espI Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3876 · MTBC0 mtbc0_004110 · 666 aa · 4377220–4379220 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_218393.1

Ancestral sequence corrected: the ancestral gene call started downstream of the true initiation codon. START RESTORED. The anchored locus mtbc0_004110 is the right gene, but the PGAP call starts downstream of the true initiation codon, so the served protein was the C-terminal fragment. The full ancestral ORF is present and colinear with H37Rv.

The protein served here is now 666 aa (ancestral locus mtbc0_004110, 4377220–4379220, start codon ATG, 100.0 % identical to the H37Rv product, differences: none), against 531 aa before the correction (locus mtbc0_004110).

Recomputed on the restored sequence: disorder, domains, localization, protparam. Layers keyed on an external identifier (UniProt, AlphaFold DB, orthologues, PDB) already described the full-length protein and were left untouched. The served ancestral protein is the translation of the ancestral region homologous to the h37rv cds under the 1:1 position liftover (p19.7), not the translation of the pgap gene call, because the gene call is what failed here. Corrected on 2026-08-10 (P18.22). The ancestral protein served here is now the translation of the ancestral region homologous to the H37Rv CDS, 666 aa (100.0 % identical to the H37Rv product, 0 internal stop), instead of the previous 531 aa. Layers computed on the sequence (Pfam domains, ProtParam, disorder, DeepTMHMM localization) were recomputed; each carries a `computed_on` field. Earlier snapshots of this record, including the Zenodo bundle, still carry the short sequence.
annotation_mtbc P18.22 (phase109) — restored ancestral ORF; supersedes the P19.6/P19.7 anchor audit and the P18.21 arbitration.

Non-canonical microproteins (overlapping smORFs)

2 MS-proven microproteins from the separate microproteome track overlap this locus (existence proven, function unknown; not counted among the canonical genes).

MicroproteinRelationshipLengthEssentiality
gORF_122227 same-strand overlap (alternative frame) 91 aa —
tORF_103888 same-strand overlap (alternative frame) 91 aa —

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)ESX-1 secretion-associated protein EspI
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationMinD/ParA family protein
Revised (this work)MinD/ParA family protein. Pfam: CbiA (PF01656.30), AAA_31 (PF13614.13), ArsA_ATPase (PF02374.22).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 8 publications

8 TB publications mention this gene. 8 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 7 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 2 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 2-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (2)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 8: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Localization of EccA3 at the growing pole in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1186/s12866-022-02554-6 2022
Recombinant preparation and functional studies of EspI ATP binding domain from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2016.03.009 2016
Identification of Novel RD1 Antigens and Their Combinations for Diagnosis of Sputum Smear-/Culture+ TB Patients. doi:10.1155/2016/7486425 2016
EspI regulates the ESX-1 secretion system in response to ATP levels in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1111/mmi.12718 2014
Identification, diagnostic potential, and natural expression of immunodominant seroreactive peptides encoded by five Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific genomic regions. doi:10.1128/CVI.00405-10 2011
12 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 8 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv3876, espI, Mb3906, ML0048c, MMAR_5451, MSMEG_0067 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Localization of EccA(3) at the growing pole in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1186/s12866-022-02554-6 BMC Microbiol 2022
A lung-on-chip model of early Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection reveals an essential role for alveolar epithelial cells in controlling bacterial growth. doi:10.7554/eLife.59961 Elife 2020
Alveolar Macrophages Provide an Early Mycobacterium tuberculosis Niche and Initiate Dissemination. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2018.08.001 Cell Host Microbe 2018
Recombinant preparation and functional studies of EspI ATP binding domain from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2016.03.009 names it Protein Expr Purif 2016
Identification of Novel RD1 Antigens and Their Combinations for Diagnosis of Sputum Smear-/Culture+ TB Patients. doi:10.1155/2016/7486425 Biomed Res Int 2016
EspI regulates the ESX-1 secretion system in response to ATP levels in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1111/mmi.12718 names it Mol Microbiol 2014
A database for animal tuberculosis (mycoDB.es) within the context of the Spanish national programme for eradication of bovine tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2011.10.008 Infect Genet Evol 2012
Identification, diagnostic potential, and natural expression of immunodominant seroreactive peptides encoded by five Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific genomic regions. doi:10.1128/CVI.00405-10 Clin Vaccine Immunol 2011
High spoligotype diversity within a Mycobacterium bovis population: clues to understanding the demography of the pathogen in Europe. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.007 Vet Microbiol 2010
Dissection of ESAT-6 system 1 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and impact on immunogenicity and virulence. doi:10.1128/IAI.74.1.88-98.2006 Infect Immun 2006
The RD1 proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: expression in Mycobacterium smegmatis and biochemical characterization. doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00205-3 Microbes Infect 2003
Bacterial artificial chromosome-based comparative genomic analysis identifies Mycobacterium microti as a natural ESAT-6 deletion mutant. doi:10.1128/IAI.70.10.5568-5578.2002 Infect Immun 2002

