PE36 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3893c · MTBC0 - · 77 aa · 4375762–4375995 H37Rv (-) · RefSeq YP_178025.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)PE family protein PE36
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)PE family protein PE36. Pfam: PE (PF00934.26).
Functional category (TubercuList)PE/PPE

Curation note: [La4, 2026-09-27] Deletion complete et specifique du sous-clade WILD (5/25 souches echantillonnees) de la lignee animale rare La4 (soeur de M. caprae, sans rapport avec la lignee humaine L4) : les 9 genes contigus Rv3885c-Rv3893c ont mean_coverage=0 chez les 5 souches wild contre >70x chez les 20 souches du clade primate de la meme lignee et chez les genes flanquants Rv3883c/Rv3894c (couverts normalement dans les deux clades) -- deletion locus-specifique, pas un artefact de sequencage. Le clade primate de La4 porte en revanche le frameshift esxC/Rv3890c partage avec Bovis/L6/L9/Microti/Orygis_La3/Pinnipedii/Suricattae deja documente ici (meme site NC_000962.3:4373846:TG:T, heritage partage de l'ancetre du clade animal, PAS une convergence supplementaire). Point methodologique pour l'atlas : cette deletion complete est INVISIBLE au suivi de perturbation par SPDI/frameshift (un gene absent ne produit aucun appel de variant, donc aucun drapeau de perturbation n'est leve), contrairement a un frameshift ou une substitution -- verifie par couverture directe (report.json.genes[].mean_coverage), pas par variant calling. Source : Guyeux, manuscrit La4 soumis a Infection, Genetics and Evolution (2026-09-27), preprint HAL hal-05765936v1, bundle de reproductibilite cguyeux/deciphering-tuberculosis-with-ai (La4/resultats/phase7/esx2_summary.md).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.

Named in the body of 20 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv3893c (3), PE36 (17).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “PE family protein PE36”: nothing found. no abstract in PubMed contains this protein name in a mycobacterial context: the silence measured under the locus tag is confirmed under the protein name.

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Full-text-only mention found (Europe PMC), not visible to the title/abstract sweep above.

This is a genome-wide computational study of PE/PPE protein interactions that would include PE36 among the analyzed PE paralogs, consistent with the assigned PE-family identity; the specific binding-partner predictions are computational and unvalidated (per the anti-oversell guardrail), so only the family identity is corroborated, not a specific interaction.

CORROBORATES existing atlas assignment (agent-reviewed, title+abstract tier, wave1/2 needs_read consolidation).

Lighter-weight than the dark-gene deep-dive protocol: title+abstract only, no full-text re-read performed here.

Europe PMC full-text sweep (P16.2a-septies, phase138, vagues 1/2), lot 'needs_read' (faible recoupement lexical, phase152), revu par agent general-purpose (titre+resume tbmonitor uniquement, protocole leger proportionne a un enrichissement de gene deja fonctionnel), consolide phase153 (2026-08-18).

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

1 record returned by the alias sweep — none names this gene

Searched as: Rv3893c, PE36, Mb3922c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

This count is not a count of papers about this gene. The alias sweep of 2026-09-07 returned 1 publication(s) for this gene, and NOT ONE of them names it in its title, abstract or author keywords: the match falls elsewhere in the PubMed record (a journal name, a DOI, an affiliation, an author name). A PubMed count is not an attribution. The count is kept visible rather than deleted, but it does not contradict the statement above that no publication mentions this gene, and it must not be read as evidence that the gene is studied.

PublicationJournalYear
Delivering drugs to the lungs: The history of repurposing in the treatment of respiratory diseases. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.04.010 does not name it Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2018

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered

Predicted disorder61% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 95.8
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 77 aa [0-77]

sequence-based disorder is high but AlphaFold folds it confidently (pLDDT>=70): treat the disorder call with caution (possible metapredict over-call)

The two disorder proxies disagree on this protein: metapredict calls 61% of residues disordered while the AlphaFold model is confident (mean pLDDT 95.8), on a sequence that is 43% alanine, glycine or proline.

The two disorder proxies on this page point in opposite directions, and both are kept. metapredict reads disorder from the sequence; the AlphaFold mean pLDDT reports model confidence, which is high here. Neither is wrong by construction: across the atlas the 55 genes in this situation are dominated by low-complexity sequence (38 of them are PE/PPE, 69 % against 4.0 % atlas-wide, hypergeometric p = 1.8e-42; median Ala+Gly+Pro fraction 0.55 against 0.28 elsewhere), where a compositionally biased region reads as disordered while AlphaFold models a regular repetitive segment with confidence. Read neither number as a settled statement about the protein's shape, and no function is inferred from either.

