Rv2016 Resolved · medium auto-curated
H37Rv Rv2016 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002146 ·
191 aa ·
2287039–2287614 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_216532.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | HicA-family toxin (TASmania candidate T144), the toxic component of a functional type II toxin-antitoxin system with Rv2017 as its cognate antitoxin (TASmania candidate A32, Pfam HTH_3). Directly validated by Akarsu et al. 2019 (TASmania, PLoS Comput Biol, PMID 31022176): among 11 in silico TA candidates selected for wet-lab testing (out of >2 million candidates mined genome-wide), Rv2016 was one of only 4 showing 'robust toxicity' upon heterologous expression in M. smegmatis, and a co-expression rescue assay (their Fig. 6) showed that Rv2017 suppresses Rv2016 toxicity -- direct mechanistic confirmation of the toxin-antitoxin pairing, not mere operon co-annotation. Consistent with this atlas's own prior data: Rv2016-Rv2017 form a real 2-gene operon (toxin-then-antitoxin gene order, matching TASmania's reported T->A orientation), and the regulation layer already shows Rv2017 represses Rv2016 -- the expected autoregulation of a TA operon by its antitoxin. No Pfam domain reaches this atlas's own --cut_ga gathering threshold on Rv2016, but HicA domains are short (~50 aa) and often fall below strict Pfam GA cutoffs; TASmania uses a curated HMM pipeline dedicated to TA-system detection rather than a general Pfam scan, so this is not a contradiction. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
Curation note: P16.24 (2026-08-17): le catalogue Ribo-RET de Smith et al. 2022 (classe "Isoform", traductome H37Rv en culture standard log-phase) place un site de demarrage a 2263390 au lieu du start annote 2263426 (delta -36 nt = 12 codon(s) en amont), MEME stop codon (2264001) donc MEME cadre de lecture -- candidat de mauvais START annote, PAS un changement de fonction (verdict dark maintenu). Aucune densite ribosomique ni peptide MS chiffres pour cette classe dans le supplement (colonnes vides pour "Isoform", contrairement a "Novel"): preuve = appel de pic Ribo-RET seul, non hierarchisable. Ribo-RET ne couvre qu'une condition de croissance : ceci ne dit rien sur les autres dark sans signal ici. Source: Smith C, Canestrari JG, Wang AJ et al., "Pervasive translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis", eLife 2022;11:e73980 (doi:10.7554/eLife.73980; PMC9094748), Supplementary File 1A, classe "Isoform".
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). A full-text search does however find 1 paper(s) naming this gene in their body text — see the full-text lead field below (this is the paper on which the requalification of this gene as a HicA-family toxin rests). The gene is therefore not unmentioned, and this page no longer claims that it is unstudied.
- TASmania: A bacterial Toxin-Antitoxin Systems database. 2019 — PMID 31022176
CONFIRMED, not refuted: see function_revised/evidence/references -- requalified on 2026-08-18 (P16.2a-septies) as a HicA-family TA toxin, corroborated by a toxicity assay and a genetic rescue by its cognate antitoxin Rv2017. Supersedes the 2026-08-17 entry, which read only the abstract-level framing and missed that Rv2016 is named among the 6 experimentally-validated hits in the full text.
REQUALIFIED (positive finding) -- see function_revised/evidence/references.
Confidence set to medium, not high: dedicated toxicity+rescue evidence (stronger than a generic large-scale screen hit), but the precise biochemical mechanism is inferred from HicA family membership rather than directly demonstrated for this specific protein, and no Pfam domain reaches this atlas's own gathering threshold.
