ltp4 Family assigned · low auto-curated
H37Rv Rv3522 · MTBC0 mtbc0_003738 ·
354 aa ·
3982125–3983189 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_218039.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | lipid transfer protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | thiolase domain-containing protein |
| Revised (this work) | Thiolase domain-containing protein. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | lipid metabolism |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named in the literature
The older source behind the earlier label reported no publication, but the alias sweep of this same layer lists 1 publication(s) whose title, abstract or author keywords actually name this gene as « ltp4 », in a text that also names a mycobacterium (PMID 23474435 (J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 2013)). Read the earlier silence as a property of the QUERY, not of the protein. The 1 publication(s) returned by the sweep were re-read one by one against the indexed text: matches falling in a journal name, a DOI, an affiliation or an author name were discarded, and so were those where the same name belongs to another organism. Naming is not attribution: a name shared with a paralogue or with the ortholog of another mycobacterial species can still mislead, so the papers are listed for the reader to judge rather than folded into a functional claim.
This label was rewritten — what changed, and why
Label rewritten on 2026-09-10 (P46.2b, volet a). It previously read "no publication mentions this gene", derived from the locus-tag sweep alone while this same layer already listed publications that name the gene. Only the label and this summary changed: no count, no paper and no verdict was touched.
What this page said before (2026-09-10, recovered from the last commit, this script having overwritten it earlier the same day before it kept the previous text): « No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it. » The label it belonged to was rewritten by P46.2b (volet a). It is kept verbatim rather than deleted: it may carry curation this pass cannot reconstruct, and a reader is entitled to see what the page said before.
Rv3522 (2), ltp4 (16), MSMEG_5922 (1).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.
PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.
1 of the 1 record returned by the alias sweep names this gene
Searched as: Rv3522, ltp4, Mb3552, MMAR_5007, MSMEG_5922, MAB_4168
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Each record below was re-read on 2026-09-10 against PubMed title, abstract and author keywords (efetch), not the whole record: 1 names this gene, 0 carry the same name outside any mycobacterial context, 0 match elsewhere in the PubMed record (journal name, DOI, affiliation, author name).
This count disagrees with the 0 reported above. The two come from different methods and both are shown rather than one being silently overwritten. The figure above comes from the older curated source, which missed this gene; the sweep below queries every alias of the gene in a mycobacterial context, and each record it returned was then re-read against PubMed title, abstract and author keywords (efetch), not the whole record. Where they differ this way, the list below is the one you can check line by line.
| Publication | Journal | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative analysis of genes encoding key steroid core oxidation enzymes in fast-growing Mycobacterium spp. strains. doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.02.016 names it | J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol | 2013 |
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.97 (95% CI -0.71 to 3.59). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.270 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Function unknown; probably involved in lipid metabolism. |
|---|---|
| Mycobrowser EC |
2.3.1.16
|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb3552
· 99.7% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_5007
· 84.9% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_5922
· 81.5% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_003627
· 99.7% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_4168
· 77.4% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O53567
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Possible lipid transfer protein or keto acyl-CoA thiolase Ltp4 |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
I Lipid transport and metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | ltp4 |
| eggNOG description | lipid-transfer protein |
| Orthologous group | COG0183 |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.352 · purifying |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 5 synonymous, 5 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.076
· 17 consensus substitution(s) under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.076) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 51/53 (96%) · mean identity 86.0%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 51/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 5/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 69.6% detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
