irtA Family assigned · medium auto-curated
H37Rv Rv1348 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001446 ·
859 aa ·
1523749–1526328 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_215864.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | iron ABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease IrtA |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | iron ABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease IrtA |
| Revised (this work) | Iron ABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease IrtA. Pfam: FAD_binding_9 (PF08021.18), SIP (PF04954.19), ABC_membrane (PF00664.29), ABC_tran (PF00005.34). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 9 publications
9 TB publications mention this gene. 9 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 9 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 2 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 2-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (2)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.
75 records returned by the alias sweep
Searched as: Rv1348, irtA, Mb1383, MMAR_4037, MSMEG_6554, MAB_2262c
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
This count disagrees with the 9 reported above. The two come from different methods and both are shown rather than one being silently overwritten. The figure above comes from the older curated source, which missed this gene; the sweep below queries every alias of the gene in a mycobacterial context. Where they differ this way, the list below is the one you can check line by line.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | irtB (Rv1349, + strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
IdeR (ideR).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -4.74 (95% CI -5.08 to -4.42). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Involved in iron homeostasis. Responsible for energy coupling to the transport system and for the translocation of the substrate across the membrane. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb1383
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_4037
· 77.1% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_6554
· 71.7% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_001423
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_2262c
· 62.6% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WQJ9
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Mycobactin import ATP-binding/permease protein IrtA |
| EC (curated) |
EC 7.2.2.-
|
| Curated function | Part of the ABC transporter complex IrtAB involved in the import of iron-bound mycobactin (Fe-MBT) and carboxymycobactin (Fe-cMBT) (By similarity). Mycobactins are then reduced by the siderophore interaction domain to facilitate iron release in the bacterial cell (By similarity). Transmembrane domains (TMD) form a pore in the membrane and the ATP-binding domain (NBD) is responsible for energy generation (By similarity). Required for replication in human macrophages and in mouse lungs. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
P Inorganic ion transport and metabolismV Defense mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | irtA |
| eggNOG description | ABC transporter |
| Orthologous group | COG1132 |
| KEGG orthology |
K06147, K14698
|
| KEGG pathways |
map02010
|
| Gene Ontology (88) |
GO:0000041, GO:0000166, GO:0003674, GO:0005215, GO:0005488, GO:0005575, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0006810, GO:0006811, GO:0006812, GO:0006826 +76 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.37 · purifying |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 6 synonymous, 6 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.093 (low power)
· 5 consensus substitution(s) low power (5 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 37/53 (70%) · mean identity 75.9%
· 2/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 37/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 4/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 48.0% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) ESD — not strictly essential
These two screens are not in plain contradiction here, but they do not say the same thing either, and the difference matters for what may be written about this gene. Tn-seq (DeJesus 2017) places the requirement on a SUB-REGION of the ORF and explicitly declines to call the whole gene essential; CRISPRi (Bosch 2021) calls the gene essential under partial knockdown. Both point to an important gene; they disagree on the SCOPE of what is required. Locate the domain before concluding, and note that a stretch carrying no TA site is invisible to Himar1 Tn-seq — neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred there. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -4.742), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 26 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 27 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | ESD · essential domain |
|---|---|
| What the call means | essential domain: only a SUB-REGION of the ORF is essential; the gene as a whole is NOT essential. Locate the domain before concluding, and beware that a region devoid of TA sites is invisible to Himar1 TnSeq (neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred). |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
38 in the ORF —
11 in the essential state,
8 growth-defect,
19 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.553,
mean read count 24.619047619.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 38 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain
This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.
| Hypomorph strain | Rv1348-Rv1348_TetON18.3 (TetON promoter 18) |
|---|---|
| Baseline knockdown fitness | 3.573 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown |
| Used in target deconvolution | yes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment) |
Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) | -3.74 | 0.007 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -2.78 | 0.015 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -2.33 | 0.034 | required |
| fitness after prolonged in vitro passage (in vitro passage) | -2.06 | 0.013 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 4 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 3.69 ppm · rank 3037/3519 (13.7th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (6 TM helixes) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 6 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 859 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 93.0 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 6.92 |
| GRAVY | 0.13 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 103.9 |
| Aromaticity | 0.071 |
| Instability index | 36.2 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD_binding_9 | PF08021.18 | 2.1e-10 | 60–113 | Siderophore-interacting FAD-binding domain |
SIP | PF04954.19 | 2.4e-26 | 130–241 | Siderophore-interacting protein |
ABC_membrane | PF00664.29 | 7.9e-16 | 294–553 | ABC transporter transmembrane region |
ABC_tran | PF00005.34 | 9.4e-29 | 627–774 | ABC transporter |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
Experimental structure 7wiv (PDBe), the strongest available structural
evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default)
shown as sticks.
