Rv3163c Still unknown · low

H37Rv Rv3163c · MTBC0 mtbc0_003362 · 423 aa · 3556490–3557761 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217679.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDUF58 domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Conserved hypothetical lipoprotein; DUF58 domain (PF01882) only, in an operon with moxR3 (Rv3164c, MoxR-family AAA+ ATPase) -- a DUF58/MoxR pairing documented across bacteria, though not itself established as functional here. Foldseek on the AlphaFold model returns one significant hit (human filamin complex-1, E=0.0081, TM=0.46); HHpred's top hit passes its own E-value bar (translocon-associated protein, E=0.00011) but is explicitly flagged as ISOLATED, with no thematic cohort -- the rest of its cascade is a large, thematically incoherent set of unrelated eukaryotic complexes. Neither search converges on a coherent functional hypothesis; the genomic context (moxR3 operon) is a more informative lead than either structural search, but is a text note, not a new finding of this review. Function remains unknown.
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Curation note: P51.2w (2026-09-23): the struct_af hit is weak and unconfirmed; HHpred's own note already flags it as non-convergent. Declared; genomic context (moxR3 operon) is noted as the more credible lead but is not itself new evidence produced by this review.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) no title/abstract mention

No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). A full-text search does however find 2 candidate paper(s) whose full text is not open access and could not be read here, so this page does not claim that the gene was never studied: the mention may be incidental or substantive. The gene remains dark on function.

Second-source check (tbmonitor): 0 paper(s) against 0 for the PubMed sweep — no mention in either source.

Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 0 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 0 — no mention in either source. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).

An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.

Integrative functional lead (multi-layer synthesis, hypothesis) 1 convergent handles

candidate component of the moxR3-associated regulatory operon, molecular role undetermined

Convergent evidenceoperon of 5 with moxR3 (Rv3164c, methanol-dehydrogenase-family transcriptional regulator) as the strongest STRING anchor in the whole gene's profile (combined score 919, neighborhood+cooccurence+coexpression) and TWO further named/family_assigned neighbours in the same operon (Rv3162c, Rv3166c)
Real-gene supportconservation quasi-invariant (pN/pS 0.503 underpowered, snp_sites=7/142601), MS-detected (6 datasets), predicted membrane lipoprotein. Regulated by moxR3 itself among others -- a plausible auto-regulatory feedback, not verified.
Adversarial checkSTRING anchor is the SAME fact as the operon (neighborhood/cooccurence/coexpression, none reaching the experimental/database bar), so this remains ONE handle regardless of the strength of the combined score. moxR3 itself is a transcriptional regulator of unclear physiological trigger in MTBC (methanol dehydrogenase systems are not established in this organism), so 'regulatory operon' is descriptive, not a resolved pathway. Kept as positional context only.

Synthesised across all evidence layers (conservation, operon, STRING, regulon, phenotype, localisation, structure, vulnerability) under an anti-oversell decision checklist. A functional hypothesis to validate, not an established function. P16.3j individual dossier cross-reference, 2026-08-03.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourRv3162c (Rv3162c, - strand)
Overlap4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Binding-pocket screen (P2Rank, geometric prediction) no confident pocket

Pockets found1 (best probability 0.035)
Model length screened423 aa

Read with care. This protein (423 aa) is above the size where the detector reliably differentiates proven enzymes (60.5% confident-pocket rate) from proteins annotated as non-catalytic (18.9%, i.e. 81.1% specificity; P16.3b calibration). Both rates are measured at the threshold this layer applies, best_probability >= 0.70, which is the best separation the detector reaches on that panel (Youden J = 0.416): even at its optimum it misses 39.5% of proven enzymes. 1 candidate pocket(s) were found but none reached confidence (best probability 0.035), which is consistent with a non-catalytic role, though it does not rule out a shallow or non-canonical binding site that this geometric detector misses. (Individual read at this confidence level; the GROUP-level dark-vs-non-catalytic contrast is NOT statistically significant at this size, p=0.285 -- read as modest evidence, not proof, cf. P16.3c.) P16.3e, calibration phase72b_pocket_calibration.py, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.06 (95% CI -2.42 to 4.03). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.233 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=11 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3188c · 99.8% identity
M. marinum MMAR_1400 · 79.3% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_3867 · 63.1% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_003261 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_1908c · 54.0% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O53313 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt namePossible conserved secreted protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionProtein of unknown function DUF58
Orthologous groupCOG1721

