPAVGVGGPSVPAAGMPPAAAAATAPLSPQSLGQSFTTGMTTGTPAAAGAQALSAGVVHAATEPLPPPAPPPTTPTVTTPTVATATTAGIPHIPDSAPTPSPAPIAPPTTDNASAMTPIAPMVANGPPASPAPPAAAPAGPLPAYGADLRPPVTTPPATPPTPTGPISGAAVTPSSPAAGGSLMSPVVNKSTAPATTQAQPSNPTPPLASATAAATTGAAAGDTSRRAAEQQRLRRILDTVARQEPGLSWAAGLRDNGQTTLLVTDLASGWIPPHIRLPAHITLLEPAPRRRHATVTDLLGTTTVAAAHHPHGYLSQPDPDTPALTGDRTARIAPTIDELGPTLVETVRRHDTLPRIAQAVVVAATRNYGVPDNETDLLHHKTTEIHQAVLTTYPNHDIATVVDWMLLAAINALIAGDQSGANYHLAWAIAAISTRRSR