mmpL2 Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv0507 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000535 · 968 aa · 600656–603562 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_215021.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transmembrane transport protein MmpL2
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationRND transporter MmpL2
Revised (this work)RND transporter MmpL2. Pfam: MMPL (PF03176.22).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 6 publications

6 TB publications mention this gene. 6 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 5 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 6: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Efflux pump gene single-nucleotide variants associated with resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with discrepant drug genotypes. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2024.05.006 2024
[Investigation of Efflux Pump Genes in Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Clinical Isolates Exposed to First Line Antituberculosis Drugs and Verapamil Combination]. doi:10.5578/mb.20239916 2023
Potential impact of efflux pump genes in mediating rifampicin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from India. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223163 2019
Contribution of putative efflux pump genes to isoniazid resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_26_17 2017
Crystal structure of the transcriptional regulator Rv0678 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.538959 2014
6 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv0507, mmpL2, Mb0519, MMAR_0840 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Efflux pump gene single-nucleotide variants associated with resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with discrepant drug genotypes. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2024.05.006 J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2024
[Investigation of Efflux Pump Genes in Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Clinical Isolates Exposed to First Line Antituberculosis Drugs and Verapamil Combination]. doi:10.5578/mb.20239916 Mikrobiyol Bul 2023
Potential impact of efflux pump genes in mediating rifampicin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from India. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223163 PLoS One 2019
Contribution of putative efflux pump genes to isoniazid resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_26_17 Int J Mycobacteriol 2017
Crystal structure of the transcriptional regulator Rv0678 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.538959 J Biol Chem 2014
A Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis LuxR regulates cell envelope and virulence. doi:10.1177/1753425909339811 Innate Immun 2010

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourRv0508 (Rv0508, + strand)
Overlap8 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.48 (95% CI -1.43 to 3.41). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.325 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=43 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionUnknown. Thought to be involved in fatty acid transport.

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0519 · 99.6% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0840 · 86.7% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000534 · 99.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WJV7 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameProbable transport protein MmpL2

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
Preferred namemmpL2
eggNOG descriptiontransport protein
Orthologous groupCOG1033
KEGG orthology K06994
Gene Ontology (17) GO:0005575, GO:0005618, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0008150, GO:0016020, GO:0030312, GO:0040007, GO:0044110, GO:0044116, GO:0044117, GO:0044119 +5 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.741 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 7 synonymous, 16 missense, 0 nonsense, 3 frameshift
Disruption 3 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.77% of strains (1092) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) site unique fixé — Bovis, L4; union over all sites: 2 420 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:599199:GT:G · frameshift · 1 092 strains — fixed in 2 sub-clades of Bovis, L4, totalling 1 229 strains — 1.8% of the 67 725 strains in the lineages named (largest: L4.6.2 950/1222, Bovis.2.2.1.2.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.2 7/7)
  • NC_000962.3:598535:TAATCC:T · frameshift · 947 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:599285:GT:G · frameshift · 381 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.195 · 8 consensus substitution(s)
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.195) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 69.9% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 2/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 44.3%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 82 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 82 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.902, mean read count 111.067567568. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
81 of these 82 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 1 of this ORF's 82 TA sites lies inside Rv0508 (1 site), leaving 81 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 81 exclusive sites.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain

This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.

Hypomorph strainmmpl2-tetOn-6.2 (TetON promoter 6)
Baseline knockdown fitness5.185 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown
Used in target deconvolutionyes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment)

Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 8 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance5.97 ppm · rank 2877/3519 (18.3th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (12 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)12

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length968 aa
Molecular weight106.2 kDa
Theoretical pI6.57
GRAVY0.322 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index104.9
Aromaticity0.085
Instability index41.2 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
MMPLPF03176.22 8.8e-12054–382 MMPL family

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 85.0, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 85.0

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
9b43-assembly1_A 1.00 0.98 0.75 0.98 50% 96% / 100% 1.2e-69 sig 9b43-assembly1_A Mycolicibacterium smegmatis MmpL4 structure
9b46-assembly1_A 1.00 0.98 0.74 0.98 47% 95% / 100% 7.5e-67 sig 9b46-assembly1_A Mycolicibacterium smegmatis MmpL5 structure
7k8b-assembly1_A 1.00 0.78 0.60 0.78 15% 97% / 98% 1.7e-23 sig 7k8b-assembly1_A CryoEM structure of a trehalose monomycolate transporter in lipid nanodiscs
6n40-assembly1_A 1.00 0.79 0.61 0.79 14% 95% / 98% 1.6e-21 sig 6n40-assembly1_A Crystal structure of MmpL3 from Mycobacterium smegmatis
7k8a-assembly1_A 1.00 0.77 0.59 0.77 14% 98% / 99% 3.1e-21 sig 7k8a-assembly1_A CryoEM structure of a trehalose monomycolate transporter in lipid nanodiscs

