uvrA Family assigned · medium auto-curated
H37Rv Rv1638 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001746 ·
972 aa ·
1855762–1858680 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_216154.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | excinuclease ABC subunit UvrA |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | excinuclease ABC subunit UvrA |
| Revised (this work) | Excinuclease ABC subunit UvrA. Pfam: UvrA_inter (PF17760.7), UvrA_DNA-bind (PF17755.7). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | information pathways |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 17 publications
17 TB publications mention this gene. 17 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 15 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 4 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 4-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (4)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| Mechanistic understanding of UvrA damage detection and lesion hand-off to UvrB in Nucleotide Excision Repair. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58670-0 | 2025 |
| Mechanical morphotype switching as an adaptive response in mycobacteria. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh7957 | 2024 |
| Interrogating the substrate specificity landscape of UvrC reveals novel insights into its non-canonical function. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2022.07.012 | 2022 |
| Identification of the target and mode of action for the prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair inhibitor ATBC. doi:10.1042/BSR20220403 | 2022 |
| Mycobacteria excise DNA damage in 12- or 13-nucleotide-long oligomers by prokaryotic-type dual incisions and performs transcription-coupled repair. doi:10.1074/jbc.AC120.016325 | 2020 |
17 records returned by the alias sweep
Searched as: Rv1638, uvrA, Mb1664, ML1392, MMAR_2443, MSMEG_3808, MAB_2315
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.74 (95% CI -1.80 to 4.77). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.268 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=24 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Involved in nucleotide excision repair. The ABC excision nuclease is a DNA repair enzyme that catalyzes the excision reaction of UV-damaged nucleotide segments producing oligomers having the modified base(S). UVRA is an ATPase and a DNA-binding protein that preferentially binds single-stranded or UV-irradiated double-stranded DNA. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb1664
· 99.9% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML1392
· 90.5% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_2443
· 93.1% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_3808
· 89.4% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_001712
· 99.9% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_2315
· 86.5% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WQK7
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | UvrABC system protein A |
| Curated function | The UvrABC repair system catalyzes the recognition and processing of DNA lesions. UvrA is an ATPase and a DNA-binding protein. A damage recognition complex composed of 2 UvrA and 2 UvrB subunits scans DNA for abnormalities. When the presence of a lesion has been verified by UvrB, the UvrA molecules dissociate. Alone it slightly inhibits RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange, in concert with UvrD1 greatly inhibits RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
L Replication, recombination and repair
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | uvrA |
| eggNOG description | The UvrABC repair system catalyzes the recognition and processing of DNA lesions. UvrA is an ATPase and a DNA-binding protein. A damage recognition complex composed of 2 UvrA and 2 UvrB subunits scans DNA for abnormalities. When the presence of a lesion has been verified by UvrB, the UvrA molecules dissociate |
| Orthologous group | COG0178 |
| KEGG orthology |
K03701
|
| KEGG pathways |
map03420
|
| Gene Ontology (42) |
GO:0000018, GO:0005575, GO:0005618, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0005737, GO:0005829, GO:0005886, GO:0006950, GO:0006974, GO:0008150, GO:0009892 +30 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.397 · purifying |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 8 synonymous, 9 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.177 (low power)
· 3 consensus substitution(s) low power (3 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 93.3%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 13/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 74.0% detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
39 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
39 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.974,
mean read count 78.2105263158.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 39 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) | -4.26 | 0.0 | required |
| differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) | +2.95 | 0.0 | disruption advantageous |
| fitness after prolonged in vitro passage (in vitro passage) | -2.65 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -2.51 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection, day 10 (in vivo) | -2.06 | 0.029 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -2.02 | 0.0 | required |
| altered fitness under 6 weeks hypoxia (stress) | -1.18 | 0.0 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 7 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 12 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 69.7 ppm · rank 1536/3519 (56.4th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 972 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 106.1 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 6.44 |
| GRAVY | -0.249 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 91.4 |
| Aromaticity | 0.062 |
| Instability index | 34.0 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UvrA_inter | PF17760.7 | 5.5e-40 | 131–238 | UvrA interaction domain |
UvrA_DNA-bind | PF17755.7 | 4.9e-35 | 295–404 | UvrA DNA-binding domain |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
Experimental structure 3zqj (PDBe), the strongest available structural
evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default)
shown as sticks.