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.31 (95% CI -0.61 to 1.46). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.460 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3922c · 100.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_004009 · 100.0% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt L7N660 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt namePE family protein PE36

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
Preferred namePE36
eggNOG descriptionPE family
Orthologous group2AY4M

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 3 missense, 0 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.62% of strains (885) · clonal

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 2 consensus substitution(s) · 2 canettii-fixed disruption
low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable; carries 2 M. canettii-clade-fixed disruptive substitution(s) (candidate lineage-specific pseudogenisation — cross-check the intra-MTBC pseudogene layer)
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 4/53 (8%) · mean identity 91.9% · 2/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (4/53 NTM; in 2 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 5/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales)
domain-level detected through its Pfam domain PF00934, not as a full-length homolog
its Pfam domain PF00934 is detected by profile search (hmmsearch, gathering threshold) across the order Corynebacteriales but not in more distant Actinomycetia, while the full-length protein is not detected there by tblastn — a domain-level, not a gene-level, Corynebacteriales distribution

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RDcap_Spain7 100% Caprae (83%)

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 3 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 3 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 196.333333333. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 3 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatStatistically thin call: only 3 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.430.017 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.120.038 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 2 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length77 aa
Molecular weight7.4 kDa
Theoretical pI4.05
GRAVY0.497 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index82.9
Aromaticity0.052
Instability index30.7 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
PEPF00934.26 1.5e-054–72 PE family

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 95.8, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)PPE69 (- strand, 78 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)eccC2 (- strand, 266 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT4008) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv3893c · Rv3894c (coverage 22.04)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 24.19) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

PE/PPE family context (subfamily & T7SS secretion) PE ESX-2

Secretioncis-encoded within its own T7SS gene cluster (ESX-2)
Cognate PE/PPE partner(s) in this T7SS cluster PPE69
Literature framing no vaccine/antigen/diagnostic-framed paper found for this gene specifically

Subfamily: PE / PE_PGRS from the Mycobrowser gene name/product; PPE refined to PPE-MPTR / PPE-SVP / PPE-PPW when a dedicated Pfam domain is present (plain PPE otherwise) -- Ates 2020 defines this four-subfamily framework, and the PPE-MPTR mapping (Pfam "Pentapeptide_2") is corroborated gene-by-gene against the literature (PPE10, PPE13), not an invented rule. T7SS locus and secretion status derived from this atlas's own gene nomenclature (the eccA/B/C/D/E and mycP genes already named on the corresponding fiches), not a hard-coded coordinate table. Orphan PE/PPE genes are trans-secreted by ESX-5 (Abdallah et al. 2009). Part of P42 (2026-08-28/29).

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) Rv2250c (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: PPE69 (PPE family protein PPE69), high confidence (score 787, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 16 partners at medium confidence (4 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 16 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3892c PPE69 PPE family protein PPE69 833 787 ctx neighborhood:787
Rv3891c esxD ESAT-6 like protein EsxD 501 501 ctx neighborhood:501
Rv3890c esxC ESAT-6 like protein EsxC 493 457 ctx neighborhood:457
Rv3894c eccC2 ESX-2 type VII secretion system protein EccC 707 427 ctx neighborhood:427 textmining:511
Rv3895c eccB2 ESX-2 secretion system protein EccB 719 418 ctx neighborhood:418 textmining:537
Rv3896c hypothetical protein 417 417 ctx neighborhood:417
Rv1688 mpg 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase 803 41 textmining:803
Rv3539 PPE63 PPE family protein PPE63 630 41 textmining:630
Rv1430 PE16 PE family protein PE16 626 41 textmining:626
Rv0285 PE5 PE family protein PE5 543 41 textmining:543
Rv3872 PE35 PE family protein PE35 539 41 textmining:540
Rv0160c PE4 PE family protein PE4 517 41 textmining:517
Rv1800 PPE28 PPE family protein PPE28 513 41 textmining:513
Rv0152c PE2 PE family protein PE2 465 41 textmining:466
Rv2608 PPE42 PPE family protein PPE42 415 41 textmining:416

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): PE family protein PE36
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): PE PF00934.26 (E=2e-05)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_178025.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — PE (PF00934.26)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2AY4M
  • Curated reference: UniProt L7N660 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 95.8)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 16 functional partner(s); context anchor PPE69
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • PE/PPE family context: subfamily from Mycobrowser nomenclature; T7SS locus derived from this atlas's own eccA/B/C/D/E and mycP gene names; orphan trans-secretion by ESX-5 (Abdallah et al. 2009, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06783.x)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv3893c|PE36
MVWSVQPEAVLASAAAESAISAETEAAAAGAAPALLSTTPMGGDPDSAMFSAALNACGASYLGVVAEHASQRGLFAG