Rv0691A Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv0691A · MTBC0 - ·
29 aa ·
791757–791846 H37Rv
(+) ·
RefSeq YP_007409348.2
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | mycofactocin precursor |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | — |
| Revised (this work) | Mycofactocin precursor. Pfam: MftA (PF23709.2). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | intermediary metabolism and respiration |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).
In the literature (TB corpus sweep)
The locus-tag sweep found nothing for Rv0691A, but 7 PubMed records name this protein under its usage name (mftA) in a mycobacterial context. S-Adenosylmethionine (SAM)-Dependent Methyltransferase MftM is Responsible for Methylation of the Redox Cofactor Mycofactocin (PMID 36288793); Biosynthesis of the redox cofactor mycofactocin is controlled by the transcriptional regulator MftR and induced by long-chain acyl-CoA species (PMID 34896395). That name comes from UniProt (UniProt gene name) and had never been searched: the earlier label was true of the tag and false of the protein. Being named in an abstract is not a function: what this gene does remains open, and each record must be read before anything is claimed from it.
This label was rewritten — what changed, and why
Label rewritten on 2026-09-10 (P46.2b volet (b)). It previously read "no publication mentions this gene", derived from a sweep that never searched the name under which this protein is cited (mftA). Only the label and this summary changed: no count, no paper and no verdict was touched.
What this page said before (2026-09-10, recovered from the record as it stood before this pass): « No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it. » The label it belonged to was rewritten by P46.2b (volet b). It is kept verbatim rather than deleted: it may carry curation this pass cannot reconstruct, and a reader is entitled to see what the page said before.
mftA).
7 records name this protein that way, in a
mycobacterial context, and were read one by one. The name comes from
UniProt gene name.
Checked 2026-09-10 against PubMed title, abstract and author keywords (efetch), not the whole record.
A term shared with another locus of this proteome is excluded before being searched, because a count on a shared name measures the neighbour: phase217 once reported 38 papers for Rv1433 that belonged to Rv2518c.
Rv0691A (3), MSMEG_1421 (1).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.
PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered
| Predicted disorder | 72% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 78.0 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 29 aa [0-29] |
sequence-based disorder is high but AlphaFold folds it confidently (pLDDT>=70): treat the disorder call with caution (possible metapredict over-call)
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 18 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv0692 (Rv0692, + strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 16 bp, 18 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Mycofactocin Synthesis Pathway.
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.50 (95% CI -0.58 to 2.14). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.344 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=4 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Electron carrier |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb0710A
· 98.4% identity |
|---|---|
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_1421
· 66.7% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_000729
· 100.0% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WJ81
SwissProt · reviewed
· Inferred from homology
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Mycofactocin precursor peptide |
| Curated function | Precursor peptide that leads to mycofactocin (MFT) after extensive post-translational modifications by enzymes encoded by adjacent genes. Mycofactocin acts as a redox cofactor of nicotinamide-dependent oxidoreductases encoded in the same locus. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| Orthologous group | 2B3XY |
|---|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 0/53 (0%)
· 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives absent from ALL 53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes tested (incl. the closest MTBAP relatives) — a candidate MTBC-specific genetic innovation / host-adaptation factor (confirm by synteny; rule out a short/low-complexity ORF and extreme divergence)
What this panel did not test:
M. smegmatis MSMEG_1421 (66.7 % identity).
This record is classified 'MTBC-specific' from a presence/absence scan over 53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes — a panel of slow growers and close relatives that contains neither M. smegmatis nor M. abscessus. The orthology layer of this same page names an ortholog in a species the panel never tested: M. smegmatis MSMEG_1421 (66.7 % identity). The two layers do not contradict each other; they interrogated different genomes. Read the classification as 'absent from that panel', not as 'absent from the genus'. |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 4/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) domain-level detected through its Pfam domain PF23709, not as a full-length homolog its Pfam domain PF23709 is detected by profile search (hmmsearch, gathering threshold) across the order Corynebacteriales but not in more distant Actinomycetia, while the full-length protein is not detected there by tblastn — a domain-level, not a gene-level, Corynebacteriales distribution |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
4 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
4 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 87.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
2 of these 4 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 1 of this ORF's 3 TA sites lies inside Rv0692 (1 site), leaving 2 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 2 exclusive sites — too few to carry a call on its own. |
| Caveat | Statistically thin call: only 4 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected
Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 29 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 3.3 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 4.05 |
| GRAVY | -0.138 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 80.3 |
| Aromaticity | 0.069 |
| Instability index | 15.7 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MftA | PF23709.2 | 5.3e-16 | 1–29 | Mycofactocin precursor peptide |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 78.0, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv0691c (- strand, 90 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv0692 (+ strand, -16 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv0691A · Rv0692 · Rv0693 · Rv0694
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0719.1) |
exponential phase: operon of 7,
Rv0691A · Rv0692 · Rv0693 · Rv0694 · Rv0695 · Rv0696 · Rv0697
(coverage 69.05)
stationary phase: operon of 5, Rv0691A · Rv0692 · Rv0693 · Rv0694 · Rv0695
(coverage 52.62)
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: mftB (mycofactocin system protein MftB), high confidence (score 882, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
All 9 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0692 mftB |
mycofactocin system protein MftB | 984 | 882 ctx | neighborhood:882 textmining:870 |
Rv0694 mftD |
mycofactocin system heme/flavin oxidoreductase MftD | 976 | 882 ctx | neighborhood:882 textmining:810 |
Rv0693 mftC |
mycofactocin radical SAM maturase MftC | 957 | 882 ctx | neighborhood:882 textmining:655 |
Rv0691c mftR |
mycofactocin biosynthesis transcriptional regulator MftR | 573 | 573 ctx | neighborhood:573 |
Rv0690c |
hypothetical protein | 573 | 573 ctx | neighborhood:573 |
Rv0695 mftE |
mycofactocin system creatinine amidohydrolase family protein MftE | 934 | 514 ctx | neighborhood:514 textmining:870 |
Rv0696 mftF |
mycofactocin biosynthesis glycosyltransferase MftF | 925 | 448 ctx | neighborhood:448 textmining:870 |
Rv0697 mftG |
dehydrogenase | 423 | 423 ctx | neighborhood:423 |
Rv1872c lldD2 |
L-lactate dehydrogenase | 497 | 72 | textmining:481 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): mycofactocin precursor
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): MftA PF23709.2 (E=5e-16)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_007409348.2)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — MftA (PF23709.2)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2B3XY - Curated reference: UniProt P9WJ81 (SwissProt, reviewed; Inferred from homology)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
9 functional partner(s); context anchor
mftB - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>H37Rv|Rv0691A| MDYETDTDTELVTETLVEEVSIDGMCGVY
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv0691A? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv0691A