Rv2491 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2491 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002653 · 207 aa · 2829555–2830178 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_217007.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationTIGR00725 family protein
Revised (this work)TIGR00725 family protein. Pfam: LDcluster4 (PF18306.7).
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.

Named in the body of 4 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv2491 (4).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “TIGR00725 family protein”: nothing found. no abstract in PubMed contains this protein name in a mycobacterial context: the silence measured under the locus tag is confirmed under the protein name.

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 7.0

required for fitness in vivo (virulence / persistence factor).

Corroborating evidenceconserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; Tn-seq growth-defect/essential; STRING-coupled to vapC38 (ribonuclease VapC38); structural lead available

This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 2 % of gene

NeighbourRv2492 (Rv2492, + strand)
Overlap11 bp, 2 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): Lsr2 (lsr2).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.07 (95% CI -0.05 to 0.21). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain (their own confidence call, not a p-value threshold). Its guide library did sample a range of repression strengths (str_span=0.973 on a 0-1 scale, thanks to at least one guide <=18 nt; n_guides=56 descriptive only), so the dose-response fit is not starved of titration the way most 'not certain' genes are -- the uncertainty here is the authors' own confidence call on the fit, not a design limitation of the guide library. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim without checking `certain` first.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (EC number). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2519 · 100.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002576 · 99.5% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt I6XEF6 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt nameTIGR00725 family protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptioncytokinin biosynthetic process
Orthologous groupCOG1611
EC number EC 3.2.2.10
KEGG orthology K06966
KEGG pathways map00230, map00240

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 1.671 · quasi-invariant (6 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 1 synonymous, 4 missense, 1 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.20% of strains (292) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) site unique fixé — Bovis; union over all sites: 452 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:2806868:GA:G · frameshift · 292 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:2807264:G:T · nonsense · 160 strains — fixed in 8 sub-clades of Bovis, totalling 145 strains — 1.1% of the 13 187 strains in the lineage named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.1 33/33, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.3 31/31, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.1 28/28, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2 15/15, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.2 13/13, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.2 13/13, …)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.335 (low power) · 2 consensus substitution(s)
low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 0/53 (0%) · 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives
NOT MTBC-specific despite passing the strict presence filter: no hit at pident>=30 & qcov>=50 across the 53 non-MTBC genomes, BUT sub-threshold tblastn hit(s) exist (M_syngnathidarum:33.0id/41cov;n=2;mtbap=0) — the gene is PRESENT BUT DIVERGENT in at least one non-MTBC Mycobacterium, not a genus-level innovation. Do not frame as MTBC-specific nor as a host-adaptation factor. Human non-homology, if needed, must be established directly (BLASTp vs human proteome), never inferred from this field.
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 3/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 32.7%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential

DeJesus 2017 callGD · growth-defect
What the call meansgrowth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential
TA sites (Himar1) 16 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 11 growth-defect, 5 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.688, mean read count 42.4545454545. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
15 of these 16 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 1 of this ORF's 16 TA sites lies inside Rv2492 (1 site), leaving 15 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 15 exclusive sites.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) -3.030.045 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length207 aa
Molecular weight21.7 kDa
Theoretical pI6.97
GRAVY-0.048 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index81.1
Aromaticity0.072
Instability index28.8 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
LDcluster4PF18306.7 1.4e-3827–152 SLOG cluster4 family

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 85.0, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 85.0

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
6y01-assembly1_CCC 1.00 0.88 0.70 0.88 30% 85% / 99% 2.2e-12 sig 6y01-assembly1_CCC The structure of the molybdenum cofactor binding protein from the phototrophic bacterium Rippkaea orientalis
1rcu-assembly1_D 1.00 0.83 0.69 0.83 22% 82% / 99% 1.4e-09 sig 1rcu-assembly1_D X-RAY STRUCTURE OF TM1055 NORTHEAST STRUCTURAL GENOMICS CONSORTIUM TARGET VT76
2iz6-assembly1_A-2 1.00 0.84 0.66 0.84 28% 84% / 99% 2.1e-09 sig 2iz6-assembly1_A-2 Structure of the Chlamydomonas rheinhardtii Moco Carrier Protein
2iz7-assembly1_A 1.00 0.86 0.69 0.86 28% 85% / 99% 4.6e-09 sig 2iz7-assembly1_A structure of Moco Carrier Protein from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
2iz5-assembly1_C 1.00 0.84 0.65 0.84 27% 84% / 99% 2.4e-09 sig 2iz5-assembly1_C FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOLYBDENUM COFACTOR CARRIER PROTEIN MCP FROM CHLAMYDOMONAS REINHARDTII

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 85.0, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2490a (- strand, 135 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2492 (+ strand, -11 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2491 · Rv2492

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2566) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2492 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 967, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 15 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2492 hypothetical protein 967 967 ctx neighborhood:882 coexpression:731
Rv2494 vapC38 ribonuclease VapC38 619 619 ctx neighborhood:619
Rv2493 vapB38 antitoxin VapB38 619 619 ctx neighborhood:619
Rv0570 nrdZ vitamin B12-dependent ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase 430 431 coexpression:413
Rv3051c nrdE ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase subunit alpha 426 427 coexpression:409
Rv3048c nrdF2 ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase subunit beta NrdF2 418 418 coexpression:408
Rv0233 nrdB ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase subunit beta NrdB 417 418 coexpression:407
Rv1981c nrdF1 ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase subunit beta NrdF1 416 417 coexpression:406
Rv1094 desA2 acyl-ACP desaturase DesA 408 408 coexpression:402
Rv0824c desA1 acyl-ACP desaturase DesA 406 406 coexpression:400
Rv3846 sodA superoxide dismutase 403 92
Rv0808 purF amidophosphoribosyltransferase 820 85 textmining:812
Rv2883c pyrH uridylate kinase 656 47 textmining:654
Rv1205 log hypothetical protein 809 44 textmining:809
Rv2017 transcriptional regulator 631 44 textmining:630

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: TIGR00725 family protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): LDcluster4 PF18306.7 (E=1e-38)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217007.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — LDcluster4 (PF18306.7)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1611
  • Curated reference: UniProt I6XEF6 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 85.0)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 15 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2492
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002653|Rv2491|
MVDTSAPASRLDTDPRRAHVSLSKHPYQIGVFGSGTIGPRVYELAYQVGAEIAKQGHILISGGMTGTMEASSRGASDADGLVVGVLPGDKFTDGNAYSTIKILSGMQFARNYITGLSCHGAIVVGGSSGAYEEARRVWEGRGPVVVLANSGSPTGASAQMLSMQEIFGVAFPEDKPKPWRVFSAATPAESVSLVIGLIRKGYAQHEP