esxC Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3890c · MTBC0 mtbc0_004124 · 95 aa · 4397972–4398259 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_218407.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)ESAT-6 like protein EsxC
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationWXG100 family type VII secretion target
Revised (this work)WXG100 family type VII secretion target. Pfam: WXG100 (PF06013.19).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Curation note: [La4, 2026-09-27] Deletion complete et specifique du sous-clade WILD (5/25 souches echantillonnees) de la lignee animale rare La4 (soeur de M. caprae, sans rapport avec la lignee humaine L4) : les 9 genes contigus Rv3885c-Rv3893c ont mean_coverage=0 chez les 5 souches wild contre >70x chez les 20 souches du clade primate de la meme lignee et chez les genes flanquants Rv3883c/Rv3894c (couverts normalement dans les deux clades) -- deletion locus-specifique, pas un artefact de sequencage. Le clade primate de La4 porte en revanche le frameshift esxC/Rv3890c partage avec Bovis/L6/L9/Microti/Orygis_La3/Pinnipedii/Suricattae deja documente ici (meme site NC_000962.3:4373846:TG:T, heritage partage de l'ancetre du clade animal, PAS une convergence supplementaire). Point methodologique pour l'atlas : cette deletion complete est INVISIBLE au suivi de perturbation par SPDI/frameshift (un gene absent ne produit aucun appel de variant, donc aucun drapeau de perturbation n'est leve), contrairement a un frameshift ou une substitution -- verifie par couverture directe (report.json.genes[].mean_coverage), pas par variant calling. Source : Guyeux, manuscrit La4 soumis a Infection, Genetics and Evolution (2026-09-27), preprint HAL hal-05765936v1, bundle de reproductibilite cguyeux/deciphering-tuberculosis-with-ai (La4/resultats/phase7/esx2_summary.md).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 4 publications

4 TB publications mention this gene. 4 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 5 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Chemical and Biological Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific ESAT6-Like Proteins and Their Potentials in the Prevention of Tuberculosis and Asthma. doi:10.1159/000534002 2023
Substrate Interaction with the EssC Coupling Protein of the Type VIIb Secretion System. doi:10.1128/JB.00646-19 2020
Genome-wide DNA methylation and transcriptome and proteome changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with para-aminosalicylic acid resistance. doi:10.1111/cbdd.13625 2020
Tuberculosis vaccine with high predicted population coverage and compatibility with modern diagnostics. doi:10.1073/pnas.1314973111 2014
Secretion of atypical protein substrates by the ESAT-6 secretion system of Staphylococcus aureus. doi:10.1111/mmi.12395 2013
5 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 4 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv3890c, esxC, Mb3919c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Chemical and Biological Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific ESAT6-Like Proteins and Their Potentials in the Prevention of Tuberculosis and Asthma. doi:10.1159/000534002 Med Princ Pract 2023
Substrate Interaction with the EssC Coupling Protein of the Type VIIb Secretion System. doi:10.1128/JB.00646-19 J Bacteriol 2020
Genome-wide DNA methylation and transcriptome and proteome changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with para-aminosalicylic acid resistance. doi:10.1111/cbdd.13625 Chem Biol Drug Des 2020
Tuberculosis vaccine with high predicted population coverage and compatibility with modern diagnostics. doi:10.1073/pnas.1314973111 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014
Secretion of atypical protein substrates by the ESAT-6 secretion system of Staphylococcus aureus. doi:10.1111/mmi.12395 Mol Microbiol 2013

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -0.38 (95% CI -0.64 to -0.13). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain (their own confidence call, not a p-value threshold). Its guide library did sample a range of repression strengths (str_span=0.696 on a 0-1 scale, thanks to at least one guide <=18 nt; n_guides=19 descriptive only), so the dose-response fit is not starved of titration the way most 'not certain' genes are -- the uncertainty here is the authors' own confidence call on the fit, not a design limitation of the guide library. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim without checking `certain` first.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3919c · 87.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WNI1 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameESAT-6-like protein EsxC

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
Preferred nameesxC
eggNOG descriptionBelongs to the WXG100 family
Orthologous groupCOG4842