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered

Predicted disorder56% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 65.7
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 375 aa [0-375]

carries a substantial disordered region (375/666 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighboureccD1 (Rv3877, + strand)
Overlap4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): WhiB6 (whiB6).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.31 (95% CI -0.47 to 4.14). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.195 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=9 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3906 · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML0048c · 55.9% identity
M. marinum MMAR_5451 · 56.2% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_0067 · 67.6% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_003992 · 99.8% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WJC5 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameESX-1 secretion-associated protein EspI
Curated functionRequired to repress ESX-1-mediated secretion under low ATP conditions. This function requires the ATP-binding motif.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category D Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
eggNOG descriptioninvolved in chromosome partitioning
Orthologous groupCOG0455
Gene Ontology (29) GO:0002790, GO:0005575, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0006810, GO:0008104, GO:0008150, GO:0009306, GO:0009405, GO:0009987, GO:0015031, GO:0015833 +17 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.907 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 6 synonymous, 15 missense, 0 nonsense, 7 frameshift
Disruption 7 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 5.97% of strains (8517) · convergent
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — L6, L_1; union over all sites: 18 060 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:4354403:AG:A · frameshift · 8 517 strains — fixed in 6 sub-clades of L_1, totalling 1 395 strains — 35.9% of the 3 891 strains in the lineage named (largest: L_1.B.1.1.1.1 730/731, L_1.B 221/230, L_1.B.1.1.1.2 203/204, L_1.B.1.2 196/197, L_1.B.1.1.2 27/28, L_1.B.1 5/5)
  • NC_000962.3:4354461:T:TA · frameshift · 8 430 strains — fixed in 6 sub-clades of L_1, totalling 1 395 strains — 35.9% of the 3 891 strains in the lineage named (largest: L_1.B.1.1.1.1 725/731, L_1.B 221/230, L_1.B.1.1.1.2 202/204, L_1.B.1.2 196/197, L_1.B.1.1.2 28/28, L_1.B.1 5/5)
  • NC_000962.3:4353461:GC:G · frameshift · 372 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:4353663:G:GC · frameshift · 206 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:4353037:GGCCGCACGAAGGTATGGAA:G · frameshift · 185 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:4353305:A:AC · frameshift · 180 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:4353595:CAATCGGCG:C · frameshift · 170 strains — fixed in 12 sub-clades of L6, totalling 213 strains — 14.6% of the 1 457 strains in the lineage named (largest: L6.1.2.1.2.2.2.2 38/50, L6.1.2.2.2.2 23/36, L6.1.2.2.2.3.2 16/31, L6.1.2.1.1.2 17/22, L6.1.2.1.2.2.1 12/14, L6.1.2.2.1.2 9/11, …)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.545 (low power) · 5 consensus substitution(s)
low power (5 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 61.7% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 6/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 38.1%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RD1das 100% Dassie n=4, not statistical, Suricattae n=1, not statistical
RD1mic 76% Microti
RD1mon 34% Microti, Mungi n=1, not statistical, Dassie n=4, not statistical, Suricattae n=1, not statistical

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 25 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 25 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 186.44. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 25 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -3.290.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -3.110.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -3.050.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -3.020.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.990.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.950.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.820.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.800.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.780.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.750.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.720.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.720.0 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 70 significant condition(s) — the table lists the 12 strongest by |log2FC|, not all 70 (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 12 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance157.0 ppm · rank 994/3519 (71.8th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length666 aa
Molecular weight70.6 kDa
Theoretical pI9.72
GRAVY-0.615 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index66.1
Aromaticity0.041
Instability index66.5 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
CbiAPF01656.30 2.6e-10419–602 CobQ/CobB/MinD/ParA nucleotide binding domain
AAA_31PF13614.13 1.1e-07419–505 AAA domain
ArsA_ATPasePF02374.22 1.6e-05419–476 Anion-transporting ATPase

