Rv1524 Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1524 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001631 · 414 aa · 1728535–1729779 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_216040.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)glycosyltransferase
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationglycosyltransferase
Revised (this work)Glycosyltransferase. Pfam: Glyco_transf_28 (PF03033.27), EryCIII-like_C (PF06722.19).
Functional category (TubercuList)intermediary metabolism and respiration

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) studied as much outside M. tuberculosis

The biology of this gene is documented at least as much outside M. tuberculosis as within it — 4 record(s) in a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the verified sample: M. marinum 1, M. smegmatis 3) versus 2 in a TB context, two separate queries. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is “known” about this gene is known by proxy.

Caveat: IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge.

4 TB publications mention this gene. 4 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). **Its biology is documented at least as much OUTSIDE M. tuberculosis as within it**: queried separately, 4 records carry a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 4-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (3), M. marinum (1)) against 2 with a M. tuberculosis context. The context counts come from distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they are not parts of the total above and need not add up to it. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is 'known' about this gene is known by proxy. reformulation, not a quotation

PublicationDate
Identification of genes associated with persistence in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1302883 2024
Insertion Mutation of MSMEG_0392 Play an Important Role in Resistance of M. smegmatis to Mycobacteriophage SWU1. doi:10.2147/IDR.S341494 2022
Orphan response regulator Rv3143 increases antibiotic sensitivity by regulating cell wall permeability in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2020.108522 2020
Mycobacterium marinum mmar_2318 and mmar_2319 are Responsible for Lipooligosaccharide Biosynthesis and Virulence Toward Dictyostelium. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01458 2015
1 record returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 4 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv1524, Mb1551, ML2348, MMAR_2353, MSMEG_0392, MAB_4112c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Orphan response regulator Rv3143 increases antibiotic sensitivity by regulating cell wall permeability in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2020.108522 Arch Biochem Biophys 2020

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -0.21 (95% CI -3.66 to 4.92). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.086 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser EC 2.4.-.- · agrees with the atlas

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1551 · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML2348 · 62.9% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2353 · 60.1% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_0392 · 58.4% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001611 · 99.8% identity
M. abscessus MAB_4112c · 59.3% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WN07 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized glycosyltransferase Rv1524
EC (curated) EC 2.4.-.-

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized glycosyltransferase Rv1524; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category C Energy production and conversion
G Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
eggNOG descriptionCOG1819 Glycosyl transferases, related to UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
Orthologous groupCOG1819
EC number EC 2.4.1.173
KEGG orthology K05841
CAZy family GT1
Gene Ontology (14) GO:0003674, GO:0003824, GO:0005575, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0008194, GO:0016740, GO:0016757, GO:0043226, GO:0043227, GO:0043229, GO:0043231 +2 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.128 · strong purifying
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 11 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.26% of strains (367) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) site unique fixé — L6; union over all sites: 556 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:1719107:CG:C · frameshift · 367 strains — fixed in 13 sub-clades of L6, totalling 330 strains — 22.7% of the 1 457 strains in the lineage named (largest: L6.2.1.2.2.3 74/74, L6.2.1.2.2.2.2.2 56/56, L6.2.1.2.2.1 33/33, L6.2.1.2.2.2.2.1 29/29, L6.2.1.1 25/25, L6.2.1.2.1 20/20, …)
  • NC_000962.3:1719950:CA:C · frameshift · 189 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.351 (low power) · 2 consensus substitution(s)
low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 63.3% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 2/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 45.9%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
147c 85% L1, Chimpanze n=1, not statistical
DS4 85% L1, Chimpanze n=1, not statistical
RD307 75% L5 (56%)

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 14 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 14 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 44.9285714286. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 14 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance14.6 ppm · rank 2506/3519 (28.8th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length414 aa
Molecular weight44.4 kDa
Theoretical pI6.77
GRAVY0.083 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index94.2
Aromaticity0.068
Instability index38.7 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Glyco_transf_28PF03033.27 1.9e-083–84 Glycosyltransferase family 28 N-terminal domain
EryCIII-like_CPF06722.19 2.3e-13295–396 Erythromycin biosynthesis protein CIII-like, C-terminal domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 93.1, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 93.1

