Rv0567 Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv0567 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000597 · 339 aa · 661872–662891 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_215081.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)methyltransferase/methylase
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationmethyltransferase
Revised (this work)Methyltransferase. Pfam: Dimerisation (PF08100.19), Methyltransf_2 (PF00891.25), Methyltransf_23 (PF13489.13), MTS (PF05175.21), Methyltransf_12 (PF08242.19), Methyltransf_25 (PF13649.13), Methyltransf_11 (PF08241.19).
Functional category (TubercuList)intermediary metabolism and respiration

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication discusses this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 1 record carries a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Proteomics of Culture Filtrate of Prevalent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains: 2D-PAGE Map and MALDI-TOF/MS Analysis. doi:10.1177/2472555217717639 2017
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv0567, Mb0582, MMAR_0934 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Proteomics of Culture Filtrate of Prevalent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains: 2D-PAGE Map and MALDI-TOF/MS Analysis. doi:10.1177/2472555217717639 SLAS Discov 2017

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.20 (95% CI -1.44 to 4.68). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.291 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=14 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionCauses methylation
Mycobrowser EC 2.1.1.-

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0582 · 99.4% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0934 · 79.9% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000596 · 99.4% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O53764 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameProbable methyltransferase/methylase

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category Q Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
eggNOG descriptionDimerisation domain
Orthologous groupCOG0500

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 1.31 · diversifying/relaxed
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 7 missense, 1 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.40% of strains (565) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) aucun site fixé dans un clade; union over all sites: 709 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:658643:C:A · nonsense · 565 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:659135:CA:C · frameshift · 144 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.328 (low power) · 2 consensus substitution(s)
low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 10/53 (19%) · mean identity 68.8% · 2/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (10/53 NTM; in 2 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 20 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 20 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.950, mean read count 233.052631579. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 20 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance14.0 ppm · rank 2525/3519 (28.3th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length339 aa
Molecular weight37.1 kDa
Theoretical pI5.15
GRAVY-0.065 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index90.6
Aromaticity0.088
Instability index42.4 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DimerisationPF08100.19 1.7e-0814–88 O-methyltransferase dimerisation domain
Methyltransf_2PF00891.25 2.0e-40111–321 O-methyltransferase domain
Methyltransf_23PF13489.13 1.2e-06157–321 Methyltransferase domain
MTSPF05175.21 1.1e-06161–275 Methyltransferase small domain
Methyltransf_12PF08242.19 1.1e-07177–271 Methyltransferase domain
Methyltransf_25PF13649.13 4.2e-07177–270 Methyltransferase domain
Methyltransf_11PF08241.19 6.9e-06177–274 Methyltransferase domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 95.3, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 95.3

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8tji-assembly1_B 1.00 0.96 0.92 0.96 43% 98% / 99% 1.4e-36 sig 8tji-assembly1_B SAM-dependent methyltransferase RedM, apo
8tjj-assembly1_A 1.00 0.95 0.89 0.95 42% 98% / 99% 2.4e-36 sig 8tjj-assembly1_A SAM-dependent methyltransferase RedM bound to SAM
8tjk-assembly1_A 1.00 0.96 0.91 0.96 42% 98% / 99% 2.7e-36 sig 8tjk-assembly1_A SAM-dependent methyltransferase RedM bound to SAH
8tjj-assembly2_B 1.00 0.93 0.88 0.93 43% 98% / 99% 2.1e-36 sig 8tjj-assembly2_B SAM-dependent methyltransferase RedM bound to SAM
8tjj-assembly2_C 1.00 0.93 0.91 0.93 43% 100% / 99% 1.5e-36 sig 8tjj-assembly2_C SAM-dependent methyltransferase RedM bound to SAM

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 95.3, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)tyrT (+ strand, 131 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)cyp135B1 (+ strand, 109 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0593) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv0567 · Rv0568 · Rv0569 (coverage 36.0)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 10.8) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: cyp135B1 (cytochrome P450 Cyp135B1), medium confidence (score 604, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.

All 9 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0568 cyp135B1 cytochrome P450 Cyp135B1 604 604 ctx neighborhood:513
Rv0566c hypothetical protein 429 429 ctx neighborhood:423
Rv0569 hypothetical protein 415 415
Rv1310 atpD ATP synthase subunit beta 590 157 textmining:534
Rv1415 ribA2 bifunctional riboflavin biosynthesis GTP cyclohydrolase II/3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate synthase 679 71 textmining:670
Rv3375 amiD amidase 864 47 textmining:864
Rv1911c lppC lipoprotein LppC 870 46 textmining:870
Rv1038c esxJ ESAT-6 like protein EsxJ 653 45 textmining:652
Rv2809 hypothetical protein 870 44 textmining:870

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: methyltransferase/methylase
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: methyltransferase
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Dimerisation PF08100.19 (E=2e-08), Methyltransf_2 PF00891.25 (E=2e-40), Methyltransf_23 PF13489.13 (E=1e-06), MTS PF05175.21 (E=1e-06), Methyltransf_12 PF08242.19 (E=1e-07), Methyltransf_25 PF13649.13 (E=4e-07), Methyltransf_11 PF08241.19 (E=7e-06)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215081.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Dimerisation (PF08100.19), Methyltransf_2 (PF00891.25), Methyltransf_23 (PF13489.13), MTS (PF05175.21), Methyltransf_12 (PF08242.19), Methyltransf_25 (PF13649.13), Methyltransf_11 (PF08241.19)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0500
  • Curated reference: UniProt O53764 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 95.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 9 functional partner(s); context anchor cyp135B1
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000597|Rv0567|
MELSPDRIMAIGGGYGPSKVLLTAVGLGLFTELGDEAMTAEAIADRLGLLKRPAIDFLDALVSLDLLARDGDGPGSHYRNTPETAHFLDEARPTYAGGLLKIWNERNYRFWADLTEALKTGKAQSEVKQTGRPFFEALYADPRRLEAFMAAMDAASRRNIELLAKRFPFERYRRLCDVGCADGLLSRIVAAAHPHLQCVSFDLPAVTEIARRKLTAEGLGERVQACAGDFLADPLPAADVITMGQILHDWNLDRKQQLVAKAYEALSKEGAFIVIETLIDDARRENTTGLMMSLNMLIEFGDAFDYSAADFRGWCGEAGFRSFEVIPLAGGSSAAVAYK