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 85.0, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 6

Upstream (5' on genome)mmpS2 (+ strand, -4 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv0508 (+ strand, -8 bp gap)
Predicted operon mmpS2 · mmpL2 · Rv0508 · hemA · hemC · hemD

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0528) exponential phase: operon of 10, Rv0506 · Rv0507 · Rv0508 · Rv0509 · Rv0510 · Rv0511 · Rv0512 · Rv0513 · Rv0514 · Rv0515 (coverage 68.99)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (4 TF) Rv0081 (represses) · mmpR5 (represses) · Rv1985c (represses) · Rv1990c (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: mmpS2 (membrane protein MmpS2), high confidence (score 883, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 43 partners at medium confidence (4 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 43 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0506 mmpS2 membrane protein MmpS2 900 883 ctx neighborhood:881
Rv0508 hypothetical protein 867 867 ctx neighborhood:866
Rv1598c hypothetical protein 700 701 ctx cooccurence:699
Rv1303 hypothetical protein 667 667 ctx cooccurence:666
Rv0509 hemA glutamyl-tRNA reductase 637 637 ctx neighborhood:637
Rv0290 eccD3 ESX-3 secretion system protein EccD 630 630 ctx cooccurence:630
Rv0510 hemC porphobilinogen deaminase 620 620 ctx neighborhood:618
Rv2945c lppX lipoprotein LppX 652 616 ctx cooccurence:615
Rv1145 mmpL13a transmembrane transport protein 596 581 ctx cooccurence:578
Rv0128 transmembrane protein 580 580 ctx cooccurence:580
Rv0511 hemD uroporphyrin-III C-methyltransferase 537 536 ctx neighborhood:534
Rv0256c PPE2 PPE family protein PPE2 526 526 ctx cooccurence:526
Rv0505c serB1 phosphoserine phosphatase SerB 515 516 ctx neighborhood:511
Rv0283 eccB3 ESX-3 secretion system protein EccB3 502 503 ctx cooccurence:485
Rv1278 hypothetical protein 479 480 ctx cooccurence:478

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: transmembrane transport protein MmpL2
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: RND transporter MmpL2
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): MMPL PF03176.22 (E=9e-120)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215021.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — MMPL (PF03176.22)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1033
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WJV7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 85.0)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 43 functional partner(s); context anchor mmpS2
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000535|Rv0507|mmpL2
MSERHAALTSLPPILPRLIRRFAVVIVLLWLGFTAFVNLAVPQLEVVGKAHSVSMSPSDAASIQAIKRVGQVFGEFDSDNAVTIVLEGDQPLGGDAHRFYSDLMRKLSADTRHVAHIQDFWGDPLTAAGSQSADDRAAYVVVYLVGNNETEAYDSVHAVRHMVDTTPPPHGVKAYVTGPAALNADQAEAGDKSIAKVTAITSMVIAAMLLVIYRSVITAVLVLIMVGIDLGAIRGFIALLADHNIFSLSTFATNLLVLMAIAASTDYAIFMLGRYHESRYAGEDRETAFYTMFHGTAHVILGSGLTIAGAMYCLSFARLPYFETLGAPIAIGMLVAVLAALTLGPAVLTVGSFFKLFDPKRRMNTRRWRRVGTAIVRWPGPVLAATCLVASIGLLALPSYRTTYDLRKFMPASMPSNVGDAAAGRHFSRARLNPEVLLIETDHDMRNPVDMLVLDKVAKNIYHSPGIEQVKAITRPLGTTIKHTSIPFIISMQGVNSSEQMEFMKDRIDDILVQVAAMNTSIETMHRMYALMGEVIDNTVDMDHLTHDMSDITATLRDHLADFEDFFRPIRSYFYWEKHCFDVPLCWSIRSIFDMFDSVDQLSEKLEYLVKDMDILITLLPQMRAQMPPMISAMTTMRDMMLIWHGTLGAFYKQQERNNKDPGAMGRVFDAAQIDDSFYLPQSAFENPDFKRGLKMFLSPDGKAARFVIALEGDPATPEGISRVEPIKREAREAIKGTPLQGAAIYLGGTAATFKDIREGARYDLLIAGVAAISLILIIMMIITRSVVAAVVIVGTVVLSMGASFGLSVLVWQDILGIELYWMVLAMSVILLLAVGSDYNLLLISRLKEEIGAGLNTGIIRAMAGTGGVVTAAGMVFAVTMSLFVFSDLRIIGQIGTTIGLGLLFDTLVVRSFMTPSIAALLGRWFWWPLRVRPRPASQMLRPFAPRRLVRALLLPSGQHPSATGAHE