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 10.46% of strains (14917) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Bovis, L6, L9, La4, Microti, Orygis_La3, Pinnipedii, Suricattae; union over all sites: 15 533 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:4373846:TG:T · frameshift · 14 917 strains — fixed in 411 sub-clades of Bovis, L6, L9, La4, Microti, Orygis_La3, Pinnipedii, Suricattae, totalling 14 526 strains — 96.2% of the 15 096 strains in the lineages named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.2.9 1758/1763, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.3 479/480, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.3.3 346/346, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.2 314/315, Bovis.2.1.2.2.2.1.3.2.2.2 249/249, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.1 244/244, …)
  • NC_000962.3:4373854:GA:G · frameshift · 616 strains — fixed in 10 sub-clades of Bovis, Orygis_La3, totalling 242 strains — 1.8% of the 13 526 strains in the lineages named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.1.2.1 78/93, Orygis_La3.2.2.2.2.2.2.2 61/61, Bovis.2.2.1.2.1.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.2 25/25, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.2.5.1.2 17/17, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.2.5.1.1.2 13/13, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.2.5.1 12/12, …)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 39/53 (74%) · mean identity 70.2% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 39/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 11/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria)
domain-level detected through its Pfam domain PF06013, not as a full-length homolog
its Pfam domain PF06013 is detected by profile search (hmmsearch, gathering threshold) down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls), while the full-length protein is not detected there by tblastn — the DOMAIN family is ancient and widespread; this does not establish a conserved ortholog of this gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RDcap_Spain7 100% Caprae (83%)
RDbovis_Δpan 100% Caprae
252b 18% Caprae

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 6 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 6 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.833, mean read count 239.2. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 6 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatRead with some caution: only 6 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 6 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 11 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance381.0 ppm · rank 525/3519 (85.1th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length95 aa
Molecular weight9.9 kDa
Theoretical pI4.36
GRAVY-0.084 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index74.1
Aromaticity0.084
Instability index19.9 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
WXG100PF06013.19 6.4e-074–78 Proteins of 100 residues with WXG

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 92.9, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)espG2 (- strand, 95 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)esxD (- strand, 35 bp gap)
Predicted operon esxC · esxD

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: esxC · esxD — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT4005) exponential phase: operon of 4, Rv3888c · Rv3889c · Rv3890c · Rv3891c (coverage 92.62)
stationary phase: operon of 2, Rv3890c · Rv3891c (coverage 64.05) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (4 TF) Rv0023 (activates) · Rv0324 (represses) · Rv3736 (activates) · espR (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: esxD (ESAT-6 like protein EsxD), high confidence (score 757, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 15 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3891c esxD ESAT-6 like protein EsxD 937 757 ctx neighborhood:743 textmining:751
Rv3889c espG2 ESX-2 secretion-associated protein EspG2 860 612 ctx neighborhood:549 textmining:655
Rv3894c eccC2 ESX-2 type VII secretion system protein EccC 528 512
Rv3892c PPE69 PPE family protein PPE69 464 464 ctx neighborhood:457
Rv3893c PE36 PE family protein PE36 493 457 ctx neighborhood:457
Rv3885c eccE2 ESX-2 secretion system protein EccE 424 424 ctx neighborhood:420
Rv3887c eccD2 ESX-2 secretion system protein EccD 781 420 ctx neighborhood:404 textmining:638
Rv3888c membrane protein 787 412 ctx neighborhood:403 textmining:652
Rv3886c mycP2 membrane-anchored mycosin 414 411 ctx neighborhood:404
Rv0287 esxG ESAT-6 like protein EsxG 620 399
Rv3020c esxS ESAT-6 like protein EsxS 701 392 textmining:529
Rv1783 eccC5 ESX-5 type VII secretion system protein EccC5 403 381
Rv2748c ftsK DNA translocase FtsK 492 349
Rv2002 fabG3 3-alpha(or 20-beta)-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 635 55 textmining:630
Rv1793 esxN ESAT-6 like protein EsxN 446 55 textmining:438

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: ESAT-6 like protein EsxC
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: WXG100 family type VII secretion target
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): WXG100 PF06013.19 (E=6e-07)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218407.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — WXG100 (PF06013.19)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG4842
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WNI1 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 92.9)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 15 functional partner(s); context anchor esxD
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_004124|Rv3890c|esxC
MSDQITYNPGAVSDFASDVGSRAGQLHMIYEDTASKTNALQEFFAGHGAQGFFDAQAQMLSGLQGLIETVGQHGTTTGHVLDNAIGTDQAIAGLF