Rv1730c Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1730c · MTBC0 mtbc0_001842 · 517 aa · 1967764–1969317 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_216246.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand Rv1717 (Rv1717) — family_assigned: cupin domain-containing protein Rv1718 (Rv1718) — requalified: 3-keto-5-aminohexanoate cleavage protein Rv1719 (Rv1719) — family_assigned: IclR family transcriptional regulator vapC12 (Rv1720c) — family_assigned: type II toxin-antitoxin system VapC family toxin vapB12 (Rv1721c) — requalified: antitoxin Rv1722 (Rv1722) — requalified: biotin carboxylase Rv1722 Rv1723 (Rv1723) — requalified: serine hydrolase Rv1723 Rv1724c (Rv1724c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv1725c (Rv1725c) — family_assigned: winged helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulator Rv1726 (Rv1726) — requalified: FAD-binding oxidoreductase Rv1726 Rv1727 (Rv1727) — family_assigned: TIGR03086 family metal-binding protein Rv1728c (Rv1728c) — requalified: glycoside hydrolase Rv1729c (Rv1729c) — requalified: class I SAM-dependent methyltransferase Rv1729c Rv1730c (Rv1730c) — family_assigned: serine hydrolase domain-containing protein Rv1730c gabD2 (Rv1731) — requalified: succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase gabD2 Rv1732c (Rv1732c) — family_assigned: thioredoxin family protein Rv1733c (Rv1733c) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein narX (Rv1736c) — family_assigned: respiratory nitrate reductase subunit gamma narX narK2 (Rv1737c) — requalified: nitrate transporter NarK narK2 Rv1738 (Rv1738) — family_assigned: DUF1876 domain-containing protein Rv1739c (Rv1739c) — family_assigned: SulP family inorganic anion transporter Rv1739c vapB34 (Rv1740) — family_assigned: type II toxin-antitoxin system VapB family antitoxin vapC34 (Rv1741) — family_assigned: type II toxin-antitoxin system VapC family toxin Rv1742 (Rv1742) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein 1 960 kb 1 964 kb 1 968 kb 1 972 kb 1 976 kb 1 980 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)penicillin-binding protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationserine hydrolase domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Serine hydrolase domain-containing protein. Pfam: Beta-lactamase (PF00144.30).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication discusses this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 1 record carries a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Penicillin Binding Proteins and β-Lactamases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Reexamination of the Historical Paradigm. doi:10.1128/msphere.00039-22 2022
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv1730c, Mb1759c, MMAR_1674 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Penicillin Binding Proteins and β-Lactamases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Reexamination of the Historical Paradigm. doi:10.1128/msphere.00039-22 mSphere 2022

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.57 (95% CI -0.39 to 5.05). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.254 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=12 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionThought to be involved in cell wall biosynthesis and may also act as a sensor of external penicillins

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1759c · 99.8% identity
M. marinum MMAR_1674 · 27.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001810 · 99.8% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P71988 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt namePossible penicillin-binding protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category V Defense mechanisms
eggNOG descriptionBeta-lactamase
Orthologous groupCOG1680

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS 0.828 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 4 synonymous, 9 missense, 1 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 21.40% of strains (30514) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — L2, L4; union over all sites: 30 771 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:1955913:CCGGAAGTCGATGACCGTTG:T · frameshift · 30 514 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of L2, totalling 35 405 strains — 92.7% of the 38 190 strains in the lineage named (largest: L2.2.1 30513/35405)
  • NC_000962.3:1956690:A:C · nonsense · 257 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of L4, totalling 257 strains — 0.5% of the 54 538 strains in the lineage named (largest: L4.13 257/257)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 4 consensus substitution(s)
low power (4 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 19/53 (36%) · mean identity 67.8% · 1/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (19/53 NTM; in 1 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 3/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 31.3%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 31 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 31 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.774, mean read count 33.5416666667. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 31 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Enzyme activity (activity-based protein profiling) active serine hydrolase confirms atlas call high-confidence target

Directly labelled by a fluorophosphonate activity-based probe in live M. tuberculosis: biochemical proof that this protein is a catalytically active serine hydrolase, not merely a predicted fold. This experimentally corroborates the atlas assignment (Serine hydrolase domain-containing protein. Pfam: Beta-lactamase (PF00144.30).), which was derived independently from structure and orthology.

