Rv2516c Resolved · high
H37Rv Rv2516c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002679 ·
267 aa ·
2855600–2856403 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_217032.2
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | Three-domain architecture, resolved by domain-wise HHpred and physically justified by inter-domain PAE (not sequence guesswork alone): unit A (aa 1-87, ferredoxin-like fold, Pfam DUF8830/PF31169, restricted to actinomycetes), unit B (aa 88-147, winged helix-turn-helix of the AlpA / excisionase / recombination-directionality-factor family, Pfam PF05930/COG3311), a disordered linker (aa 148-177, median pLDDT 32), and unit C (aa 178-267, immunoglobulin-like beta-sandwich, no assignable family). Isolated on its own, unit B gives HHpred Probability 99.3%, E=1.3e-10 for the AlpA family (best template 8C3T, Wen et al. 2022 NAR) -- a >4500-fold gain in E-value over the same search run on the full-length protein (Probability 98.6-98.64%, E=4e-07/5.9e-7 across two independent HHpred runs) -- which resolves, in favour of DNA binding, the two earlier and mutually contradictory leads this fiche used to carry (a sub-threshold Pfam Sigma70_r4 hit plus a canonical HTH motif at the same residues, versus circular-permutant ribosomal-S6 Foldseek hits): the S6, Sigma70_r4 and Lrp/AsnC framings are now excluded. Unit B is also the single most conserved segment of the protein across the genus (83.8% identity over four independent NTM lineages, against 67.2% for unit C, 55.1% for unit A, 47.2% for the linker), consistent with it carrying the strongest functional constraint. ANTI-OVERCLAIM: this assigns a FOLD AND FAMILY, not a demonstrated activity -- no excisionase/antitermination activity, no operator, and no base-specific DNA contact have been shown for Rv2516c itself; the sequence specificity of any DNA binding remains open after an exhausted computational route (five converging but individually non-significant leads, and two independent Boltz-2 co-folding tests that failed as a DISCRIMINANT METHOD, not as a biological negative). Co-transcribed with Rv2517c in an ancient six-gene cassette (Rv2512c-Rv2517c) entirely deleted, not point-pseudogenized, in M. leprae. Induced by general antibiotic stress, not specifically by DNA damage or the DosR dormancy program (excluded genome-wide). Full dossier: companion project mtbc/Rv2516c/ (iteration 20). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
Curation note: 2026-07-30 (hand review, feedback from the dedicated deep-dive project mtbc/Rv2516c). The previous auto-generated summary surfaced only the ribosomal-S6 Foldseek hit, which seeded the dedicated project on a single weakly-supported RNA-binding lead; four independent layers of this same fiche point instead to DNA binding (see function). Verdict deliberately LEFT AT 'dark': converging weak leads orient the experimental plan, they do not assign a function. Operon context worth noting: Rv2516c overlaps Rv2517c by 4 bp, and Rv2517c is modestly up-regulated under moxifloxacin at 2x MIC, in an experiment where the SOS regulon showed NO significant change at that dose, and its authors call it a persistence gene rather than an SOS gene (Iacobino A, Piccaro G, Pardini M, Fattorini L, Giannoni F, 2021, Microorganisms 9(2):255, doi 10.3390/microorganisms9020255). An earlier version of this note read that paper's TITLE as if it described the gene, and the resulting 'DNA-damage-responsive regulator' hypothesis rested on that misreading (P18.17). It is further weakened by measurement: across GSE71200 (100 arrays, 9 antibiotics, 6 modes of action) the induction of Rv2516c and Rv2517c is NOT specific to DNA damage - recA separates the classes cleanly (percentile 97 under moxifloxacin, 5-35 elsewhere) whereas Rv2516c sits as high under kanamycin (93) and capreomycin (94) as under moxifloxacin (91), with r(recA, Rv2516c) = -0.04. Read the pair as responding to antibiotic stress in general, and the predicted HTH as an unassigned lead. Note also that Rv2517c is NON-essential (NE, VI +0.54, CI crossing zero) where Rv2516c is essential by CRISPRi (VI -9.91, `certain` flag set) — Tn-seq places the requirement on a sub-region only (ESD: 5 of its 14 TA sites essential, 9 not), so the contrast rests on the knockdown screen: an obligate heterodimer is therefore unlikely, and an AF-Multimer test of the pair needs a positive control to be interpretable. 