Europe PMC full-text sweep (P16.2a-septies, phase138, wave 3, 2026-08-17/18) candidate, deep-dived 2026-08-18 against tbmonitor (title+abstract) and, where the abstract was insufficient, Europe PMC fullTextXML, plus phase140_locus_transposition_check.py.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv2017 (Rv2017, + strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 1 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Binding-pocket screen (P2Rank, geometric prediction) detector blind at this length
| Pockets found | 2 (best probability 0.343) |
|---|---|
| Model length screened | 191 aa |
Read with care. This protein (191 aa) is below the size where this detector has meaningful power: on proven enzymes, only 3.8% (1/26) under 200 aa reach this layer's P2Rank confidence threshold of best_probability >= 0.70, versus 60.5% (75/124) above it (P16.3b calibration, negative control EsxA/EsxB-scale panel). Both figures are recall AT 0.70, which is also the best separation this detector reaches on that panel (Youden J = 0.416) and whose false-positive rate above 200 aa is 18.9% (81.1% specificity); the looser 0.50 that appears elsewhere in this repository would raise recall above 200 aa to 74.2% and drop specificity to 64.9%. A negative or weak pocket result here should NOT be read as evidence against a ligand-binding role -- the test essentially has no power at this length, not that the protein lacks a site. The same holds in the other direction, and that half was missing here: a STRONG score at this length is not a result either. The same calibration panel does carry that other arm below 200 aa, and the two do not separate: the 3.8% above is matched by 6.6% (5/76) of proteins annotated as non-catalytic clearing 0.70 (Fisher p = 1.00; 15.4% against 11.8% at 0.50, p = 0.73). At this length the score therefore carries no measured information in either direction -- which is a stronger statement than untested power, and the reason a strong score here is not a result. P16.3e, calibration phase72b_pocket_calibration.py, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Rv0576 (Rv0576).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 1.41 (95% CI -0.15 to 4.07). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.246 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=8 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2039
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002085
· 100.0% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O53462
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Uncharacterized protein |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| Orthologous group | 2BFQR |
|---|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Lineage-specific relaxation (candidate, one evidence handle) 2 lineage(s)
| L4 | disrupted in 0.2% of 55 563 L4 strains, vs 0.0% pooled across the whole MTBC (145k strains) · odds ratio 8.26 · FDR q=0.0 |
|---|---|
| L6 | disrupted in 1.2% of 1 364 L6 strains, vs 0.0% pooled across the whole MTBC (145k strains) · odds ratio 20.02 · FDR q=0.0 |
Candidate lineage-specific loss-of-function signal: rare/absent in the other well-sampled lineages (<5%) but risen in the listed lineage(s). ONE handle, not a verdict change (P8 two-handle policy) -- the general phenomenon of lineage-specific gene loss reflecting ecotype-specific selective pressure is already established at genome scale (Silva-Pereira et al. 2024); this signal on an individual dark gene needs an independent second handle before any requalification.
Caveat: Sample-size heterogeneity across MTBC lineages (up to 4 orders of magnitude, 16 smaller lineages excluded for n<500); essentiality is NOT resolvable per lineage (TnSeq data is H37Rv-only). For the two smallest adequate lineages (L5 n=630, L6 n=1364) the frequency floor bottoms out at the absolute minimum of 3 carrier strains -- a handful of strains from a SINGLE transmission cluster (clonal outbreak) can pass this floor without representing independent evolutionary origins of the disrupting allele; no phylogenetic correction for clonal sampling was applied. Treat low-count hits in these two lineages with extra caution.
Reference: Silva-Pereira TT, Soler-Camargo NC, Sá Guimarães AM 2024, Microbiology Spectrum, doi:10.1128/spectrum.02289-23
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.442
· 19 consensus substitution(s) under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.442) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 1/53 (2%) · mean identity 59.8%
· 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives SENSITIVITY DOWNGRADE: a divergent homolog is detectable at relaxed thresholds (weak hit 60%/65%cov in M_malmoense — likely present but divergent); NOT a robust MTBC-specific innovation — present but divergent. The strict tblastn absence was a coverage/identity-threshold artefact. |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
7 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
7 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 84.8571428571.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 7 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Read with some caution: only 7 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 7 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 19.5 ppm · rank 2355/3519 (33.1th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 191 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 21.4 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 5.79 |
| GRAVY | -0.31 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 88.4 |
| Aromaticity | 0.079 |
| Instability index | 34.0 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 83.5, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 89.6 (confident). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2e2l-assembly1_E |
0.13 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 10% | 27% / 16% | 1.6e+00 | 2e2l-assembly1_E Helicobacter pylori formamidase AmiF contains a fine-tuned cysteine-glutamate-lysine catalytic triad |
