Rv1761c Family assigned · low

H37Rv Rv1761c · MTBC0 mtbc0_001876 · 127 aa · 2013063–2013446 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_216277.1

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • The page states a transmembrane helix that its own DeepTMHMM call does not find, and the experiment wins: solution NMR in DPC micelles resolves the 127-residue protein as one transmembrane helix plus a ~10 kDa extramembranous C-terminal domain (Page et al. 2009, Protein Sci, 10.1002/pro.24), and this atlas' independent Kyte-Doolittle second opinion also places an N-terminal hydrophobic segment. The prediction is kept as produced rather than hand-overwritten, because a layer whose provenance says DeepTMHMM must keep saying what DeepTMHMM said; read the structure, not the prediction, on this locus. (text vs localization, 2026-09-11)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDUF5073 family protein
Revised (this work)DUF5073 family protein, and an experimentally characterised single-pass membrane protein: solution NMR in DPC micelles gives the backbone structure of the 127-residue protein as one transmembrane helix followed by a ~10 kDa extramembranous C-terminal domain (Page et al. 2009, Protein Sci, 10.1002/pro.24). This atlas' DeepTMHMM call (globular, no helix, no signal peptide) is contradicted by that experiment, and by its own Kyte-Doolittle second opinion, which does place an N-terminal hydrophobic segment centred on residue 20; the prediction is kept as produced and flagged here rather than silently overwritten. The inherited UniProt name «Possible exported protein» is right in substance, for the wrong reason: this is a membrane protein, not a secreted one.
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Curation note: 2026-09-11 (P46.3): function_revised rewritten. Previous text replaced, kept here as a citation: «DUF5073 family protein.» Reason: P46.3: the sentence stated only the family and let the record assert export through its inherited name alongside a globular prediction; the published NMR structure settles it and exposes a predictor error.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 2 publications

Found under: H37Rv (2).

2 TB publications mention this gene. 2 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

PublicationDate
Backbone structure of a small helical integral membrane protein: A unique structural characterization. doi:10.1002/pro.24 2009
Genomic diversity among Beijing and non-Beijing Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Myanmar. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001973 2008
2 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv1761c, Mb1792c, MMAR_2636 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Backbone structure of a small helical integral membrane protein: A unique structural characterization. doi:10.1002/pro.24 Protein Sci 2009
Genomic diversity among Beijing and non-Beijing Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Myanmar. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001973 PLoS One 2008

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourRv1762c (Rv1762c, - strand)
Overlap1 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): PyrR (pyrR).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.87 (95% CI -0.40 to 3.01). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.359 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1792c · 100.0% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2636 · 66.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O06796 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt namePossible exported protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionDomain of unknown function (DUF5073)
Orthologous group2B28X

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.72 · quasi-invariant (3 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 1 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.362 (low power) · 2 consensus substitution(s)
low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 33/53 (62%) · mean identity 71.5% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 33/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 6 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 6 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 115.666666667. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 6 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatRead with some caution: only 6 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 6 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 9 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance56.1 ppm · rank 1681/3519 (52.3th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Localisation (measured + predicted) experimentally localised

An experimental structure contradicts the topology predicted on this page
Measured localisationsingle-pass membrane protein: one transmembrane helix followed by a ~10 kDa extramembranous C-terminal domain
Method
  • solution NMR backbone structure of the 127-residue protein in dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles, 590 distance, dihedral and orientational restraints, backbone rmsd 1.16 A and transmembrane domain defined at 0.40 A
Against the predictionthe experiment contradicts the predicted topology below; read the experiment

The prediction on this page is wrong on this locus, and the structure says so: solution NMR resolves one transmembrane helix plus a ~10 kDa extramembranous C-terminal domain, where DeepTMHMM calls no helix and no signal peptide. This atlas' own independent Kyte-Doolittle second opinion agrees with the experiment and places an N-terminal hydrophobic segment centred on residue 20. The prediction is kept as produced rather than hand-overwritten — a layer whose provenance says DeepTMHMM must keep saying what DeepTMHMM said — so read the structure, not the prediction, on this gene.

Limits of this measurement. The authors themselves note that the structural model is influenced by the membrane mimetic, and that the fold of a small integral membrane protein is dictated by the sequence together with its environment: a DPC micelle is not a mycobacterial membrane, and the extramembranous domain's orientation should not be read as settled.

Source: Page et al. 2009, Protein Sci 18:134-146 (PMID 19177358), doi 10.1002/pro.24; established as this locus' contradiction in P46.3 (2026-09-11).

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length127 aa
Molecular weight13.5 kDa
Theoretical pI6.91
GRAVY0.302 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index107.6
Aromaticity0.071
Instability index24.9 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DUF5073PF16817.12 5.1e-641–120 Domain of unknown function (DUF5073)

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 2k3m (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 1 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
2k3m Solution NMR — 100%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (1 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1760 (+ strand, 9 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv1762c (- strand, -1 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv1761c · Rv1762c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv1761c · Rv1762c — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1810) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv1761c · Rv1762c (coverage 17.67)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (2 TF) Rv0302 (represses) · espR (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1762c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 887, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 11 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1762c hypothetical protein 887 887 ctx neighborhood:881
Rv1754c hypothetical protein 555 55 textmining:549
Rv2212 adenylyl cyclase 514 47 textmining:511
Rv1585c phage protein 659 42 textmining:659
Rv1765c hypothetical protein 658 41 textmining:658
Rv0071 maturase 556 41 textmining:556
Rv1647 adenylate cyclase 511 41 textmining:511
Rv1318c adenylate cyclase 439 41 textmining:439
Rv1320c adenylate cyclase 436 41 textmining:436
Rv1319c adenylate cyclase 434 41 textmining:434
Rv1264 adenylyl cyclase 433 41 textmining:433

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF5073 family protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DUF5073 PF16817.12 (E=5e-64)
  • (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216277.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF5073 (PF16817.12)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2B28X
  • Curated reference: UniProt O06796 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 88.7)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 11 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1762c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Measured localisation: Page et al. 2009, Protein Sci 18:134-146 (PMID 19177358), doi 10.1002/pro.24; established as this locus' contradiction in P46.3 (2026-09-11). Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001876|Rv1761c|
MSDFDTERVSRAVAAALVGPGGVALVVKVFAGLPGVIHTPARRGFFRSNPERIQIGDWRYEVAHDGRLLAAHMVNGIVIAEDALIAEAVGPHLARALGQIVSRYGATVIPNINAAIEVLGTGTDYRF