Rv0123 Family assigned · low
H37Rv Rv0123 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000134 ·
122 aa ·
149022–149390 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_214637.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | DNA-binding protein |
| Revised (this work) | Putative DNA-binding protein. No Pfam domain above threshold, but Foldseek matches antitoxin DNA-binding domains strongly and consistently (CopASO antitoxin prob 0.99 / TM 0.83; ParDE antitoxin; PutA HTH), pointing to a ribbon-helix-helix / antitoxin-type DNA-binding fold. Structure-based, consistent with the PGAP 'DNA-binding protein' call. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.
Rv0123 (1).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered
| Predicted disorder | 90% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 82.2 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 122 aa [0-122] |
sequence-based disorder is high but AlphaFold folds it confidently (pLDDT>=70): treat the disorder call with caution (possible metapredict over-call)
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 4.9
required for fitness in vivo (virulence / persistence factor).
| Corroborating evidence | conserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; STRING-coupled to PE_PGRS2 (PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS2); structural lead available |
|---|
This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv0122 (Rv0122, + strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 1 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -13.48 (95% CI -22.98 to -3.74). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.531 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=5 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb0128
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_000134
· 100.0% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O07173
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Uncharacterized protein |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| Orthologous group | 28Z1X |
|---|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 5/53 (9%) · mean identity 62.5%
· 2/4 closest MTBAP relatives present in a subset of the genus (5/53 NTM; in 2 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is one its own authors flag as NOT certain (vulnerability index -13.477), so it is the weaker of the two calls. Do not treat the CRISPRi essentiality as settled here. Atlas-wide, 104 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
9 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
9 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.556,
mean read count 64.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 9 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Read with some caution: only 9 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 9 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) | -1.92 | 0.039 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 152.0 ppm · rank 1012/3519 (71.3th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 122 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 13.6 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 9.0 |
| GRAVY | -0.615 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 88.6 |
| Aromaticity | 0.025 |
| Instability index | 44.8 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
Tentative domain, to be read as weaker than its
E-value (see the heterogeneous convergence below) (below the
--cut_ga gathering threshold; a
low-confidence homology lead, not a firm assignment): RHH_1
(PF01402.28), i-Evalue 5.4e-03,
residues 76–114 —
Ribbon-helix-helix protein, copG family.
Heterogeneous convergence — downgrade the hit above.
3 distinct Pfam families match the same window
(76–114):
NikA-like, RHH_1, Ribosomal_S18.
3 HETEROGENEOUS Pfam families overlap the same window (76-114) with no dominant type: typical of a low-complexity or coiled-coil stretch that matches many unrelated models. Treat the top hit as WEAKER than its i-Evalue suggests, not stronger.
Overlapping Pfam models of one superfamily are NOT independent evidence: their convergence is partly mechanical. Weigh the window, not the count.
2 further sub-threshold hit(s) besides the best one above
| Pfam | accession | i-Evalue | residues | description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NikA-like | PF21983.3 | 1.6e-01 | 76–104 | Mobilization protein NikA |
Ribosomal_S18 | PF01084.27 | 4.7e-01 | 106–122 | Ribosomal protein S18 |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 82.2, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 57.6 (low). Low-confidence model: the fold may be unreliable, so treat these structural hits with caution.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6iya-assembly2_C |
0.99 | 0.83 | 0.34 | 0.83 | 31% | 37% / 100% | 1.6e-01 | 6iya-assembly2_C Structure of the DNA binding domain of antitoxin CopASO |
6xrw-assembly1_B-2 |
0.96 | 0.80 | 0.35 | 0.52 | 29% | 39% / 61% | 3.7e-01 | 6xrw-assembly1_B-2 Chromosomal ParDE TA system from P. aeruginosa |
3ft7-assembly1_A |
0.94 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 0.78 | 18% | 36% / 98% | 4.3e-01 | 3ft7-assembly1_A Crystal structure of an extremely stable dimeric protein from sulfolobus islandicus |
2gpe-assembly1_A |
0.72 | 0.77 | 0.34 | 0.76 | 13% | 38% / 98% | 1.5e+00 | 2gpe-assembly1_A Structure of the DNA-binding domain of E. Coli Proline Utilization A (PUTA) |
8ypj-assembly1_A |
0.66 | 0.66 | 0.31 | 0.65 | 20% | 40% / 98% | 1.0e+00 | 8ypj-assembly1_A Cyrstal structure of the MazE-mt10 Antitoxin from Mycobacterium tuberculosis |
2k5j-assembly1_B |
0.57 | 0.65 | 0.35 | 0.50 | 25% | 46% / 71% | 7.4e-01 | 2k5j-assembly1_B Solution structure of protein yiiF from Shigella flexneri serotype 5b (strain 8401) . Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium target sft1 |
8u12-assembly1_A |
0.51 | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 20% | 41% / 100% | 1.7e+00 | 8u12-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of Antitoxin Protein Rv0298 of Type II Toxin-antitoxin Systems from Mycobacterium tuberculosis |
6sbw-assembly1_A |
0.35 | 0.72 | 0.32 | 0.70 | 11% | 38% / 98% | 3.6e+00 | 6sbw-assembly1_A CdbA Form One |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv0122 (+ strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | PE_PGRS2 (+ strand, 308 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv0122 · Rv0123
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
Rv0122 · Rv0123
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0131) |
expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 33.66)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 32.8) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0122 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 887, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
All 3 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0122 |
hypothetical protein | 887 | 887 ctx | neighborhood:882 |
Rv0121c |
hypothetical protein | 533 | 533 ctx | neighborhood:532 |
Rv0124 PE_PGRS2 |
PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS2 | 406 | 405 ctx | neighborhood:405 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- MTBC0 PGAP product: 'DNA-binding protein'
- Pfam: no domain above threshold
- Foldseek on the ESMFold model: consistent hits to antitoxin DNA-binding domains (6IYA CopASO prob 0.99 TM 0.83; ParDE; PutA HTH) -- a DNA-binding fold
ESM Atlas signal (exploratory)
Ancestral protein hash 6d93c8d3df3504116923c5bb3be78ee0 ·
10 ESM-space neighbours (max similarity 0.956).
SAE features are orienting indices, not validated domains.
| # | Index | Activation | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8116 |
1.42 | Terminal disorder and cap motifs |
| 2 | 14869 |
1.11 | N-terminal basic DNA-binding patch |
| 3 | 6413 |
0.93 | Basic amphipathic interface patches |
| 4 | 952 |
0.91 | Basic phosphate-binding DNA/RNA/CoA patches |
| 5 | 13077 |
0.89 | Short basic amphipathic recognition helices |
| 6 | 9286 |
0.89 | Short amphipathic alpha-helix motif |
| 7 | 5762 |
0.84 | Charged low-complexity terminal/linker IDRs |
| 8 | 9860 |
0.76 | Amphipathic helix N-cap motifs |
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214637.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
28Z1X - Curated reference: UniProt O07173 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 57.6, low)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 82.2)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
3 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv0122 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_000134|Rv0123| MTKKPRNPADYVIGDDVEVSDVDLKQEEVYVDGERLTDERVEQMASESLRLAREREANLIPGGKSLSGGSAHSPAVQVVVSKATHAKLKELARSRKMSVSKLLRPVLDEFVQRETGRILPRR
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv0123? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv0123