2026-09-01 (P8.14, resync from the dedicated project mtbc/Rv2516c/, iteration 20, phase193_gene_atlas_resync_rv2516c.py). Verdict moved dark -> requalified, confidence low -> high: the sub-threshold Sigma70_r4/HTH lead this fiche carried since 2026-07-30 is now resolved, by domain-isolated HHpred (unit B, aa 88-147, Probability 99.28%, E=1.3e-10, >4500x stronger than the full-length search), to the AlpA/excisionase/recombination-directionality-factor family (PF05930/COG3311, Wen et al. 2022 NAR). The ribosomal-S6 Foldseek reading that originally seeded the dedicated project is REFUTED. This is a fold/family assignment, not a demonstrated activity: no excisionase or antitermination activity, no operator and no base-specific DNA contact are shown for Rv2516c itself; two independent Boltz-2 co-folding tests failed as a discriminant test of DNA-binding sequence specificity (method failure, not biological negative), and the question stays open pending an experimental assay (EMSA/footprinting), outside the scope of computation. Full dossier (three-unit architecture, PAE-justified domain independence, cross-genus conservation gradient, operon and M. leprae deletion evidence, DosR exclusion): mtbc/Rv2516c/etat_des_decouvertes.md.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). A full-text search does however find 1 paper(s) naming this gene in their body text — see the full-text lead field below (the gene is listed there only as an output of a computational regulatory-network model, with no experimental validation specific to it). The gene is therefore not unmentioned, and this page no longer claims that it is unstudied.
- Linking the transcriptional profiles and the physiological states of Mycobacterium tuberculosis during an extended intracellular infection. 2012 — PMID 22737072
Rv2516c is listed among 'transcriptional regulators' (alongside Rv2989) purely as an output of a computational Transcriptional Regulatory Network model built on macrophage-infection expression time-courses -- no experimental validation specific to Rv2516c in this paper (abstract itself does not name Rv2516c; the TRN-model gene list is the only source of the label). dark_dossier.py: NO Pfam domain at gathering threshold; the only structural lead is a sub-threshold HTH-superfamily convergence (Sigma70_r4 best hit, i-E=8.4e-4, 12 overlapping HTH-family models on the same window) -- already flagged in this atlas's own data as non-corroborating ('overlapping Pfam models of one superfamily are NOT independent evidence'), a finding that predates and is independent of this paper. Two individually insufficient signals (an unvalidated computational label + an already-discounted sub-threshold domain convergence) do not add up to proof when neither has been independently confirmed. phase140: neighbour Rv2515c (XRE family transcriptional regulator, Pfam HTH_3, already annotated) sits at edit-distance 1 -- checked specifically for a transposition, but the abstract available does not quote a locus tag for the TRN-model gene list, so neither confirms nor rules out a Rv2515c/Rv2516c mix-up in the source. Verdict left unchanged out of caution.
NOT requalified. An unvalidated network-model label, converging only with an already-discounted sub-threshold domain signal -- not independent corroboration.
Rv2516c already carries an extensive curation history (dedicated project mtbc/Rv2516c/, P18 audit) that repeatedly found and rejected several superficially plausible identities (ribosomal S6 Foldseek hit, DosR-regulation overclaim) -- this finding is consistent with that pattern, not an outlier.