Source annotationRv1730c Penicillin-binding protein (cell wall & cell processes)
Probe enrichment20.0× over no-probe control (20 = capped maximum)
Covalent-inhibitor competition20.0× (probe labelling blocked by a serine-hydrolase inhibitor)
Active / prioritized atpH 6.6 (growth condition)
Covalent-inhibitor targetLalistat, CyC17 (chemically addressable active site)

experimental (activity-based) confirmation of the atlas serine-hydrolase family assignment; proves the enzyme is catalytically active in live M. tuberculosis. It never changes the verdict here. Source: Li M, Patel HV, ..., Canaan S, Aldridge BB et al., Cell Chem Biol 2021 (PMC8964833; doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.09.002); competitive activity-based protein profiling of FP-reactive serine hydrolases.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 12 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance52.3 ppm · rank 1724/3519 (51.0th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length517 aa
Molecular weight55.8 kDa
Theoretical pI6.38
GRAVY-0.216 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index78.1
Aromaticity0.081
Instability index25.8 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Beta-lactamasePF00144.30 4.2e-7460–383 Beta-lactamase

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 88.3, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 88.3

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
7spn-assembly1_B 1.00 0.88 0.78 0.88 40% 90% / 98% 2.3e-46 sig 7spn-assembly1_B Crystal structure of IS11, a thermophilic esterase
6ksu-assembly2_B 1.00 0.78 0.67 0.78 25% 90% / 100% 1.5e-28 sig 6ksu-assembly2_B Crystal structure of SurE
6ksv-assembly2_B 1.00 0.80 0.67 0.80 25% 90% / 100% 1.2e-27 sig 6ksv-assembly2_B Crystal structure of SurE with D-Leu
6ksu-assembly1_A 1.00 0.77 0.67 0.77 25% 90% / 100% 1.9e-27 sig 6ksu-assembly1_A Crystal structure of SurE
6ksv-assembly1_A 1.00 0.75 0.63 0.75 24% 90% / 100% 2.1e-27 sig 6ksv-assembly1_A Crystal structure of SurE with D-Leu

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 88.3, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1729c (- strand, 122 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)gabD2 (+ strand, 431 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1771) expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 37.66)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) Rv1404 (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1728c (hypothetical protein), medium confidence (score 535, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 27 partners at medium confidence (2 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 27 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1728c hypothetical protein 535 535 ctx neighborhood:528
Rv1729c S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase 525 524 ctx neighborhood:517
Rv1923 lipD lipase LipD 496 497 ctx cooccurence:495
Rv2000 hypothetical protein 466 466 ctx cooccurence:462
Rv1723 hydrolase 418 419 ctx cooccurence:415
Rv1367c paralog hypothetical protein 500 283
Rv2407 rnz ribonuclease Z 673 80 textmining:660
Rv0050 ponA1 bifunctional penicillin-insensitive transglycosylase/penicillin-sensitive transpeptidase 610 69 textmining:599
Rv3682 ponA2 bifunctional penicillin-insensitive transglycosylase/penicillin-sensitive transpeptidase 484 66 textmining:470
Rv0712 hypothetical protein 559 61 textmining:550
Rv0016c pbpA penicillin-binding protein PbpA 672 55 textmining:668
Rv1263 amiB2 amidase AmiB 660 52 textmining:657
Rv3627c dacB hypothetical protein 541 51 textmining:537
Rv2864c penicillin-binding lipoprotein 469 50 textmining:465
Rv2166c mraZ transcriptional regulator MraZ 654 49 textmining:652

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: penicillin-binding protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: serine hydrolase domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Beta-lactamase PF00144.30 (E=4e-74)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216246.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Beta-lactamase (PF00144.30)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1680
  • Curated reference: UniProt P71988 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 88.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 27 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1728c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001842|Rv1730c|
MCPPIILSSATPTGTRCGTRHGRAVVTEYVRALDRLPHEIATAVVETVNCADPGAAFDELDAKINAGMKAYAIPGVAVAVWAGGQEYVKGYGVTNVDHPMPVDGDTVFRIGSTTKTFTGTVMMRLVERGKVDLDSPVRRYIPDFAVADESASATVTVRQLLNHTAGWDGRNGQDFGRGDDAVALYVKAMTRLPQLTPPGTAFAYNNSGLVVAGRIIELVAGTTYESTVQRLLLDPLQLAHTRYFSDQIIGLNVAASHSVVDGKPIAVTDFWTFPRSCNPTGGLMSTARDQLRYAQFHLGDGRAPNGEQILSRQSLKAMRSNPGAGGTLWVELTGMGVTWMLRPSAENVTIVEHGGTWKGQRSGFVMVPDRNFAMTVLTNSDGGFHMINDLFASDWALQRFAGLSNLPATPQRLGAVDLAPYEGRYIAKQVAQNGDLETTVIDFRARDGQLAGSMSTDDANPDGQNSANLGLAFYRPDYGLDLGPDNKPTGSRSNFVRGPDGNIAWFCSQHGRLFRRQ