crgA Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv0011c · MTBC0 mtbc0_000015 · 93 aa · 13714–13995 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_214525.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)cell division protein CrgA
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationcell division protein CrgA
Revised (this work)Cell division protein CrgA. Pfam: CrgA (PF06781.18).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 12 publications

12 TB publications mention this gene. 12 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 11 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 3 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 3-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (3)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 12: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Mycobacterium tuberculosis CrgA Forms a Dimeric Structure with Its Transmembrane Domain Sandwiched between Cytoplasmic and Periplasmic β-Sheets, Enabling Multiple Interactions with Other Divisome Proteins. doi:10.1021/jacs.4c17168 2025
Mycobacterium tuberculosis CrgA Forms a Dimeric Structure with Its Transmembrane Domain Sandwiched between Cytoplasmic and Periplasmic β-Sheets, Enabling Multiple Interactions with Other Divisome Proteins. doi:10.1101/2024.12.05.627054 2025
Expanding the Toolset of Biomolecular NMR with Efficient and Cost-Effective 17O-Labeling via Bacterial Expression. doi:10.1002/chem.202403148 2025
Membrane Tethering of SepF, a Membrane Anchor for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Z-ring. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167817 2022
The MmpL3 interactome reveals a complex crosstalk between cell envelope biosynthesis and cell elongation and division in mycobacteria. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47159-8 2019
12 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv0011c, crgA, Mb0011c, ML0013c, MMAR_0013, MSMEG_0026, MAB_0029c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Mycobacterium tuberculosis CrgA Forms a Dimeric Structure with Its Transmembrane Domain Sandwiched between Cytoplasmic and Periplasmic β-Sheets, Enabling Multiple Interactions with Other Divisome Proteins. doi:10.1021/jacs.4c17168 names it J Am Chem Soc 2025
Mycobacterium tuberculosis CrgA Forms a Dimeric Structure with Its Transmembrane Domain Sandwiched between Cytoplasmic and Periplasmic β-Sheets, Enabling Multiple Interactions with Other Divisome Proteins. doi:10.1101/2024.12.05.627054 names it bioRxiv 2025
Expanding the Toolset of Biomolecular NMR with Efficient and Cost-Effective (17)O-Labeling via Bacterial Expression. doi:10.1002/chem.202403148 Chemistry 2025
Membrane Tethering of SepF, a Membrane Anchor for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Z-ring. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167817 J Mol Biol 2022
The MmpL3 interactome reveals a complex crosstalk between cell envelope biosynthesis and cell elongation and division in mycobacteria. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47159-8 Sci Rep 2019
Correction for Das et al., Structure of CrgA, a cell division structural and regulatory protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, in lipid bilayers. doi:10.1073/pnas.1500959112 names it Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015
Structure of CrgA, a cell division structural and regulatory protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, in lipid bilayers. doi:10.1073/pnas.1415908112 names it Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015
Mycobacterium tuberculosis CwsA overproduction modulates cell division and cell wall synthesis. doi:10.1016/S1472-9792(13)70006-4 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2013
Lipid bilayer preparations of membrane proteins for oriented and magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR samples. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.129 Nat Protoc 2013
Mycobacterium tuberculosis CwsA interacts with CrgA and Wag31, and the CrgA-CwsA complex is involved in peptidoglycan synthesis and cell shape determination. doi:10.1128/JB.01005-12 names it J Bacteriol 2012
Characterization of CrgA, a new partner of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptidoglycan polymerization complexes. doi:10.1128/JB.00188-11 names it J Bacteriol 2011
Crystal structure of ArgP from Mycobacterium tuberculosis confirms two distinct conformations of full-length LysR transcriptional regulators and reveals its function in DNA binding and transcriptional regulation. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.12.033 J Mol Biol 2010

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder22% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 67.1
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 20 aa [0-20]

carries a substantial disordered region (20/93 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -2.65 (95% CI -4.69 to 0.10). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.072 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=4 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0011c · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML0013c · 89.2% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0013 · 92.5% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_0026 · 80.6% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000015 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_0029c · 72.8% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WP57 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameCell division protein CrgA
Curated functionInvolved in cell division. Plays an important role in septal peptidoglycan synthesis and cell shape morphogenesis. May facilitate the recruitment of the peptidoglycan synthesis machinery to poles and septal zones and coordinate peptidoglycan synthesis at these sites.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category D Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Preferred namecrgA
eggNOG descriptionCell division protein CrgA
Orthologous group2B592

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.0 · quasi-invariant (1 site), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 1 synonymous, 0 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 90.8% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 7/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 53.6%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 3 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 3 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 10.3333333333. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 3 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatStatistically thin call: only 3 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 7 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance315.0 ppm · rank 622/3519 (82.4th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (2 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)2

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length93 aa
Molecular weight10.4 kDa
Theoretical pI11.2
GRAVY0.632 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index105.9
Aromaticity0.129
Instability index34.0 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
CrgAPF06781.18 1.1e-271–93 Cell division protein CrgA

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 2mmu (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 2 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
2mmu Solid-state NMR — 100%
9nm2 Solid-state NMR — 100%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (2 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv0010c (- strand, 155 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv0012 (+ strand, 93 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0014) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv0010c · Rv0011c (coverage 52.3)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 35.6) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (2 TF) whiA (activates) · devR (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0010c (membrane protein), high confidence (score 797, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 50 partners at medium confidence (12 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. Of the 50 partners, 5 rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0010c membrane protein 903 797 ctx neighborhood:749 textmining:545
Rv0012 membrane protein 784 785 ctx neighborhood:782
Rv0013 trpG anthranilate synthase component II 749 749 ctx neighborhood:747
Rv3311 hypothetical protein 663 663 ctx cooccurence:661
Rv2170 GCN5-like N-acetyltransferase 638 638 ctx cooccurence:638
Rv3259 hypothetical protein 613 613 ctx cooccurence:611
Rv2520c dark membrane protein 596 597 ctx cooccurence:594
Rv3212 hypothetical protein 542 543 ctx cooccurence:538
Rv0016c pbpA measured in Mtb penicillin-binding protein PbpA 901 522 textmining:802
Rv2150c ftsZ measured in Mtb cell division protein FtsZ 875 514 experimental:500 textmining:754
Rv2163c pbpB measured in Mtb penicillin-binding membrane protein PbpB 900 506 textmining:806
Rv0008c cwsA measured in Mtb cell wall synthesis protein CwsA 937 501 experimental:500 textmining:879
Rv3782 glfT1 galactofuranosyl transferase GlfT 485 486 ctx cooccurence:471
Rv1417 membrane protein 485 485 ctx cooccurence:480
Rv1222 rseA anti-sigma E factor RseA 448 449 ctx cooccurence:447

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: cell division protein CrgA
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: cell division protein CrgA
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): CrgA PF06781.18 (E=1e-27)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214525.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — CrgA (PF06781.18)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2B592
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WP57 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 50 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv0010c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000015|Rv0011c|crgA
MPKSKVRKKNDFTVSAVSRTPMKVKVGPSSVWFVSLFIGLMLIGLIWLMVFQLAAIGSQAPTALNWMAQLGPWNYAIAFAFMITGLLLTMRWH