Europe PMC full-text sweep (P16.2a-septies, phase138, wave 3, 2026-08-17/18) candidate, deep-dived 2026-08-18 against tbmonitor (title+abstract) and, where the abstract was insufficient, Europe PMC fullTextXML, plus phase140_locus_transposition_check.py.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv2517c (Rv2517c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Binding-pocket screen (P2Rank, geometric prediction) no confident pocket
| Pockets found | 2 (best probability 0.006) |
|---|---|
| Model length screened | 267 aa |
Read with care. This protein (267 aa) is above the size where the detector reliably differentiates proven enzymes (60.5% confident-pocket rate) from proteins annotated as non-catalytic (18.9%, i.e. 81.1% specificity; P16.3b calibration). Both rates are measured at the threshold this layer applies, best_probability >= 0.70, which is the best separation the detector reaches on that panel (Youden J = 0.416): even at its optimum it misses 39.5% of proven enzymes. 2 candidate pocket(s) were found but none reached confidence (best probability 0.006), which is consistent with a non-catalytic role, though it does not rule out a shallow or non-canonical binding site that this geometric detector misses. (Individual read at this confidence level; the GROUP-level dark-vs-non-catalytic contrast is NOT statistically significant at this size, p=0.285 -- read as modest evidence, not proof, cf. P16.3c.) P16.3e, calibration phase72b_pocket_calibration.py, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Rv0576 (Rv0576).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -9.91 (95% CI -11.01 to -8.79). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2545c
· 99.6% identity |
|---|---|
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002602
· 99.6% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
I6YDM0
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| Orthologous group | 2ENST |
|---|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 6 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.213 (low power)
· 5 consensus substitution(s) low power (5 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 6/53 (11%) · mean identity 59.1%
· 1/4 closest MTBAP relatives present in a subset of the genus (6/53 NTM; in 1 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) ESD — not strictly essential
These two screens are not in plain contradiction here, but they do not say the same thing either, and the difference matters for what may be written about this gene. Tn-seq (DeJesus 2017) places the requirement on a SUB-REGION of the ORF and explicitly declines to call the whole gene essential; CRISPRi (Bosch 2021) calls the gene essential under partial knockdown. Both point to an important gene; they disagree on the SCOPE of what is required. Locate the domain before concluding, and note that a stretch carrying no TA site is invisible to Himar1 Tn-seq — neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred there. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -9.912), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 26 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 27 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | ESD · essential domain |
|---|---|
| What the call means | essential domain: only a SUB-REGION of the ORF is essential; the gene as a whole is NOT essential. Locate the domain before concluding, and beware that a region devoid of TA sites is invisible to Himar1 TnSeq (neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred). |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
14 in the ORF —
5 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
9 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.357,
mean read count 51.6.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 14 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Domain attribution (P8.14, 2026-09-01, from mtbc/Rv2516c/ it.20): the 5 essential TA sites all fall within unit A (ferredoxin-like, aa 1-87) by count coincidence, not per-site proof; unit B, the HTH DNA-binding module now assigned by HHpred (aa 88-147), carries ZERO TA sites and is structurally invisible to Himar1 TnSeq -- neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred for it. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 19.6 ppm · rank 2352/3519 (33.2th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 267 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 29.4 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 5.53 |
| GRAVY | -0.191 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 84.1 |
| Aromaticity | 0.082 |
| Instability index | 42.5 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
Tentative domain (below the
--cut_ga gathering threshold; a
low-confidence homology lead, not a firm assignment): Sigma70_r4
(PF04545.23), i-Evalue 8.4e-04,
residues 98–121 —
Sigma-70, region 4.
Family undetermined, type recognised.
12 distinct Pfam families match the same window
(98–121):
HTH_10, HTH_11, HTH_17, HTH_20, HTH_23, HTH_24, HTH_AsnC-type, KORA, MarR_2, Rv2175c_wHTH, Sigma70_r4, Sigma70_r4_2.
12 distinct Pfam families overlap the same window (98-121) and 58% of them share the token 'HTH': the REGION and its general TYPE are recognised, the FAMILY is not. Read as 'a HTH-type domain, family undetermined', never as an assignment to the top-scoring family alone.
Overlapping Pfam models of one superfamily are NOT independent evidence: their convergence is partly mechanical. Weigh the window, not the count.