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
1iir-assembly1_A 1.00 0.84 0.78 0.84 26% 100% / 100% 5.8e-28 sig 1iir-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of UDP-glucosyltransferase GtfB
3h4t-assembly1_A 1.00 0.79 0.75 0.79 27% 99% / 98% 8.9e-27 sig 3h4t-assembly1_A Chimeric Glycosyltransferase for the generation of novel natural products - GtfAH1 in complex with UDP-2F-Glc
1rrv-assembly2_B 1.00 0.79 0.76 0.79 23% 99% / 100% 2.0e-26 sig 1rrv-assembly2_B X-ray crystal structure of TDP-vancosaminyltransferase GtfD as a complex with TDP and the natural substrate, desvancosaminyl vancomycin.
1pnv-assembly1_A 1.00 0.81 0.75 0.81 25% 99% / 99% 5.5e-24 sig 1pnv-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of TDP-epi-Vancosaminyltransferase GtfA in complexes with TDP and Vancomycin
1pn3-assembly1_A 1.00 0.81 0.77 0.81 24% 100% / 100% 1.2e-23 sig 1pn3-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of TDP-epi-Vancosaminyltransferase GtfA in complexes with TDP and the acceptor substrate DVV.

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 93.1, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1523 (+ strand, 29 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)wbbL2 (+ strand, 46 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv1523 · Rv1524 · wbbL2

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1575) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv1523 · Rv1524 (coverage 24.97)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1523 (methyltransferase), high confidence (score 898, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 24 partners at medium confidence (4 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 24 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1523 methyltransferase 898 898 ctx neighborhood:721 coexpression:651
Rv1525 wbbL2 rhamnosyl transferase WbbL 751 742 ctx neighborhood:670
Rv1182 papA3 acyltransferase papA3 636 621 ctx cooccurence:608
Rv3824c papA1 acyltransferase 627 612 ctx cooccurence:600
Rv3820c papA2 trehalose-2-sulfate acyltransferase 619 603 ctx cooccurence:589
Rv1522c mmpL12 transmembrane transport protein MmpL12 526 509 ctx neighborhood:497
Rv0295c stf0 hypothetical protein 498 499 ctx cooccurence:493
Rv0764c cyp51 lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase 489 477
Rv1851 ureF urease accessory protein UreF 421 422 ctx cooccurence:413
Rv0063 oxidoreductase 421 422
Rv1181 pks4 polyketide beta-ketoacyl synthase 430 402
Rv2226 hypothetical protein 400 401
Rv2946c pks1 polyketide synthase 406 372
Rv0519c membrane protein 403 372
Rv3351c hypothetical protein 902 277 textmining:870

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: glycosyltransferase
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: glycosyltransferase
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Glyco_transf_28 PF03033.27 (E=2e-08), EryCIII-like_C PF06722.19 (E=2e-13)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216040.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Glyco_transf_28 (PF03033.27), EryCIII-like_C (PF06722.19)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1819
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WN07 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 93.1)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 24 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1523
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001631|Rv1524|
MKFVVASYGTRGDIEPCAAVGLELQRRGHDVCLAVPPNLIGFVETAGLSAVAYGSRDSQEQLDEQFLHNAWKLQNPIKLLREAMAPVTEGWAELSAMLTPVAAGADLLLTGQIYQEVVANVAEHHGIPLAALHFYPVRANGEIAFPARLPAPLVRSTITAIDWLYWRMTKGVEDAQRRELGLPKASTPAPRRMAVRGSLEIQAYDALCFPGLAAEWGGRRPFVGALTMESATDADDEVASWIAADTPPIYFGFGSMPIGSLADRVAMISAACAELGERALICSGPSDATGIPQFDHVKVVRVVSHAAVFPTCRAVVHHGGAGTTAAGLRAGIPTLILWVTSDQPIWAAQIKQLKVGRGRRFSSATKESLIADLRTILAPDYVTRAREIASRMTKPAASVTATADLLEDAARRAR