lipR Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3084 · MTBC0 mtbc0_003278 · 308 aa · 3471361–3472287 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_217600.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)acetyl-hydrolase LipR
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationalpha/beta hydrolase
Revised (this work)Alpha/beta hydrolase. Pfam: Say1_Mug180 (PF10340.16), Abhydrolase_3 (PF07859.20).
Functional category (TubercuList)intermediary metabolism and respiration

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 5 publications

5 TB publications mention this gene. 5 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 4 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
[Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Rv3084 Encodes Functional Esterase and Suppresses the Pro-inflammatory Cytokines in vivo]. 2019
Beijing clades of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are associated with differential survival in HIV-negative Russian patients. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2015.08.028 2015
Sequence Analysis of lip R: A Good Method for Molecular Epidemiology of Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1007/s00284-015-0856-0 2015
Does the lipR gene of tubercle bacilli have a role in tuberculosis transmission and pathogenesis? doi:10.1016/j.tube.2008.09.004 2009
The Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) lipAR operon encodes an extracellular lipase and a new type of transcriptional regulator. doi:10.1099/00221287-145-9-2365 1999
5 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv3084, lipR, Mb3111, MSMEG_3010 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
[Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Rv3084 Encodes Functional Esterase and Suppresses the Pro-inflammatory Cytokines in vivo]. names it Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2019
Beijing clades of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are associated with differential survival in HIV-negative Russian patients. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2015.08.028 Infect Genet Evol 2015
Sequence Analysis of lip R: A Good Method for Molecular Epidemiology of Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1007/s00284-015-0856-0 Curr Microbiol 2015
Does the lipR gene of tubercle bacilli have a role in tuberculosis transmission and pathogenesis? doi:10.1016/j.tube.2008.09.004 names it Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2009
The Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) lipAR operon encodes an extracellular lipase and a new type of transcriptional regulator. doi:10.1099/00221287-145-9-2365 Microbiology (Reading) 1999

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder18% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 94.8
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 46 aa [0-46]

carries a substantial disordered region (46/308 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourRv3085 (Rv3085, + strand)
Overlap4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): VirS (virS).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.91 (95% CI -0.63 to 3.68). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.207 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown; lipolytic enzyme involved in cellular metabolism.
Mycobrowser EC 3.1.1.- · agrees with the atlas

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3111 · 100.0% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_3010 · 31.6% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_003188 · 99.3% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WK85 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt namePutative acetyl-hydrolase LipR
EC (curated) EC 3.1.1.-
Curated functionRequired for maintaining the appropriate mycolic acid composition and permeability of the envelope on its exposure to acidic pH.

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Putative acetyl-hydrolase LipR; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category I Lipid transport and metabolism
Preferred namelipR
eggNOG descriptionalpha/beta hydrolase fold
Orthologous groupCOG0657
Gene Ontology (27) GO:0003674, GO:0003824, GO:0005575, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0008150, GO:0008152, GO:0009056, GO:0009268, GO:0009628, GO:0010447, GO:0016020 +15 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 1.867 · diversifying/relaxed
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 9 missense, 1 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 3 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.34% of strains (490) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Bovis, Caprae_La2, L2; union over all sites: 933 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:3450440:G:T · nonsense · 490 strains — fixed in 4 sub-clades of Bovis, totalling 489 strains — 3.7% of the 13 187 strains in the lineage named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.3.3 345/346, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.3.1 73/73, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.3.2 64/64, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.3 6/6)
  • NC_000962.3:3450181:A:AC · frameshift · 250 strains — fixed in 2 sub-clades of Caprae_La2, L2, totalling 55 strains — 0.1% of the 38 468 strains in the lineages named (largest: Caprae_La2.1.2.1 39/42, L2.1.2.2.3.1.3 13/13)
  • NC_000962.3:3450181:AC:A · frameshift · 193 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.187 (low power) · 6 consensus substitution(s)
low power (6 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 30/53 (57%) · mean identity 33.8% · 1/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 30/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 5/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 34.3%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
DS19 100% L4.8
219 100% L4.8

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 14 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 14 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 53.7857142857. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 14 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 9 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance21.3 ppm · rank 2304/3519 (34.6th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length308 aa
Molecular weight32.6 kDa
Theoretical pI9.68
GRAVY0.033 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index96.8
Aromaticity0.049
Instability index42.8 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Say1_Mug180PF10340.16 1.6e-1071–191 Steryl acetyl hydrolase
Abhydrolase_3PF07859.20 5.2e-4472–272 alpha/beta hydrolase fold

