Rv0004 Resolved · high

H37Rv Rv0004 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000004 · 187 aa · 4434–4997 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_214518.1

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • Three sources, two directions: targeted genetics (Mann et al. 2017, PLoS Genet) shows that depleting DciA blocks the cell cycle, and CRISPRi (Bosch 2021) calls the gene essential - but with an estimate its own authors declare uncertain (5 guides, VI confidence interval from -8.8 to +0.4) - while the genome-wide Tn-seq screen (DeJesus 2017) calls it non-essential. The sentence on this page follows the targeted experiment; the Tn-seq call is kept as published, not rewritten. (essentiality screens disagree, text vs essentiality, 2026-09-09)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDNA replication protein DciA
Revised (this work)DciA, DNA replication protein. Directly binds DNA and the replicative helicase DnaB and regulates the DnaB-DnaA interaction; functional analogue of the DnaC/DnaI helicase loaders that mycobacteria lack. Essential for viability; its depletion blocks cell-cycle progression.
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

Found under: H37Rv (1).

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

Full-text-only mention found (Europe PMC), not visible to the title/abstract sweep above.

Enrichment pass (not a full re-read): the wave-1/2 triage already recorded this claim as identity_claim=yes with reasoning that shares specific technical vocabulary with this atlas's own function assignment (DciA, DNA replication protein. Directly binds DNA and the re). Treated as corroborating, not as new evidence changing the verdict.

CORROBORATES existing atlas assignment (lexical cross-check, wave1/2 enrichment pass, not independently re-read in full).

Lighter-weight than the dark-gene deep-dive protocol (phase141-151): no tbmonitor/fullTextXML re-read performed here, only a lexical consistency check against the pre-existing triage reasoning. Sufficient for an already-functional gene (enrichment), not for resolving a hypothetical.

Europe PMC full-text sweep (P16.2a-septies, phase138, vagues 1/2), passe d'enrichissement en masse (phase152, 2026-08-18) : corroboration etablie par chevauchement LEXICAL entre le raisonnement du triage initial et la fonction deja assignee dans l'atlas -- PAS une relecture integrale du papier (protocole delibere plus leger que le deep-dive dark, proportionne a une tache d'enrichissement de gene deja fonctionnel, pas de resolution d'un hypothetical).

PublicationDate
Rv0004 is a new essential member of the mycobacterial DNA replication machinery. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007115 2017
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv0004, Mb0004, ML0004, MMAR_0004, MSMEG_0004, MAB_0005 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Rv0004 is a new essential member of the mycobacterial DNA replication machinery. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007115 names it PLoS Genet 2017

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered

Predicted disorder55% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 77.2
Disordered regions2 IDR(s), longest 78 aa [0-78, 162-187]

sequence-based disorder is high but AlphaFold folds it confidently (pLDDT>=70): treat the disorder call with caution (possible metapredict over-call)

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene

NeighbourrecF (Rv0003, + strand)
Overlap4 bp, 1 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -4.38 (95% CI -8.78 to 0.41). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.523 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=5 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (requalified function). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0004 · 99.5% identity
M. leprae ML0004 · 77.2% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0004 · 78.6% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_0004 · 70.4% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000004 · 98.9% identity
M. abscessus MAB_0005 · 73.1% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WFL1 SwissProt · reviewed · Inferred from homology
UniProt nameUPF0232 protein Rv0004

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as UPF0232 protein Rv0004; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionBelongs to the UPF0232 family
Orthologous groupCOG5512

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 7 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 2 consensus substitution(s)
low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 82.2% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 11/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 55.8%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

The two screens disagree on this gene: Tn-seq says non-essential (NE), CRISPRi says essential, with an estimate its own authors flag as not certain.

Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is one its own authors flag as NOT certain (vulnerability index -4.379), so it is the weaker of the two calls. Do not treat the CRISPRi essentiality as settled here. Atlas-wide, 104 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 8 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 8 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.375, mean read count 144. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 8 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatRead with some caution: only 8 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 8 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 6 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance2.47 ppm · rank 3128/3519 (11.1th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length187 aa
Molecular weight19.9 kDa
Theoretical pI11.61
GRAVY-0.499 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index77.9
Aromaticity0.032
Instability index31.2 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DciAPF05258.18 4.5e-2475–162 Dna[CI] antecedent, DciA

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 77.2, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 77.2

