Rv0585c Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv0585c · MTBC0 mtbc0_000615 · 795 aa · 685436–687823 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_215099.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)integral membrane protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationlysylphosphatidylglycerol synthase transmembrane domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Lysylphosphatidylglycerol synthase transmembrane domain-containing protein. Pfam: LPG_synthase_TM (PF03706.19).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication discusses this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 1 record carries a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
[Identification and evaluation of T cell epitopes of Rv0585c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis]. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.05.022 2017
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv0585c, Mb0600c, MMAR_0953, MSMEG_1199 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
[Identification and evaluation of T cell epitopes of Rv0585c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis]. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.05.022 names it Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2017

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.35 (95% CI -0.35 to 4.29). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.226 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=21 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0600c · 99.9% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0953 · 81.8% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_1199 · 75.2% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000614 · 99.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O53781 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameProbable conserved integral membrane protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category T Signal transduction mechanisms
eggNOG descriptionintegral membrane protein
Orthologous groupCOG0392
KEGG orthology K07027

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS 0.378 · purifying
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 9 synonymous, 9 missense, 0 nonsense, 3 frameshift
Disruption 3 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 1.05% of strains (1492) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — L6, L9; union over all sites: 1 831 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:682719:GA:G · frameshift · 1 492 strains — fixed in 75 sub-clades of L6, L9, totalling 1 455 strains — 97.5% of the 1 493 strains in the lineages named (largest: L6 91/94, L6.2.1.2.2.3 74/74, L6.2.1.2.2.2.2.2 56/56, L6.1.2.1.2.2.2.2 50/50, L6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.2 45/45, L6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.3 38/38, …)
  • NC_000962.3:682812:C:CG · frameshift · 195 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:682060:TG:T · frameshift · 144 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of L9, totalling 9 strains — 25.0% of the 36 strains in the lineage named (largest: L9.2.2 9/9)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.216 · 11 consensus substitution(s)
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.216) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion; the dN/dS moves by more than 0.1 when the consensus threshold goes from 50% to 90%: treat it as indicative
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 49/53 (92%) · mean identity 80.1% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 49/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 67.0%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 42 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 42 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.810, mean read count 58.2941176471. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 42 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 7 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance0.66 ppm · rank 3330/3519 (5.4th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (14 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)14

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length795 aa
Molecular weight84.0 kDa
Theoretical pI9.57
GRAVY0.624 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index121.1
Aromaticity0.075
Instability index39.6 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
LPG_synthase_TMPF03706.19 6.9e-27498–782 Lysylphosphatidylglycerol synthase TM region

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 83.0, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 83.0

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
7f47-assembly1_A 1.00 0.54 0.26 0.25 16% 38% / 37% 2.7e-04 sig 7f47-assembly1_A Cryo-EM structure of Rhizobium etli MprF
7vnx-assembly1_A 1.00 0.55 0.18 0.55 18% 27% / 81% 1.1e-04 sig 7vnx-assembly1_A Crystal structure of TkArkI
1zar-assembly1_A 1.00 0.56 0.19 0.50 14% 28% / 74% 7.7e-04 sig 1zar-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of A.fulgidus Rio2 Kinase Complexed With ADP and Manganese Ions
5wvd-assembly1_B 1.00 0.52 0.17 0.52 16% 29% / 92% 1.3e-03 sig 5wvd-assembly1_B Structure of Mnk1 in complex with DS12881479
1zao-assembly1_A 1.00 0.53 0.19 0.48 16% 28% / 73% 2.2e-03 sig 1zao-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of A.fulgidus Rio2 Kinase Complexed With ATP and Manganese Ions

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 83.0, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv0584 (+ strand, 22 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)mce2R (+ strand, 137 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0613) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: mce2C (Mce family protein Mce2C), medium confidence (score 613, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 30 partners at medium confidence (0 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 30 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0591 mce2C Mce family protein Mce2C 613 613 ctx neighborhood:545
Rv0594 mce2F Mce family protein Mce2F 603 603 ctx neighborhood:537
Rv0592 mce2D Mce family protein Mce2D 600 600 ctx neighborhood:537
Rv0479c membrane protein 566 566 ctx cooccurence:566
Rv0586 mce2R HTH-type transcriptional regulator Mce2R 566 545 ctx neighborhood:545
Rv0590 mce2B Mce-family protein Mce2B; Rv0590, (MTCY19H5.32c), len: 275 aa. Mce2B; belongs to 24-membered Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mce protein family ( 545 545 ctx neighborhood:544
Rv0587 yrbE2A hypothetical protein 545 545 ctx neighborhood:545
Rv0589 mce2A Mce family protein Mce2A 545 545 ctx neighborhood:544
Rv0588 yrbE2B hypothetical protein 545 545 ctx neighborhood:545
Rv0590A Mce-family related protein; Rv0590A, len: 84 aa. Probable continuation of mce2B|Rv0590. Can find no frameshift to account for this. Possible 545 544 ctx neighborhood:544
Rv0593 lprL Mce family lipoprotein LprL 542 542 ctx neighborhood:537
Rv1863c integral membrane protein 535 535 ctx cooccurence:525
Rv2876 transmembrane protein 503 503 ctx cooccurence:503
Rv2180c integral membrane protein 492 492 ctx cooccurence:489
Rv1203c hypothetical protein 470 470 ctx cooccurence:467

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: integral membrane protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: lysylphosphatidylglycerol synthase transmembrane domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): LPG_synthase_TM PF03706.19 (E=7e-27)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215099.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — LPG_synthase_TM (PF03706.19)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0392
  • Curated reference: UniProt O53781 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 83.0)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 30 functional partner(s); context anchor mce2C
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000615|Rv0585c|
MRVDGRDIGVSGNLLQPLTRRTNDIIRAVLAAIYLVAVITSSLITRPQWVALEKSISEIVGVLSPSQSDLVYLGYGLAILALPFVILIGLIVSRQWKLLGAYAAAGLMAVLPLSISSSRIAAPRWHFDLSDRLATLLAQFLDDPRWIAMLAAVLTVSGPWLPARWRHWWWALLLAFVPIHLVVSAIVPARSLLGLAVGWLVGALVVLVVGTPALEVPLDGAIRALAKRGFAVSGLAVVRPAGPGPLVLSAACEQPNAGACSEALIELYGPHQSGGGALRQLWLKLTLRGTETAPLQASMRRAVEHRALMAIAFGDLGMANTTVIAVSPLDRGWTLYAHRPARGIGISECTKTTPTAHVWEALRTLHDQQISHGDLCSAEITVDNGAVLFGGFGEAEYGATDAQLQSDLAQLLVTTSALYDAEAAVTAAIDTFGKQAILAASRRLTKSAVPKRIRESITDPNAVIASTRAEVMRQTGADQIKAETITRFSRGQLIQLVLIGALVYVAYPFISTVPTFFSQLRTANWWWALLGLAVSALTYVGAAAALWACADGLVGFWKLSIMQVANTFAATTTPAGVGGLALSTRFLQKGGLTAVRATAAVALQQSVQVIVHLVLLILFSALAGTSTDLSHFVPNATVLYLIAGVALGIVGTFLFVPKLRRWLATAVRPKLREVTNDLIALAREPKRLALIVLGCAGTTLGAALALWASIEAFGGGTTFVTVTVVTMVGGTLASAAPTPGGVGAVEAALIGGLAAFGVPAALGVPSVLLYRLLTCWLPVFAGWQVMHWLTRHEMI