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 94.8, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 94.8

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
7atd-assembly2_B 1.00 0.91 0.88 0.91 33% 95% / 98% 1.3e-29 sig 7atd-assembly2_B Structure of inactive EstD11 S144A in complex with methyl-naproxen
7at3-assembly2_B 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.92 33% 95% / 98% 2.8e-29 sig 7at3-assembly2_B Structure of EstD11 in complex with Naproxen and methanol
7at4-assembly1_A 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.92 33% 95% / 98% 1.6e-28 sig 7at4-assembly1_A Structure of EstD11 in complex with Naproxen
7av5-assembly1_AAA 1.00 0.91 0.86 0.91 32% 95% / 98% 1.2e-28 sig 7av5-assembly1_AAA Structure of EstD11 in complex with Fluorescein
7auy-assembly1_A 1.00 0.94 0.85 0.94 33% 95% / 98% 2.2e-27 sig 7auy-assembly1_A Structure of EstD11 in complex with Fluorescein

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 94.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 7

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv3083 (+ strand, 5 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv3085 (+ strand, -4 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv3083 · lipR · Rv3085 · adhD · Rv3087 · tgs4 · fadD13

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 7: Rv3083 · lipR · Rv3085 · adhD · Rv3087 · tgs4 · fadD13 — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3169) exponential phase: operon of 7, Rv3083 · Rv3084 · Rv3085 · Rv3086 · Rv3087 · Rv3088 · Rv3089 (coverage 31.19)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (7 TF) Rv0023 (represses) · Rv0324 (activates) · Rv0494 (activates) · higA (activates) · virS (represses) · devR (activates) · Rv3736 (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: mymA (FAD-containing monooxygenase MymA), high confidence (score 984, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 46 partners at medium confidence (6 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 46 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3083 mymA FAD-containing monooxygenase MymA 994 984 ctx neighborhood:882 coexpression:869 textmining:660
Rv3085 sadH oxidoreductase SadH 997 983 ctx neighborhood:882 coexpression:860 textmining:870
Rv3086 adhD alcohol dehydrogenase D 991 960 ctx neighborhood:721 coexpression:862 textmining:803
Rv3089 fadD13 long chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase FadD13 988 953 ctx neighborhood:616 coexpression:866 textmining:759
Rv3088 tgs4 diacyglycerol O-acyltransferase 974 944 ctx neighborhood:616 coexpression:860 textmining:557
Rv3087 diacyglycerol O-acyltransferase 976 941 ctx neighborhood:590 coexpression:863 textmining:616
Rv3082c virS HTH-type transcriptional regulator VirS 611 611 ctx neighborhood:602
Rv0722 rpmD curated 50S ribosomal protein L30 492 493 database:490
Rv2903c lepB curated signal peptidase 501 482 database:464
Rv0310c exp (transferred) hypothetical protein 477 474 experimental:439
Rv3153 nuoI exp (transferred) NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit I 457 457 experimental:440
Rv3151 nuoG exp (transferred) NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit G 476 453 experimental:441
Rv3149 nuoE exp (transferred) NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit E 448 448 experimental:440
Rv3150 nuoF exp (transferred) NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit F 446 446 experimental:441
Rv2195 qcrA exp (transferred) ubiquinol-cytochrome C reductase rieske iron-sulfur subunit 439 433 experimental:426

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: acetyl-hydrolase LipR
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: alpha/beta hydrolase
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Say1_Mug180 PF10340.16 (E=2e-10), Abhydrolase_3 PF07859.20 (E=5e-44)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217600.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Say1_Mug180 (PF10340.16), Abhydrolase_3 (PF07859.20)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0657
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WK85 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 94.8)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 46 functional partner(s); context anchor mymA
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_003278|Rv3084|lipR
MNLRKNVIRSVLRGARPLFASRRLGIAGRRVLLATLTAGARAPKGTRFQRVSIAGVPVQRVQPPHAATSGTLIYLHGGAYALGSARGYRGLAAQLAAAAGMTALVPDYTRAPHAHYPVALEEMAAVYTRLLDDGLDPKTTVIAGDSAGGGLTLALAMALRDRGIQAPAALGLICPWADLAVDIEATRPALRDPLILPSMCTEWAPRYVGSSDPRLPGISPVYGDMSGLPPIVMQTAGDDPICVDADKIETACAASKTSIEHRRFAGMWHDFHLQVSLLPEARDAIADLGARLRGHLHQSQGQPRGVVK