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 4 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
3zqj |
X-ray diffraction | 3.4 Å | 100% |
9ga4 |
Electron Microscopy | 3.7 Å | 100% |
9ga3 |
Electron Microscopy | 4.3 Å | 100% |
9ga5 |
Electron Microscopy | 3.2 Å | 98% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (4 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 87.5
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3zqj-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 98% | 98% / 100% | 0.0e+00 sig | 3zqj-assembly1_A Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrA |
3zqj-assembly4_D |
1.00 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 97% | 98% / 100% | 0.0e+00 sig | 3zqj-assembly4_D Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrA |
3zqj-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 96% | 98% / 100% | 0.0e+00 sig | 3zqj-assembly2_B Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrA |
3zqj-assembly5_E |
1.00 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 96% | 98% / 100% | 0.0e+00 sig | 3zqj-assembly5_E Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrA |
3zqj-assembly3_C |
1.00 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 92% | 98% / 100% | 0.0e+00 sig | 3zqj-assembly3_C Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrA |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 87.5, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv1637c (- strand, 48 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv1638A (- strand, 56 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1675) |
expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 50.88)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 17.29) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: uvrB (excinuclease ABC subunit UvrB), high confidence (score 998, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair is recorded in a curated database (pathway or complex membership) for M. tuberculosis genes themselves (score ≥ 200): a curated association, not a measurement in this organism. Its experimental-channel score is inherited from other proteomes.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 73 partners at medium confidence (20 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 73 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv1633 uvrB exp (transferred) |
excinuclease ABC subunit UvrB | 999 | 998 ctx | cooccurence:773 coexpression:836 experimental:928 textmining:979 |
Rv1020 mfd exp (transferred) |
transcription-repair coupling factor | 975 | 918 | experimental:912 textmining:716 |
Rv1420 uvrC |
excinuclease ABC subunit UvrC | 995 | 876 ctx | cooccurence:697 textmining:962 |
Rv1637c |
hypothetical protein | 796 | 789 ctx | neighborhood:788 |
Rv2191 |
hypothetical protein | 746 | 662 | |
Rv0949 uvrD1 |
ATP-dependent DNA helicase UvrD | 969 | 639 ctx | cooccurence:413 textmining:920 |
Rv2737c recA |
recombinase A | 915 | 584 | coexpression:442 textmining:806 |
Rv3198c uvrD2 |
ATP-dependent DNA helicase UvrD | 876 | 580 | textmining:717 |
Rv2373c dnaJ2 |
chaperone protein DnaJ | 622 | 572 | |
Rv3859c gltB |
glutamate synthase large subunit | 770 | 547 ctx | neighborhood:544 textmining:515 |
Rv2592c ruvB |
Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvB | 887 | 502 ctx | cooccurence:457 textmining:783 |
Rv1297 rho |
transcription termination factor Rho | 533 | 457 | coexpression:426 |
Rv3211 rhlE |
ATP-dependent RNA helicase RhlE | 480 | 447 | coexpression:429 |
Rv3014c ligA |
DNA ligase A | 673 | 446 | textmining:434 |
Rv0352 dnaJ1 |
chaperone protein DnaJ | 510 | 444 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: excinuclease ABC subunit UvrA
- MTBC0 PGAP product: excinuclease ABC subunit UvrA
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): UvrA_inter PF17760.7 (E=6e-40), UvrA_DNA-bind PF17755.7 (E=5e-35)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216154.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — UvrA_inter (PF17760.7), UvrA_DNA-bind (PF17755.7)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG0178 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WQK7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 87.5)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
73 functional partner(s); context anchor
uvrB - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_001746|Rv1638|uvrA MADRLIVKGAREHNLRSVDLDLPRDALIVFTGLSGSGKSSLAFDTIFAEGQRRYVESLSAYARQFLGQMDKPDVDFIEGLSPAVSIDQKSTNRNPRSTVGTITEVYDYLRLLYARAGTPHCPTCGERVARQTPQQIVDQVLAMPEGTRFLVLAPVVRTRKGEFADLFDKLNAQGYSRVRVDGVVHPLTDPPKLKKQEKHDIEVVVDRLTVKAAAKRRLTDSVETALNLADGIVVLEFVDHELGAPHREQRFSEKLACPNGHALAVDDLEPRSFSFNSPYGACPECSGLGIRKEVDPELVVPDPDRTLAQGAVAPWSNGHTAEYFTRMMAGLGEALGFDVDTPWRKLPAKARKAILEGADEQVHVRYRNRYGRTRSYYADFEGVLAFLQRKMSQTESEQMKERYEGFMRDVPCPVCAGTRLKPEILAVTLAGESKGEHGAKSIAEVCELSIADCADFLNALTLGPREQAIAGQVLKEIRSRLGFLLDVGLEYLSLSRAAATLSGGEAQRIRLATQIGSGLVGVLYVLDEPSIGLHQRDNRRLIETLTRLRDLGNTLIVVEHDEDTIEHADWIVDIGPGAGEHGGRIVHSGPYDELLRNKDSITGAYLSGRESIEIPAIRRSVDPRRQLTVVGAREHNLRGIDVSFPLGVLTSVTGVSGSGKSTLVNDILAAVLANRLNGARQVPGRHTRVTGLDYLDKLVRVDQSPIGRTPRSNPATYTGVFDKIRTLFAATTEAKVRGYQPGRFSFNVKGGRCEACTGDGTIKIEMNFLPDVYVPCEVCQGARYNRETLEVHYKGKTVSEVLDMSIEEAAEFFEPIAGVHRYLRTLVDVGLGYVRLGQPAPTLSGGEAQRVKLASELQKRSTGRTVYILDEPTTGLHFDDIRKLLNVINGLVDKGNTVIVIEHNLDVIKTSDWIIDLGPEGGAGGGTVVAQGTPEDVAAVPASYTGKFLAEVVGGGASAATSRSNRRRNVSA
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for uvrA? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about uvrA