2e2k-assembly1_C |
0.12 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 10% | 27% / 16% | 1.7e+00 | 2e2k-assembly1_C Helicobacter pylori formamidase AmiF contains a fine-tuned cysteine-glutamate-lysine catalytic triad |
2vhh-assembly1_A-2 |
0.08 | 0.53 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 11% | 19% / 10% | 2.8e+00 | 2vhh-assembly1_A-2 Crystal structure of a pyrimidine degrading enzyme from Drosophila melanogaster |
2dyu-assembly1_B |
0.06 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 10% | 27% / 16% | 5.5e+00 | 2dyu-assembly1_B Helicobacter pylori formamidase AmiF contains a fine-tuned cysteine-glutamate-lysine catalytic triad |
2e2k-assembly1_A |
0.06 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 11% | 24% / 14% | 6.6e+00 | 2e2k-assembly1_A Helicobacter pylori formamidase AmiF contains a fine-tuned cysteine-glutamate-lysine catalytic triad |
2e2l-assembly1_D |
0.06 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 10% | 27% / 16% | 5.9e+00 | 2e2l-assembly1_D Helicobacter pylori formamidase AmiF contains a fine-tuned cysteine-glutamate-lysine catalytic triad |
7t10-assembly1_R |
0.05 | 0.43 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 6% | 36% / 24% | 7.5e+00 | 7t10-assembly1_R CryoEM structure of somatostatin receptor 2 in complex with somatostatin-14 and Gi3 |
2vhi-assembly1_A |
0.05 | 0.53 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 11% | 19% / 10% | 5.9e+00 | 2vhi-assembly1_A Crystal structure of a pyrimidine degrading enzyme from Drosophila melanogaster |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv2015c (- strand, 353 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2017 (+ strand, -4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv2016 · Rv2017
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
Rv2016 · Rv2017
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2072) |
expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 18.32)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (2 TF) |
Rv0047c (activates) · Rv2017 (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2017 (transcriptional regulator), high confidence (score 846, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 25 partners at medium confidence (1 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 25 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2017 |
transcriptional regulator | 927 | 846 ctx | neighborhood:809 textmining:544 |
Rv2018 vapB45 |
hypothetical protein | 470 | 470 ctx | neighborhood:443 |
Rv2019 vapC45 |
hypothetical protein | 577 | 430 ctx | neighborhood:427 |
Rv2515c |
hypothetical protein | 476 | 102 | textmining:441 |
Rv2165c rsmH |
rRNA small subunit methyltransferase H | 444 | 55 | textmining:436 |
Rv1765c |
hypothetical protein | 442 | 51 | textmining:437 |
Rv3641c fic |
cell filamentation protein Fic | 654 | 50 | textmining:651 |
Rv0208c trmB |
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase | 440 | 50 | textmining:435 |
Rv2514c |
hypothetical protein | 624 | 47 | textmining:622 |
Rv0078A |
hypothetical protein | 441 | 47 | textmining:438 |
Rv0207c |
hypothetical protein | 436 | 47 | textmining:433 |
Rv0229c vapC51 |
hypothetical protein | 651 | 46 | textmining:650 |
Rv0268c |
hypothetical protein | 631 | 46 | textmining:630 |
Rv3383c idsB |
polyprenyl synthetase IdsB | 654 | 44 | textmining:653 |
Rv1469 ctpD |
cobalt/nickel-exporting P-type ATPase | 653 | 44 | textmining:652 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Robust growth-inhibition toxicity in M. smegmatis upon heterologous expression, one of only 4/11 directly-tested TASmania candidates reaching this tier (Akarsu et al. 2019, PMID 31022176, PLoS Comput Biol, PMC6504116).
- Genetic rescue: co-expression of the cognate antitoxin Rv2017 suppresses Rv2016 toxicity (same source, Fig. 6) -- direct mechanistic demonstration of the TA pairing.
- Consistent with this atlas's pre-existing operon data: Rv2016-Rv2017 form a real 2-gene operon, toxin-then-antitoxin gene order matching TASmania's T->A orientation.
- Consistent with this atlas's pre-existing regulation data: Rv2017 represses Rv2016, the expected autoregulation of a TA module by its antitoxin.
- Previously checked on 2026-08-17 and judged (incorrectly, on an incomplete reading) as 'purely computational, no dedicated characterization' -- corrected here after reading the full text: Rv2016 is one of the 6 experimentally-confirmed hits named explicitly in the paper, not merely one of the >2 million in silico candidates.
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216532.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2BFQR - Curated reference: UniProt O53462 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 89.6, confident)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 83.5)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
25 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv2017 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Lineage-specific relaxation: per-lineage disruption fraction vs the pooled MTBC (145k strains), Fisher exact test with FDR correction; general phenomenon established at genome scale by Silva-Pereira et al. 2024 (doi:10.1128/spectrum.02289-23) -- one evidence handle on this atlas's own dark genes, never sufficient alone for a verdict change
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: Akarsu H, Bordes P, Mansour M, Bigot DJ, Genevaux P, Falquet L (2019). TASmania: A bacterial Toxin-Antitoxin Systems database. PLoS Comput Biol 15(4):e1006946. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006946 PMID:31022176
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002146|Rv2016| MTELGDKFLAALVGTIRDTRFDIADMRNWRPGWFPTMHSRCLSNLIHDRIWAHLVTLIASNPGTSIKDKGATREIVVGAHLRLRIKRHHAGDEISTYPTRTAIEFWQQGSQPAFPGLEEVRIAVGYRWDPDTREIGAPLLSLRDGKDHVIWVVELDEPAAGVKITWTPIEPTLPSIDFGDLGEDSGASGER
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2016? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2016