Rv0455c Family assigned · low

H37Rv Rv0455c · MTBC0 mtbc0_000477 · 148 aa · 548740–549186 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_214969.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDUF5078 domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)DUF5078; structure solved (PDB 8DRI, Rv0455c); fold characterised, function not established.
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 3 publications

Found under: H37Rv (3).

3 TB publications mention this gene. 3 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

PublicationDate
Intricate link between siderophore secretion and drug efflux in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1128/aac.01629-22 2023
A periplasmic cinched protein is required for siderophore secretion and virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29873-6 2022
Distinct differences in repertoires of low-molecular-mass secreted antigens of Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1128/JCM.38.12.4453-4458.2000 2000
3 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv0455c, Mb0463c, ML2380c, MMAR_0777, MSMEG_3494, MAB_2304c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Intricate link between siderophore secretion and drug efflux in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1128/aac.01629-22 Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2023
A periplasmic cinched protein is required for siderophore secretion and virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29873-6 Nat Commun 2022
Distinct differences in repertoires of low-molecular-mass secreted antigens of Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1128/JCM.38.12.4453-4458.2000 J Clin Microbiol 2000

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder22% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 87.7
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 33 aa [0-33]

carries a substantial disordered region (33/148 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 7.0

required for fitness in vivo (virulence / persistence factor); required under 3 weeks hypoxia; predicted secreted (signal peptide).

Corroborating evidenceconserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; STRING-coupled to echA2 (enoyl-CoA hydratase EchA2); structural lead available

This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): Lsr2 (lsr2).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -3.44 (95% CI -7.20 to 1.94). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.188 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=10 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0463c · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML2380c · 66.4% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0777 · 81.2% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_3494 · 48.3% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000476 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2304c · 60.3% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O53740 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameConserved protein

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Conserved protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionDomain of unknown function (DUF5078)
Orthologous group2ARRN

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacteriaceae

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 75.4% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Mycobacteriaceae) · mean identity 60.3%
detected in the sister family Mycobacteriaceae (M. abscessus) but not in the broader Corynebacteriales — a Mycobacteriaceae-restricted gene (single-genome rung: interpret with care)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

The two screens disagree on this gene: Tn-seq says non-essential (NE), CRISPRi says essential, with an estimate its own authors flag as not certain.

Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is one its own authors flag as NOT certain (vulnerability index -3.437), so it is the weaker of the two calls. Do not treat the CRISPRi essentiality as settled here. Atlas-wide, 104 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 12 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 12 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.833, mean read count 30.5. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 12 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain

This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.

Hypomorph strainRv0455c-TetOn 10.1 (TetON promoter 10)
Baseline knockdown fitness4.46 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown
Used in target deconvolutionyes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment)

Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness in mouse infection, day 10 (in vivo) -4.590.0096 required
fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) -4.590.002 required
differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) +4.120.019 disruption advantageous
Mutants exhibiting altered fitness in the absence of gene marP (other) +3.940.0 disruption advantageous
altered fitness under 3 weeks hypoxia (stress) -3.600.046 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 5 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.

Provenance note on a condition above. `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` carries no source in MtbTnDB's own metadata (col_desc.tsv leaves paper_title/paper_URL empty). Traced by the `Rv0537c` companion project (2026-09-12): Weizhen Xu, PhD thesis, Weill Cornell Medicine, 2017, hdl:1813/64728 ("Genetic Screening In Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Utilizing Transposon Insertion Sequencing"), whose abstract describes a TnSeq genetic-interaction screen naming marP. Never published as a peer-reviewed article.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 14 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance419.0 ppm · rank 479/3519 (86.4th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) signal peptide

Predictionpredicted secreted protein (signal peptide)
DeepTMHMM classSP

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length148 aa
Molecular weight16.6 kDa
Theoretical pI6.39
GRAVY-0.182 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index69.4
Aromaticity0.142
Instability index55.5 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DUF5078PF16877.11 5.1e-5433–147 Domain of unknown function (DUF5078)

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 8drg (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 3 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
8drg X-ray diffraction 1.8 Å 100%
8dri X-ray diffraction 2.0 Å 100%
8dqy X-ray diffraction 2.1 Å 100%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (3 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)

ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 85.0 (confident). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.

Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.

TargetProbTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8dri-assembly2_B self-match 1.00 0.93 0.73 0.92 100% 77% / 99% 1.7e-15 sig 8dri-assembly2_B Structure of Rv0455c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
7ref-assembly2_B 1.00 0.86 0.72 0.86 51% 78% / 98% 3.9e-10 sig 7ref-assembly2_B Structure of MS3494 from Mycobacterium smegmatis
7ohp-assembly1_b 0.02 0.23 0.15 0.07 20% 58% / 22% 7.0e+00 7ohp-assembly1_b Nog1-TAP associated immature ribosomal particles from S. cerevisiae after rpL25 expression shut down, population A

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 87.7

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8dri-assembly2_B 1.00 0.99 0.76 0.98 100% 77% / 99% 2.3e-16 sig 8dri-assembly2_B Structure of Rv0455c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
7ref-assembly2_B 1.00 0.93 0.75 0.91 51% 78% / 98% 1.1e-11 sig 7ref-assembly2_B Structure of MS3494 from Mycobacterium smegmatis

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 87.7, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)PPE11 (+ strand, 644 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)echA2 (- strand, 67 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0471) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv0455c (coverage 217.01)
stationary phase: operon of 2, Rv0455c (coverage 94.11) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (2 TF) Rv1255c (activates) · Rv1353c (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: echA2 (enoyl-CoA hydratase EchA2), high confidence (score 796, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 15 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0456c echA2 enoyl-CoA hydratase EchA2 796 796 ctx neighborhood:795
Rv0457c peptidase 635 636 ctx neighborhood:635
Rv0397A dark hypothetical protein 461 461 ctx neighborhood:461
Rv0559c hypothetical protein 665 73 textmining:654
Rv0338c iron-sulfur-binding reductase 662 68 textmining:653
Rv0489 gpm1 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-dependent phosphoglycerate mutase 443 55 textmining:435
Rv0511 hemD uroporphyrin-III C-methyltransferase 516 52 textmining:511
Rv0677c mmpS5 membrane protein MmpS5 520 50 textmining:516
Rv0676c mmpL5 transmembrane transport protein MmpL5 514 50 textmining:510
Rv0560c benzoquinone methyltransferase 434 47 textmining:431
Rv1127c ppdK pyruvate, phosphate dikinase PpdK 505 46 textmining:503
Rv1338 murI glutamate racemase 425 46 textmining:422
Rv2047c hypothetical protein 657 42 textmining:657
Rv1085c hemolysin-like protein 652 41 textmining:652
Rv1432 dehydrogenase 630 41 textmining:630

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF5078 domain-containing protein
  • Pfam: DUF5078 PF16877.11
  • Foldseek best: 8dri-assembly2_B Structure of Rv0455c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (prob 1.00, E=2e-15, TM=0.93)
  • (structure-only promotion reviewed by hand, 2026-06-01)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214969.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF5078 (PF16877.11)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2ARRN
  • Curated reference: UniProt O53740 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 85.0, confident)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 87.7)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 15 functional partner(s); context anchor echA2
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000477|Rv0455c|
MSRLSSILRAGAAFLVLGIAAATFPQSAAADSTEDFPIPRRMIATTCDAEQYLAAVRDTSPVYYQRYMIDFNNHANLQQATINKAHWFFSLSPAERRDYSEHFYNGDPLTFAWVNHMKIFFNNKGVVAKGTEVCNGYPAGDMSVWNWA