Rv1575 Resolved · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1575 · MTBC0 - · 166 aa · 1780199–1780699 H37Rv (+) · RefSeq NP_216091.2

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)phage protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)Phage protein.
Functional category (TubercuList)insertion seqs and phages

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.

Named in the body of 6 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv1575 (5), Mb1601 (1).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered

Predicted disorder92% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 50.6
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 166 aa [0-166]

carries a substantial disordered region (166/166 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) antiparallel · 11 % of gene

NeighbourRv1576c (Rv1576c, - strand)
Overlap57 bp, 11 % of this gene's length

antiparallel overlap: this gene may inherit essentiality/conservation signal from its neighbour through shared TA sites or promoter constraint, without any protein of its own being produced (cf. Rv2438A/nadE) Signals attributed to this gene (Tn-seq essentiality via shared TA sites, conservation via promoter constraint) should be cross-checked against the neighbour before being read as its own. P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): PyrR (pyrR).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1601 · 66.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt L0T9U5 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt nameProbable PhiRv1 phage protein

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 40.60% of strains (57893) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Bovis, Caprae_La2, L1, L3, L4, L5, L_1, La4; union over all sites: 63 370 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:1780585:C:CG · frameshift · 57 893 strains — fixed in 300 sub-clades of Bovis, Caprae_La2, L1, L3, L4, L5, L_1, La4, totalling 76 537 strains — 74.7% of the 102 455 strains in the lineages named (largest: L1 12367/21163, L3 7748/8744, L4.1 5507/8459, L4.8.2 2918/3769, L4.5.2 2988/3652, L4.4.1 2149/3139, …)
  • NC_000962.3:1780459:GC:G · frameshift · 5 477 strains — fixed in 59 sub-clades of Bovis, totalling 5 689 strains — 43.1% of the 13 187 strains in the lineage named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.2.9 1689/1763, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.3 472/480, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.3.3 337/346, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.1 234/244, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.7 193/212, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.7.2 176/191, …)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 0/53 (0%) · 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives
absent from ALL 53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes tested (incl. the closest MTBAP relatives) — a candidate MTBC-specific genetic innovation / host-adaptation factor (confirm by synteny; rule out a short/low-complexity ORF and extreme divergence)
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RD3 100% L2, L7, L4.12, L4.14, L6, L9, Microti, Orygis, Canettii (98%), L4.3 (92%), L4.7 (83%), L4.2 (62%), Caprae (58%), L10 n=2, not statistical, Chimpanze n=1, not statistical, Mungi n=1, not statistical, Dassie n=4, not statistical, Suricattae n=1, not statistical, L8 n=2, not statistical
149 100% L2, L7, L4.12, L4.14, L6, L9, Microti, Orygis, Canettii (98%), L4.3 (92%), L4.7 (83%), L4.2 (62%), Caprae (58%), L10 n=2, not statistical, Chimpanze n=1, not statistical, Mungi n=1, not statistical, Dassie n=4, not statistical, Suricattae n=1, not statistical, L8 n=2, not statistical
DS5 100% L2, L7, L4.12, L4.14, L6, L9, Microti, Orygis, Canettii (98%), L4.3 (92%), L4.7 (83%), L4.2 (62%), Caprae (58%), L10 n=2, not statistical, Chimpanze n=1, not statistical, Mungi n=1, not statistical, Dassie n=4, not statistical, Suricattae n=1, not statistical, L8 n=2, not statistical

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 10 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 5 growth-defect, 5 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.800, mean read count 20.25. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
7 of these 10 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 3 of this ORF's 10 TA sites lie inside Rv1574 (1 site), Rv1576c (2 sites), leaving 7 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 7 exclusive sites.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length166 aa
Molecular weight17.9 kDa
Theoretical pI11.54
GRAVY-0.745 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index66.6
Aromaticity0.042
Instability index59.7 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 50.6, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1574 (+ strand, -43 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv1576c (- strand, -57 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv1574 · Rv1575

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv1574 · Rv1575 — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1574 (phage protein), high confidence (score 807, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). This partner is also a paralogue of this gene (STRING homology score 934), so the association may reflect shared ancestry rather than a shared pathway.

All 15 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1574 paralog phage protein 807 807 ctx neighborhood:773
Rv1573 dark phage protein 467 467 ctx neighborhood:441
Rv3869 eccB1 ESX-1 secretion system protein EccB 523 68 textmining:510
Rv0823c dusB tRNA-dihydrouridine synthase 655 55 textmining:650
Rv2790c ltp1 lipid-transfer protein 807 54 textmining:805
Rv0458 aldehyde dehydrogenase 629 54 textmining:624
Rv3170 aofH flavin-containing monoamine oxidase 805 47 textmining:804
Rv0724 sppA protease IV SppA 804 47 textmining:803
Rv1758 cut1 cutinase 440 47 textmining:437
Rv0176 Mce associated transmembrane protein 652 46 textmining:651
Rv0120c fusA2 elongation factor G 654 44 textmining:653
Rv1132 hypothetical protein 808 41 textmining:808
Rv2561 Rv2561, (MTCY9C4.07c), len: 97 aa. Conserved hypothetical protein, highly similar in part (and longer 33 aa) to upstream ORF AAK46951|RV2562 807 41 textmining:807
Rv2542 hypothetical protein 806 41 textmining:806
Rv2216 epimerase family protein 549 41 textmining:549

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): phage protein
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216091.2)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Curated reference: UniProt L0T9U5 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 15 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1574
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv1575|
MEPKPSQRHTDKEVGAALGISAGTYKRLKRIDNATRSDDKEIRLFAEKQMAPLAAGSPSWNGRKPSSGNRKAATMAARLDILAWGPWAPSQNRSVVRRKQTLLSAQPSASPPAPTGGSNESTTQPAASWRVGGPAPLSRGRPRLALSYLRGSLHLQNSKRVAHQHI