sufR Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1460 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001562 · 268 aa · 1655991–1656797 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_215976.2

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transcriptional regulator
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationsuf operon transcriptional regulator SufR
Revised (this work)Suf operon transcriptional regulator SufR. Pfam: HTH_20 (PF12840.14), HTH_24 (PF13412.13), HTH_5 (PF01022.27), HTH_11 (PF08279.19).
Functional category (TubercuList)regulatory proteins

Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 13 publications

13 TB publications mention this gene. 13 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 13 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 1 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 1-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 13: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
An Aerobic in Vitro Cell Lysate-based Method for Fe-S Cluster Reconstitution in Recombinant Rv1460 Protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. doi:10.1007/s12010-026-05769-9 2026
A New Paradigm of Transcriptional Regulation by the SufR-Like Iron-Sulfur Transcription Factors. doi:10.64898/2025.12.26.696629 2025
Cysteine desulfurase (IscS)-mediated fine-tuning of bioenergetics and SUF expression prevents Mycobacterium tuberculosis hypervirulence. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh2858 2023
Investigating Mycobacterium tuberculosis sufR (rv1460) in vitro and ex vivo expression and immunogenicity. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286965 2023
The impact of genotype on the phenotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ΔsufR mutants. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2023.102360 2023
13 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv1460, sufR, Mb1495, ML0592, MMAR_2265, MSMEG_3121, MAB_2750c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
An Aerobic in Vitro Cell Lysate-based Method for Fe-S Cluster Reconstitution in Recombinant Rv1460 Protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. doi:10.1007/s12010-026-05769-9 names it Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2026
A New Paradigm of Transcriptional Regulation by the SufR-Like Iron-Sulfur Transcription Factors. doi:10.64898/2025.12.26.696629 names it bioRxiv 2025
Cysteine desulfurase (IscS)-mediated fine-tuning of bioenergetics and SUF expression prevents Mycobacterium tuberculosis hypervirulence. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh2858 Sci Adv 2023
Investigating Mycobacterium tuberculosis sufR (rv1460) in vitro and ex vivo expression and immunogenicity. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286965 names it PLoS One 2023
The impact of genotype on the phenotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ΔsufR mutants. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2023.102360 names it Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2023
Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires SufT for Fe-S cluster maturation, metabolism, and survival in vivo. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1010475 PLoS Pathog 2022
Host and Bacterial Iron Homeostasis, an Underexplored Area in Tuberculosis Biomarker Research. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.742059 Front Immunol 2021
Mycobacterium tuberculosis SufR responds to nitric oxide via its 4Fe-4S cluster and regulates Fe-S cluster biogenesis for persistence in mice. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2021.102062 names it Redox Biol 2021
Correction: Rv1460, a SufR homologue, is a repressor of the suf operon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208568 names it PLoS One 2018
Iron homeostasis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is essential for persistence. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35012-3 Sci Rep 2018
Rv1460, a SufR homologue, is a repressor of the suf operon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200145 names it PLoS One 2018
Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes preferentially expressed during human infection. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2010.10.003 Microb Pathog 2011
Upregulation of stress response genes and ABC transporters in anaerobic stationary-phase Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1007/s004380051130 Mol Gen Genet 1999

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighboursufB (Rv1461, + strand)
Overlap4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -3.92 (95% CI -13.89 to 6.61). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.343 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionInvolved in transcriptional mechanism

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1495 · 99.3% identity
M. leprae ML0592 · 81.3% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2265 · 83.1% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_3121 · 69.6% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001542 · 99.3% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2750c · 73.5% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O53151 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameProbable transcriptional regulatory protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category K Transcription
Preferred namesufR
eggNOG descriptionregulatory protein
Orthologous groupCOG2345

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.945 · quasi-invariant (7 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 4 missense, 1 nonsense, 0 frameshift
Disruption 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.14% of strains (195) · clonal

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 2 consensus substitution(s)
low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 81.1% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 10/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 51.4%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 9 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 9 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.778, mean read count 31.8571428571. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 9 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatRead with some caution: only 9 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 9 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 9 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance4.11 ppm · rank 3004/3519 (14.7th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length268 aa
Molecular weight28.2 kDa
Theoretical pI6.26
GRAVY-0.17 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index85.0
Aromaticity0.026
Instability index50.6 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
HTH_20PF12840.14 8.5e-0943–84 Helix-turn-helix domain
HTH_24PF13412.13 1.8e-0843–84 Winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding
HTH_5PF01022.27 2.2e-0643–84 Bacterial regulatory protein, arsR family
HTH_11PF08279.19 2.4e-0644–84 HTH domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 83.0, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 83.0