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
7ykm-assembly1_A 1.00 0.89 0.38 0.85 25% 41% / 95% 1.2e-05 sig 7ykm-assembly1_A Structure of DciA DUF721 domain from Deinococcus radiodurans
8a3v-assembly1_C 1.00 0.62 0.32 0.39 11% 48% / 56% 2.0e-03 sig 8a3v-assembly1_C Crystal structure of the Vibrio cholerae replicative helicase (VcDnaB) in complex with its loader protein (VcDciA)

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 77.2, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3

Upstream (5' on genome)recF (+ strand, -4 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)gyrB (+ strand, 242 bp gap)
Predicted operon dnaN · recF · Rv0004

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0004) exponential phase: operon of 6, Rv0002 · Rv0003 · Rv0004 · Rv0005 · Rv0006 · Rv0007 (coverage 100.91)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (3 TF) Rv0023 (represses) · Rv0047c (activates) · Rv0324 (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: recF (DNA replication/repair protein RecF), high confidence (score 903, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 36 partners at medium confidence (6 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 36 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0003 recF DNA replication/repair protein RecF 931 903 ctx neighborhood:881
Rv0002 dnaN DNA polymerase III subunit beta 910 874 ctx neighborhood:855
Rv0005 gyrB DNA gyrase subunit B 797 785 ctx neighborhood:727
Rv0007 membrane protein 704 704 ctx neighborhood:635
Rv2256c dark hypothetical protein 686 686 ctx cooccurence:685
Rv2050 rbpA RNA polymerase-binding protein RbpA 653 653 ctx cooccurence:652
Rv2708c hypothetical protein 630 630 ctx cooccurence:630
Rv2413c hypothetical protein 811 618 ctx cooccurence:605 textmining:528
Rv1830 HTH-type transcriptional regulator 618 618 ctx cooccurence:616
Rv0807 hypothetical protein 607 608 ctx cooccurence:604
Rv1002c pmt dolichyl-phosphate-mannose--protein mannosyltransferase 592 592 ctx cooccurence:592
Rv2146c transmembrane protein 586 587 ctx cooccurence:584
Rv2699c dark hypothetical protein 583 584 ctx cooccurence:582
Rv0006 gyrA DNA gyrase subunit A 553 534 ctx neighborhood:528
Rv1321 nucS endonuclease NucS 650 525 ctx cooccurence:521

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • MTBC0 PGAP product: 'DNA replication protein DciA' (was 'hypothetical protein' in the legacy H37Rv/Mycobrowser annotation)
  • ESM SAE top features describe N-terminal basic RNA/DNA-binding patches and charged low-complexity segments, consistent with a nucleic-acid-binding protein
  • Primary literature: Rv0004 is essential and binds DnaB, modulating DnaB-DnaA complex formation

ESM Atlas signal (exploratory)

Ancestral protein hash adfddfac6808f01e0815b66dcb7890c3 · 10 ESM-space neighbours (max similarity 0.921). SAE features are orienting indices, not validated domains.

#IndexActivationInterpretation
18624 0.85 Presequence-to-core transition helix
24008 0.75 N-terminal basic RNA-binding patches
314994 0.71 Charged low-complexity disordered tails
41968 0.66 Basic low-complexity N-termini
514146 0.62 Edge beta-hairpin interaction loops
615621 0.59 Short basic Zn-binding helices
7507 0.55 Short cytosolic amphipathic helices
85321 0.55 N-terminal leader/capping segments

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214518.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DciA (PF05258.18)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG5512
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WFL1 (SwissProt, reviewed; Inferred from homology)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 77.2)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 36 functional partner(s); context anchor recF
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: Mann KM, Huang DL, Hooppaw AJ, et al. (2017). Rv0004 is a new essential member of the mycobacterial DNA replication machinery PLoS Genetics. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007115 PMID:29176877
  • Primary literature: Brézellec P, et al. (2022). DciA helicase operators exhibit diversity across bacterial phyla Journal of Bacteriology. doi:10.1128/jb.00163-22

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000004|Rv0004|
MTGSVDRPDQNRGERSMKSPGLDLVRRTLDEARAAARARGQDAGRGRVASVASGRVAGRRRSWSGPGPDIRDPQPLGKAARELAKKRGWSVRVAEGMVLGQWSAVVGHQIAEHARPTALNDGVLSVIAESTAWATQLRIMQAQLLAKIAAAVGNDVVRSLKITGPAAPSWRKGPRHIAGRGPRDTYG