11 further sub-threshold hit(s) besides the best one above
| Pfam | accession | i-Evalue | residues | description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HTH_23 | PF13384.13 | 1.6e-03 | 85–120 | Homeodomain-like domain |
HTH_17 | PF12728.14 | 1.5e-02 | 97–145 | Helix-turn-helix domain |
HTH_11 | PF08279.19 | 2.4e-02 | 96–115 | HTH domain |
MarR_2 | PF12802.14 | 5.8e-02 | 95–117 | MarR family |
HTH_20 | PF12840.14 | 5.9e-02 | 92–114 | Helix-turn-helix domain |
Sigma70_r4_2 | PF08281.19 | 1.4e-01 | 98–117 | Sigma-70, region 4 |
HTH_AsnC-type | PF13404.13 | 3.1e-01 | 98–115 | AsnC-type helix-turn-helix domain |
Rv2175c_wHTH | PF21531.4 | 3.6e-01 | 96–117 | DNA-binding protein Rv2175c, wHTH domain |
HTH_10 | PF04967.19 | 4.1e-01 | 94–116 | HTH DNA binding domain |
HTH_24 | PF13412.13 | 5.9e-01 | 98–116 | Winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding |
KORA | PF16509.12 | 6.6e-01 | 99–117 | TrfB plasmid transcriptional repressor |
HHpred profile-profile:
top hits AlpA/excisionase family winged-HTH (PF05930/COG3311), unit B isolated (aa 88-147): Probability 99.28%, E=1.3e-10, best template 8C3T (Wen et al. 2022 NAR) -- mtbc/Rv2516c/, P2.1, >4500x stronger than the full-length search below, Same AlpA/excisionase family, full-length search (alignment window ~89-152): Probability 98.6%, E=4e-07 (this campaign, phase191_hhpred_campaign38_p813.py, 2026-09-01) and Probability 98.64%, E=5.9e-7 (independent earlier run, mtbc/Rv2516c/ P2.1) -- two separate HHpred web submissions converging on the same family, RdfS recombination-directionality factor, rank-2 hit on unit B, E=2.8e-10 (Ramsay et al. 2006 Mol Microbiol; Verdonk et al. 2022 Acta Cryst D) -- same wHTH superfamily, corroborating rather than a distinct alternative.
Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 80.9, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 86.2 (confident). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7b90-assembly1_E |
0.99 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 10% | 30% / 98% | 1.2e-01 | 7b90-assembly1_E Circular permutant of ribosomal protein S6, P54-55 truncated, I8A mutant |
7bff-assembly1_E |
0.99 | 0.65 | 0.23 | 0.65 | 10% | 28% / 96% | 1.4e-01 | 7bff-assembly1_E Circular permutant of ribosomal protein S6, P54-55 truncated, I25A mutant. |
7bfd-assembly1_K |
0.98 | 0.66 | 0.24 | 0.65 | 10% | 28% / 95% | 2.4e-01 | 7bfd-assembly1_K Circular permutant of ribosomal protein S6, P54-55 truncated, Y4A mutant. |
7lwr-assembly1_A |
0.97 | 0.73 | 0.18 | 0.73 | 18% | 20% / 98% | 4.9e-01 | 7lwr-assembly1_A Structural and Biochemical Insight into Assembly of Molecular Motors Involved in Viral DNA Packaging |
5d90-assembly2_C |
0.96 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 14% | 19% / 38% | 4.6e-01 | 5d90-assembly2_C Crystal structure of HiNmlR, a MerR family regulator lacking the sensor domain, bound to promoter DNA |
7bfe-assembly1_E |
0.95 | 0.66 | 0.24 | 0.66 | 10% | 28% / 96% | 4.6e-01 | 7bfe-assembly1_E Circular permutant of ribosomal protein S6, P54-55 truncated, L21A mutant. |
7lxs-assembly1_A |
0.94 | 0.71 | 0.18 | 0.70 | 17% | 20% / 98% | 6.4e-01 | 7lxs-assembly1_A Structural and Biochemical Insight into Assembly of Molecular Motors Involved in Viral DNA Packaging |
5d8c-assembly1_A |
0.94 | 0.71 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 14% | 19% / 40% | 6.4e-01 | 5d8c-assembly1_A Crystal structure of HiNmlR, a MerR family regulator lacking the sensor domain, bound to promoter DNA |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv2515c (- strand, 118 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2517c (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv2516c · Rv2517c
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
Rv2516c · Rv2517c
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2593) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv2516c · Rv2517c
(coverage 39.13)
stationary phase: operon of 3, Rv2516c · Rv2517c
(coverage 112.41)
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (5 TF) |