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 65.7, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)esxA (+ strand, 113 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)eccD1 (+ strand, -4 bp gap)
Predicted operon espI · eccD1

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: espI · eccD1 — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3990) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv3876 · Rv3877 · Rv3878 (coverage 98.37)
stationary phase: operon of 3, Rv3876 · Rv3877 · Rv3878 (coverage 81.65) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) Rv0023 (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: eccD1 (ESX-1 secretion system protein EccD1), high confidence (score 988, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 39 partners at medium confidence (15 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. Of the 39 partners, 1 rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3877 eccD1 ESX-1 secretion system protein EccD1 997 988 ctx neighborhood:881 cooccurence:524 coexpression:798 textmining:808
Rv3864 espE ESX-1 secretion-associated protein EspE 941 884 ctx cooccurence:436 coexpression:774 textmining:518
Rv3878 espJ ESX-1 secretion-associated protein EspJ 963 824 ctx neighborhood:748 textmining:803
Rv3875 esxA ESAT-6 protein EsxA 954 754 ctx neighborhood:592 textmining:822
Rv3874 esxB measured in Mtb ESAT-6-like protein EsxB 939 707 ctx neighborhood:509 textmining:803
Rv3873 PPE68 PPE family protein PPE68 811 627 coexpression:449 textmining:515
Rv3869 eccB1 ESX-1 secretion system protein EccB 835 567 ctx cooccurence:441 textmining:635
Rv3879c espK ESX-1 secretion-associated protein EspK 908 538 ctx cooccurence:528 textmining:810
Rv2542 hypothetical protein 690 537 ctx cooccurence:536
Rv3870 eccCa1 ESX-1 secretion system protein EccCa 746 521 ctx cooccurence:402 textmining:493
Rv3871 eccCb1 ESX-1 secretion system protein EccCb 902 505 textmining:811
Rv3866 espG1 ESX-1 secretion-associated protein EspG 703 500 coexpression:404 textmining:431
Rv3882c eccE1 ESX-1 secretion system protein EccE1 702 497 ctx cooccurence:475 textmining:433
Rv3883c mycP1 membrane-anchored mycosin 596 474 ctx cooccurence:461
Rv2608 PPE42 PPE family protein PPE42 469 470 ctx cooccurence:469

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: ESX-1 secretion-associated protein EspI
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: MinD/ParA family protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): CbiA PF01656.30 (E=2e-10), AAA_31 PF13614.13 (E=7e-08), ArsA_ATPase PF02374.22 (E=1e-05)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218393.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — CbiA (PF01656.30), AAA_31 (PF13614.13), ArsA_ATPase (PF02374.22)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0455
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WJC5 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 39 functional partner(s); context anchor eccD1
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_004110|Rv3876|espI
MAADYDKLFRPHEGMEAPDDMAAQPFFDPSASFPPAPASANLPKPNGQTPPPTSDDLSERFVSAPPPPPPPPPPPPPTPMPIAAGEPPSPEPAASKPPTPPMPIAGPEPAPPKPPTPPMPIAGPEPAPPKPPTPPMPIAGPAPTPTESQLAPPRPPTPQTPTGAPQQPESPAPHVPSHGPHQPRRTAPAPPWAKMPIGEPPPAPSRPSASPAEPPTRPAPQHSRRARRGHRYRTDTERNVGKVATGPSIQARLRAEEASGAQLAPGTEPSPAPLGQPRSYLAPPTRPAPTEPPPSPSPQRNSGRRAERRVHPDLAAQHAAAQPDSITAATTGGRRRKRAAPDLDATQKSLRPAAKGPKVKKVKPQKPKATKPPKVVSQRGWRHWVHALTRINLGLSPDEKYELDLHARVRRNPRGSYQIAVVGLKGGAGKTTLTAALGSTLAQVRADRILALDADPGAGNLADRVGRQSGATIADVLAEKELSHYNDIRAHTSVNAVNLEVLPAPEYSSAQRALSDADWHFIADPASRFYNLVLADCGAGFFDPLTRGVLSTVSGVVVVASVSIDGAQQASVALDWLRNNGYQDLASRACVVINHIMPGEPNVAVKDLVRHFEQQVQPGRVVVMPWDRHIAAGTEISLDLLDPIYKRKVLELAAALSDDFERAGRR