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 4 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
7wiv |
Electron Microscopy | 2.88 Å | 100% |
7wiw |
Electron Microscopy | 3.12 Å | 100% |
7wiu |
Electron Microscopy | 3.48 Å | 100% |
7wix |
Electron Microscopy | 3.53 Å | 100% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (4 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 84.5
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7wix-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.93 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 100% | 66% / 100% | 4.0e-72 sig | 7wix-assembly1_A Cryo-EM structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis irtAB in complex with ADP |
7wiw-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.86 | 0.59 | 0.86 | 100% | 66% / 100% | 1.6e-70 sig | 7wiw-assembly1_A Cryo-EM structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis irtAB complexed with ATP in an occluded conformation |
9g36-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.92 | 0.61 | 0.92 | 75% | 66% / 100% | 9.1e-66 sig | 9g36-assembly1_A Cryo-EM structure of IrtAB 3xHtoA mutant in inward-facing state in presence of mycobactin under turnover conditions in LMNG |
9g2z-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.88 | 0.59 | 0.88 | 75% | 66% / 100% | 3.7e-64 sig | 9g2z-assembly1_A Cryo-EM structure of IrtAB in outward-occluded state under turnover conditions in LMNG |
6tej-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.92 | 0.61 | 0.92 | 75% | 66% / 100% | 9.3e-63 sig | 6tej-assembly1_A Structure of apo IrtAB devoid SID in complex with sybody Syb_NL5 |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 84.5, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2
| Upstream (5' on genome) | leuW (+ strand, 235 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | irtB (+ strand, -4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
irtA · irtB
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
irtA · irtB
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1390) |
not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase) |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (2 TF) |
Rv0135c (represses) · Rv3830c (activates)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: irtB (iron ABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease IrtB), high confidence (score 998, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair is recorded in a curated database (pathway or complex membership) for M. tuberculosis genes themselves (score ≥ 200): a curated association, not a measurement in this organism. This partner is also a paralogue of this gene (STRING homology score 664), so the association may reflect shared ancestry rather than a shared pathway.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 151 partners at medium confidence (20 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 151 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv1349 irtB curated paralog |
iron ABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease IrtB | 999 | 998 ctx | neighborhood:833 coexpression:861 database:900 textmining:623 |
Rv2383c mbtB |
phenyloxazoline synthase | 979 | 919 ctx | neighborhood:544 coexpression:757 textmining:756 |
Rv2384 mbtA |
2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase | 956 | 896 | coexpression:853 textmining:596 |
Rv2386c mbtI |
salicylate synthase | 909 | 796 | coexpression:751 textmining:577 |
Rv3402c |
hypothetical protein | 831 | 787 | coexpression:780 |
Rv0435c curated |
ATPase | 773 | 745 | database:528 |
Rv0282 eccA3 curated |
ESX-3 secretion system protein EccA | 855 | 716 | database:528 textmining:511 |
Rv0350 dnaK |
chaperone protein DnaK | 730 | 702 ctx | cooccurence:471 |
Rv1350 fabG2 |
3-oxoacyl-ACP reductase FabG | 692 | 678 ctx | neighborhood:506 |
Rv3884c eccA2 curated |
ESX-2 secretion system protein EccA | 705 | 663 | database:528 |
Rv3868 eccA1 curated |
ESX-1 secretion system protein EccA1 | 749 | 662 | database:528 |
Rv2688c curated paralog |
antibiotic ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | 667 | 647 | database:536 |
Rv3846 sodA exp (transferred) |
superoxide dismutase | 663 | 643 | experimental:412 |
Rv2378c mbtG |
L-lysine N6-monooxygenase | 767 | 638 ctx | cooccurence:546 |
Rv1687c curated paralog |
ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | 654 | 632 | database:536 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: iron ABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease IrtA
- MTBC0 PGAP product: iron ABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease IrtA
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): FAD_binding_9 PF08021.18 (E=2e-10), SIP PF04954.19 (E=2e-26), ABC_membrane PF00664.29 (E=8e-16), ABC_tran PF00005.34 (E=9e-29)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215864.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — FAD_binding_9 (PF08021.18), SIP (PF04954.19), ABC_membrane (PF00664.29), ABC_tran (PF00005.34)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG1132 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WQJ9 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 84.5)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
151 functional partner(s); context anchor
irtB - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_001446|Rv1348|irtA MARGLQGVMLRSFGARDHTATVIETISIAPHFVRVRMVSPTLFQDAEAEPAAWLRFWFPDPNGSNTEFQRAYTISEADPAAGRFAVDVVLHDPAGPASSWARTVKPGATIAVMSLMGSSRFDVPEEQPAGYLLIGDSASIPGMNGIIETVPNDVPIEMYLEQHDDNDTLIPLAKHPRLRVRWVMRRDEKSLAEAIENRDWSDWYAWATPEAAALKCVRVRLRDEFGFPKSEIHAQAYWNAGRAMGTHRATEPAATEPEVGAAPQPESAVPAPARGSWRAQAASRLLAPLKLPLVLSGVLAALVTLAQLAPFVLLVELSRLLVSGAGAHRLFTVGFAAVGLLGTGALLAAALTLWLHVIDARFARALRLRLLSKLSRLPLGWFTSRGSGSIKKLVTDDTLALHYLVTHAVPDAVAAVVAPVGVLVYLFVVDWRVALVLFGPVLVYLTITSSLTIQSGPRIVQAQRWAEKMNGEAGSYLEGQPVIRVFGAASSSFRRRLDEYIGFLVAWQRPLAGKKTLMDLATRPATFLWLIAATGTLLVATHRMDPVNLLPFMFLGTTFGARLLGIAYGLGGLRTGLLAARHLQVTLDETELAVREHPREPLDGEAPATVVFDHVTFGYRPGVPVIQDVSLTLRPGTVTALVGPSGSGKSTLATLLARFHDVERGAIRVGGQDIRSLAADELYTRVGFVLQEAQLVHGTAAENIALAVPDAPAEQVQVAAREAQIHDRVLRLPDGYDTVLGANSGLSGGERQRLTIARAILGDTPVLILDEATAFADPESEYLVQQALNRLTRDRTVLVIAHRLHTITRADQIVVLDHGRIVERGTHEELLAAGGRYCRLWDTGQGSRVAVAAAQDGTR
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for irtA? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about irtA