Rv0081 (activates) · Rv0324 (activates) · ramB (represses) · trcR (activates) · lsr2 (activates)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
GSE166501 (H37Rv, moxifloxacin 0.12x and 0.3x MIC vs untreated, 4/24/72 h, triplicates) · companion project mtbc/Rv2516c, P7.4, analyses/phase6_p7_4_geo_moxifloxacine.py. Caveat: One dataset, one institute, sub-inhibitory doses. It shows that the DosR framing is condition-dependent; it does not establish an alternative regulator.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2517c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 904, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
All 3 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2517c |
hypothetical protein | 904 | 904 ctx | neighborhood:882 |
Rv2515c |
hypothetical protein | 578 | 578 ctx | neighborhood:566 |
Rv2514c |
hypothetical protein | 514 | 515 ctx | neighborhood:513 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: hypothetical protein
- Foldseek best: 7b90-assembly1_E Circular permutant of ribosomal protein S6, P54-55 truncated, I (prob 0.99, E=1e-01, TM=0.64)
- (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)
- Hand review 2026-07-30: converging DNA-binding lead - sub-threshold Pfam Sigma70_r4 (PF04545, res. 98-121, i-E 8.4e-4) + canonical HTH motif at those exact positions + UniProt name 'Helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein'. Non-significant, but supported by three sequence/annotation layers plus structure.
- Hand review 2026-07-30: among the 8 Foldseek hits on the AlphaFold model, MerR-family regulators bound to promoter DNA (3hh0 TM 0.686, 5d8c TM 0.708, 5d90 TM 0.683) OUTSCORE by TM the ribosomal S6 permutants (TM 0.617-0.664) that the automatic summary reported as the single best hit. All non-significant.
- Hand review 2026-07-30: verdict deliberately left 'dark' - the convergence of weak leads orients the experimental plan (profile-profile HHpred, DNA-binding assay) and does not assign a function.
- Hand review 2026-07-30: protparam recomputed after fixing a x100 unit bug in the aliphatic index (phase20_protparam.py); this fiche now carries 84.1 instead of 8408.2.
- Hand review 2026-09-01 (P8.14 resync from mtbc/Rv2516c/, it.20): domain-isolated HHpred (unit B, aa 88-147) gives Probability 99.28%, E=1.3e-10 to the AlpA/excisionase winged-HTH family (PF05930/COG3311) -- >4500x stronger than the same search on the full-length protein (Probability 98.6-98.64%, E=4e-07/5.9e-7). Resolves the DNA-binding lead over the ribosomal-S6 reading; verdict moved dark -> requalified.
- Hand review 2026-09-01: unit B is the most genus-conserved segment of the protein (83.8% identity, 4 independent NTM lineages) and carries none of the gene's 5 essential TnSeq sites (all fall in unit A by count coincidence) -- essentiality of the DNA-binding module itself cannot be assessed by TnSeq (no TA site).
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217032.2)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2ENST - Curated reference: UniProt I6YDM0 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 86.2, confident)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 80.9)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
3 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv2517c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam SZ, et al. (2018). A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core Journal of Molecular Biology. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007
- Primary literature: Wen A, Zhao M, Jin S, Lu YQ, Feng Y (2022). Structural basis of AlpA-dependent transcription antitermination Nucleic Acids Research. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac608
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002679|Rv2516c| MTADWVVTFTFDADPSMETMDAWETQLEGFDALVSRVPGHGIDVTVYAPGDWSVFDALAKMAGEVMPVVQAKSPIAVQIISEPEHRLRAEAFTTPELMSAAEIADELGVSRQRVHQLRSTAGFPAPLADLRGGAVWDAAAVRRFAETWERKPGRPHTGTAKFAYSWAVGPAVGRSGKAPNVRWRVENPDKIRFVLRNIGDDIAEDVEIDLSRIDAITRNVPKKTVIRPGEGLNMVLIAAWGHPLPNQLYVRWAGQDEWAAVPLHPAH
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2516c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2516c