Rv0666 Still unknown · low auto-curated
H37Rv Rv0666 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000704 ·
57 aa ·
763222–763395 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_215180.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | membrane protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | Conserved hypothetical protein; no recognised domain. Function unknown. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) never studied
No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). This gene is genuinely unstudied: its darkness reflects absence of investigation, not failure of investigation.
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) dark by construction (IDR-orphan)
| Predicted disorder | 100% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 51.8 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 57 aa [0-57] |
both sequence (metapredict) and structure (low AlphaFold pLDDT) indicate little stable globular structure: this gene is dark BY CONSTRUCTION — there is no confident fold for structure/homology search to match, so its obscurity is expected, not a pipeline failure
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 2 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv0665 (Rv0665, + strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 2 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb0685
· 98.2% identity |
|---|---|
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_000702
· 98.2% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O06773
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Predicted
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Possible membrane protein |
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 0/53 (0%)
· 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives absent from ALL 53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes tested (incl. the closest MTBAP relatives) — a candidate MTBC-specific genetic innovation / host-adaptation factor (confirm by synteny; rule out a short/low-complexity ORF and extreme divergence) |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria short ORF (57 aa) a shallow stratum may reflect homology-detection failure, not true youth absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs) |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | Uncertain · uncertain |
|---|---|
| What the call means | uncertain (short or TA-poor ORF): no call possible |
| Caveat | Statistically thin call: only 0 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected
Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence: low-abundance, condition-specific, or MS-refractory proteins (e.g. small, highly hydrophobic, or repetitive PE/PPE families with few tryptic peptides) are systematically under-sampled.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) signal peptide
| Prediction | predicted secreted protein (signal peptide) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | SP |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 57 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 5.8 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 8.68 |
| GRAVY | 0.172 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 77.0 |
| Aromaticity | 0.018 |
| Instability index | 55.0 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (or not yet scanned).
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4
| Upstream (5' on genome) | vapC8 (+ strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | rpoB (+ strand, 497 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
atsD · vapB8 · vapC8 · Rv0666
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
kstR (activates)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a strong physiological-context lead.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = hypothetical; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: vapC8 (ribonuclease VapC8), high confidence from genomic context alone (score 790 excluding text-mining).
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0665 vapC8 |
ribonuclease VapC8 | 790 | 790 ctx | neighborhood:781 |
Rv0664 vapB8 |
antitoxin VapB8 | 787 | 788 ctx | neighborhood:781 |
Rv0663 atsD |
arylsulfatase AtsD | 671 | 672 ctx | neighborhood:668 |
Rv0661c vapC7 |
ribonuclease VapC7 | 478 | 478 ctx | neighborhood:473 |
Rv0662c vapB7 |
antitoxin VapB7 | 474 | 475 ctx | neighborhood:473 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The exp badge marks an experimentally-supported partner (measured interaction, experimental/database channel ≥400) as opposed to a purely predicted one — but note that the M. tuberculosis experimental interactome is dominated by a noisy bacterial-two-hybrid screen, so a strong measured link that contradicts the operon/localisation context is likely a false positive. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: membrane protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: hypothetical protein
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215180.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Curated reference: UniProt O06773 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
5 functional partner(s); context anchor
vapC8 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_000704|Rv0666| MTPRTDEGAAAPCLMPDVTMPVKRGDARGALGVGPALFVVSVSSSLVRARSCRCTAD
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv0666? Email the maintainer — the message is pre-filled with this gene's details.