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
3e6m-assembly2_D 1.00 0.82 0.24 0.42 23% 28% / 46% 3.9e-03 sig 3e6m-assembly2_D The crystal structure of a MarR family transcriptional regulator from Silicibacter pomeroyi DSS.
4kmf-assembly1_A-2 1.00 0.85 0.21 0.85 23% 26% / 95% 5.1e-03 sig 4kmf-assembly1_A-2 Crystal structure of Zalpha domain from Carassius auratus PKZ in complex with Z-DNA
5yi0-assembly1_B 1.00 0.82 0.23 0.41 27% 26% / 44% 6.7e-03 sig 5yi0-assembly1_B Structure of Lactococcus lactis ZitR, C30AH42A mutant
3vod-assembly1_A 1.00 0.79 0.23 0.44 19% 27% / 48% 5.7e-03 sig 3vod-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of mutant MarR C80S from E.coli
5yhy-assembly1_A 1.00 0.81 0.23 0.41 25% 26% / 44% 9.4e-03 sig 5yhy-assembly1_A Structure of Lactococcus lactis ZitR, C30S mutant

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 83.0, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 7

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1459c (- strand, 47 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv1461 (+ strand, -4 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv1460 · Rv1461 · Rv1462 · Rv1463 · csd · Rv1465 · Rv1466

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 7: Rv1460 · Rv1461 · Rv1462 · Rv1463 · csd · Rv1465 · Rv1466 — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1507) exponential phase: operon of 7, Rv1460 · Rv1461 · Rv1462 · Rv1463 · Rv1464 · Rv1465 · Rv1466 (coverage 91.74)
stationary phase: operon of 7, Rv1460 · Rv1461 · Rv1462 · Rv1463 · Rv1464 · Rv1465 · Rv1466 (coverage 14.85) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE) transcription factor

Regulated by (5 TF) Rv0081 (activates) · mmpR5 (activates) · trcR (activates) · sufR (activates) · Rv1816 (activates)
Regulonthis transcription factor regulates 7 target gene(s)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: sufD (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 906, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 80 partners at medium confidence (55 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 80 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1462 sufD hypothetical protein 909 906 ctx neighborhood:882
Rv1465 nitrogen fixation related protein 919 894 ctx neighborhood:881
Rv1463 sufC ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 891 891 ctx neighborhood:882
Rv1464 csd cysteine desulfurase 886 886 ctx neighborhood:882
Rv1466 hypothetical protein 881 882 ctx neighborhood:881
Rv3167c TetR family transcriptional regulator 853 848 coexpression:848
Rv2359 zur zinc uptake regulation protein 847 847 coexpression:842
Rv0212c nadR transcriptional regulator NadR 827 828 coexpression:827
Rv1189 sigI ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigI 825 826 coexpression:800
Rv1461 sufB hypothetical protein 830 823 ctx neighborhood:783
Rv1674c transcriptional regulator 824 823 coexpression:822
Rv1931c transcriptional regulator 810 810 coexpression:810
Rv1725c hypothetical protein 808 809 coexpression:809
Rv3183 higA3 transcriptional regulator 808 808 coexpression:808
Rv1167c transcriptional regulator 812 805 coexpression:805

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: transcriptional regulator
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: suf operon transcriptional regulator SufR
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): HTH_20 PF12840.14 (E=9e-09), HTH_24 PF13412.13 (E=2e-08), HTH_5 PF01022.27 (E=2e-06), HTH_11 PF08279.19 (E=2e-06)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215976.2)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — HTH_20 (PF12840.14), HTH_24 (PF13412.13), HTH_5 (PF01022.27), HTH_11 (PF08279.19)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG2345
  • Curated reference: UniProt O53151 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 83.0)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 80 functional partner(s); context anchor sufD
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001562|Rv1460|sufR
MTSTTLPHRASLVDRSTEFCHTDVVKIPAVSTTVPAAVSDGHTRRAIVRLLLESGSITAGEIGDRLGLSAAGVRRHLDALIEAGDAEASAAAPWQQVGRGRPAKRYRLTAAGRAKLDHSYDDLASAAMRQLREIGGEEAVRTFARRRIDAILADVAPADGPDDAALEAAAERIATALSKAGYVATTTRVGGPIHGVQICQHHCPVSHVAEEFPELCETEQQAMAEVLGTHVQRLATIVNGDCACTTHVPLSPAPSPRPPATSTEGASR