Rv2808 Resolved · medium
H37Rv Rv2808 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002988 ·
85 aa ·
3137461–3137718 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_217324.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | Belongs to the SdhE/Sdh5/YgfY family (Pfam DUF5669 89.6% full-length, plus strongly converging YgfY-like / SdhE / Sdh5 hits at 83-88%): the FAD-assembly / flavinylation-factor fold of succinate dehydrogenase. The same fold is also used by CptB-type toxin-antitoxin antitoxins. Genomic context is ambiguous (singleton, not adjacent to sdh genes nor to a toxin; flanked by an integrase-domain hypothetical Rv2807 and Rv2809), so the family/fold is confidently assigned but the specific role (SDH flavinylation vs CptB-like antitoxin) is undetermined. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.
Rv2808 (10).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Lsr2 (lsr2).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 1.06 (95% CI 0.01 to 2.91). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.399 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2831
· 98.8% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_0481
· 63.5% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002896
· 98.8% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P71643
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Predicted
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Uncharacterized protein |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| Orthologous group | 291GV |
|---|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.0 · quasi-invariant (2 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 2 synonymous, 0 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 15/53 (28%) · mean identity 70.5%
· 1/4 closest MTBAP relatives present in a subset of the genus (15/53 NTM; in 1 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria short ORF (85 aa) a shallow stratum may reflect homology-detection failure, not true youth present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)
| RD | Gene overlap | Deleted in lineages |
|---|---|---|
RDsurDR |
100% | Suricattae n=1, not statistical |
This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
10 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
10 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.900,
mean read count 74.8888888889.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 10 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 5 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 14.7 ppm · rank 2500/3519 (29.0th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 85 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 9.9 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 4.43 |
| GRAVY | -0.589 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 88.4 |
| Aromaticity | 0.082 |
| Instability index | 51.8 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
HHpred profile-profile:
top hits PF18918 DUF5669 (89.6%, E=6.7, full-length), SdhE FAD assembly factor / YgfY fold (86-88%), PF03937 Sdh5 flavinator (83%).
Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 96.4, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 90.8 (very high). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6fnd-assembly1_B |
0.16 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.11 | 13% | 82% / 14% | 4.4e+00 | 6fnd-assembly1_B Crystal structure of Toxoplasma gondii AKMT |
5mq1-assembly1_A |
0.10 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 8% | 85% / 66% | 4.0e+00 | 5mq1-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the BRD7 bromodomain in complex with BI-9564 |
4hwd-assembly3_B |
0.09 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 18% | 79% / 79% | 4.4e+00 | 4hwd-assembly3_B Crystal structure of ATBAG2 |
8y3y-assembly1_D |
0.09 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 11% | 72% / 6% | 4.7e+00 | 8y3y-assembly1_D The Cryo-EM structure of anti-phage defense associated DSR2 tetramer bound with two DSAD1 inhibitors (opposite side) |
1xg2-assembly1_B |
0.08 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 14% | 87% / 44% | 6.2e+00 | 1xg2-assembly1_B Crystal structure of the complex between pectin methylesterase and its inhibitor protein |
3kav-assembly1_A |
0.07 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 10% | 85% / 70% | 6.6e+00 | 3kav-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of THE MUTANT (L80M) PA2107 PROTEIN from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium Target PaR198 |
8y3m-assembly1_B |
0.07 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 14% | 60% / 5% | 9.2e+00 | 8y3m-assembly1_B Cryo-EM structure of DSR2-DSAD1 complex (cross-linked) |
8zak-assembly1_A |
0.06 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 18% | 94% / 36% | 3.5e+00 | 8zak-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the channel protein CorA from Campylobacter jejuni in complex with Ni2+ |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv2807 (+ strand, 233 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2809 (+ strand, 104 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2875) |
exponential phase: operon of 2,
Rv2808 · Rv2809
(coverage 66.92)
stationary phase: operon of 2, Rv2808 · Rv2809
(coverage 26.27)
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
Rv0081 (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2809 (hypothetical protein), medium confidence (score 576, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
All 9 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2809 |
hypothetical protein | 576 | 576 ctx | neighborhood:561 |
Rv2807 |
hypothetical protein | 428 | 428 ctx | neighborhood:428 |
Rv3766 |
hypothetical protein | 660 | 47 | textmining:658 |
Rv2004c |
hypothetical protein | 441 | 47 | textmining:438 |
Rv2003c |
hypothetical protein | 545 | 46 | textmining:543 |
Rv3459c rpsK |
30S ribosomal protein S11 | 433 | 46 | textmining:431 |
Rv2283 dark |
hypothetical protein | 804 | 41 | textmining:804 |
Rv2402 |
trehalase | 547 | 41 | textmining:547 |
Rv3128c |
Rv3128c, (MTCY164.38c), len: 337 aa. Conserved hypothetical protein, similar to other conserved hypothetical proteins. This ORF corresponds | 426 | 41 | textmining:427 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: hypothetical protein
- Foldseek best: 6fnd-assembly1_B Crystal structure of Toxoplasma gondii AKMT (prob 0.16, E=4e+00, TM=0.54)
- (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217324.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
291GV - Curated reference: UniProt P71643 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 90.8, very high)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 96.4)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
9 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv2809 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam SZ, et al. (2018). A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core Journal of Molecular Biology. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002988|Rv2808| MSNVLDAISTEHRPVIEQELENRNPALFDELRRTEKPTNEQSDAVIDVLSDALMKTFGPDWVPNDYGLKIERAIDAYLETWPIYR
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2808? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2808