19 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
19 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 88.3684210526.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 19 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 19.7 ppm · rank 2349/3519 (33.3th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 354 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 37.9 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 5.94 |
| GRAVY | -0.024 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 88.9 |
| Aromaticity | 0.071 |
| Instability index | 37.9 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 95.8, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 95.8
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4yzo-assembly2_D |
1.00 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 21% | 98% / 100% | 4.7e-20 sig | 4yzo-assembly2_D Crystal Structure Analysis of Thiolase-like protein, ST0096 from Sulfolobus Tokodaii |
7pyt-assembly1_B |
1.00 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 17% | 99% / 99% | 2.2e-20 sig | 7pyt-assembly1_B Benzoylsuccinyl-CoA thiolase with coenzyme A |
6hsp-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 19% | 99% / 99% | 1.6e-20 sig | 6hsp-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the zebrafish peroxisomal SCP2-thiolase (type-1) in complex with CoA and octanoyl-CoA |
6hrv-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 19% | 99% / 99% | 1.4e-19 sig | 6hrv-assembly2_B Crystal structure of the zebrafish peroxisomal SCP2-thiolase (type-1) |
8gqf-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 16% | 100% / 100% | 6.4e-20 sig | 8gqf-assembly1_A Crystal structure of Thiolase |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 95.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv3521 (+ strand, 15 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | ltp3 (+ strand, 16 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv3521 · ltp4 · ltp3 · Rv3524
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3622.1) |
not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase) |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
kstR (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv3521 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 989, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 150 partners at medium confidence (56 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 150 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv3521 exp (transferred) |
hypothetical protein | 996 | 989 ctx | neighborhood:863 cooccurence:774 coexpression:453 experimental:415 textmining:705 |
Rv0860 fadB exp (transferred) curated |
fatty oxidation protein FadB | 967 | 966 | coexpression:697 experimental:804 database:447 |
Rv3542c chsH2 exp (transferred) |
hypothetical protein | 940 | 920 ctx | cooccurence:770 coexpression:438 experimental:415 |
Rv3523 ltp3 paralog |
lipid carrier protein | 966 | 917 ctx | neighborhood:861 textmining:618 |
Rv3550 echA20 curated |
enoyl-CoA hydratase EchA20 | 928 | 909 ctx | cooccurence:649 database:447 |
Rv3541c chsH1 |
hypothetical protein | 885 | 860 ctx | cooccurence:773 |
Rv3504 fadE26 |
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE26 | 894 | 843 ctx | cooccurence:733 |
Rv3516 echA19 curated |
enoyl-CoA hydratase EchA19 | 970 | 840 | database:447 textmining:826 |
Rv3543c fadE29 |
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE29 | 968 | 838 ctx | cooccurence:721 textmining:815 |
Rv3573c fadE34 |
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE34 | 901 | 826 ctx | cooccurence:704 textmining:456 |
Rv3552 |
CoA-transferase subunit beta | 824 | 816 ctx | cooccurence:761 |
Rv3520c |
coenzyme F420-dependent oxidoreductase | 943 | 815 ctx | neighborhood:760 textmining:705 |
Rv3551 |
CoA-transferase subunit alpha | 815 | 807 ctx | cooccurence:755 |
Rv3562 fadE31 |
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE31 | 834 | 802 ctx | cooccurence:664 |
Rv3544c fadE28 |
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE28 | 897 | 789 ctx | cooccurence:642 textmining:535 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: lipid transfer protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: thiolase domain-containing protein
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218039.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG0183 - Curated reference: UniProt O53567 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 95.8)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
150 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv3521 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_003738|Rv3522|ltp4 MSVRDIAVVGFAHAPHVRRTDGTTNGVEMLMPCFAQLYDELGITKADIGFWCSGSSDYLAGRAFSFISAIDSIGAVPPINESHVEMDAAWALYEAYIKLLTGEVDTALVYGFGKSSAGTLRRVLSRQTDPYTVAPLWPDSVSMAGLQARLGLDSGKWTHEQMARVAFDSFTNARRVDSVEPPITVGELLARPFFADPLRRHDIAPITDGAAAVVLAADNRARELRENPAWITGIEHRIESPALGARDITESPSTKLAAKIATGGHTGDIDVAEIHGPFTHQHLIVAEAIRIPGKTKVNPSGGPLAANPMFAAGLERIGFAAQHIWDGSARRVLAHATSGPALQQNLVAVMEGRG
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for ltp4? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about ltp4