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.503 · quasi-invariant (7 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 3 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.757 (low power) · 3 consensus substitution(s)
low power (3 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 49/53 (92%) · mean identity 77.8% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 49/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 4/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 49.0%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 15 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 15 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.867, mean read count 121.538461538. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 15 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 6 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance2.64 ppm · rank 3110/3519 (11.7th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) lipoprotein

Predictionpredicted lipoprotein (lipobox + signal peptide)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)2
Lipoboxsignal-peptidase-II lipobox; lipidated Cys near position 23

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length423 aa
Molecular weight45.8 kDa
Theoretical pI9.92
GRAVY0.099 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index102.4
Aromaticity0.054
Instability index41.9 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DUF58PF01882.26 2.8e-18193–357 Protein of unknown function DUF58

HHpred profile-profile (no confident hit): No confident hit overall: the top hit passes the E-value bar (0.00011) but is ISOLATED (no thematic cohort at that significance) while the rest of the cascade is a large, thematically incoherent eukaryotic-complex/repeat-protein cluster including a de novo design template -- the alpha-solenoid/HEAT-Armadillo-repeat promiscuity signature (KB catalogue). The isolated translocon-associated-protein hit is recorded as a low-confidence lead, not asserted. Remains dark. top hits 8BF9_B translocon-associated protein, isolated significant hit (98.2%, E=0.00011), cluster of eukaryotic-complex hits: general transcription factor (x4-5), BRISC/BRCA1-A complex, 26S proteasome non-ATPase, collagen VI, magnesium-chelatase, anthrax toxin receptor (95.2-97.1%, E>=0.026), 2LTA_A de novo designed protein (96.7%, E=0.031). Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 85.6, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 85.6

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
7sc4-assembly2_B 0.94 0.46 0.14 0.46 17% 25% / 85% 8.1e-03 sig 7sc4-assembly2_B filamin complex-1
1qz1-assembly1_A-2 0.72 0.27 0.16 0.22 12% 41% / 72% 2.8e-03 sig 1qz1-assembly1_A-2 Crystal Structure of the Ig 1-2-3 fragment of NCAM

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 85.6, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 5

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv3162c (- strand, -4 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)moxR3 (- strand, 29 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv3162c · Rv3163c · moxR3 · Rv3165c · Rv3166c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3252) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (5 TF) Rv0081 (activates) · Rv1353c (activates) · cmtR (activates) · Rv2887 (represses) · moxR3 (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv3166c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 962, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 26 partners at medium confidence (4 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 26 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3166c hypothetical protein 961 962 ctx neighborhood:841 cooccurence:769
Rv3164c moxR3 methanol dehydrogenase transcriptional regulator MoxR 923 919 ctx neighborhood:841 cooccurence:402
Rv3162c integral membrane protein 882 882 ctx neighborhood:882
Rv3165c dark hypothetical protein 841 841 ctx neighborhood:841
Rv3099c hypothetical protein 661 661 ctx cooccurence:661
Rv2423 hypothetical protein 635 635 ctx cooccurence:635
Rv3435c transmembrane protein 581 581 ctx cooccurence:581
Rv3161c dioxygenase 580 580 ctx neighborhood:580
Rv3160c TetR family transcriptional regulator 575 576 ctx neighborhood:576
Rv0048c membrane protein 565 565 ctx cooccurence:561
Rv3847 hypothetical protein 556 556 ctx cooccurence:556
Rv3899c hypothetical protein 519 519 ctx cooccurence:519
Rv2525c hypothetical protein 502 502 ctx cooccurence:501
Rv3167c TetR family transcriptional regulator 497 497 ctx neighborhood:497
Rv3843c transmembrane protein 489 489 ctx cooccurence:489

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF58 domain-containing protein (PF01882.26, E=2.8e-18, 193-357/423 aa)
  • Genomic context: 5-gene operon, immediate neighbour moxR3/Rv3164c (MoxR-family AAA+ ATPase) -- DUF58 is a documented MoxR-associated domain across bacteria
  • Foldseek on the AlphaFold model (mean pLDDT 85.6): 1/8 hits significant (human filamin complex-1, E=0.0081, TM=0.46)
  • HHpred: top hit significant but isolated (no thematic cohort); remaining cascade thematically incoherent (eukaryotic-complex grab-bag)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217679.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF58 (PF01882.26)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1721
  • Curated reference: UniProt O53313 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 85.6)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 26 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv3166c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide; (myco)bacterial lipobox (Sutcliffe & Harrington 2004, doi:10.1099/mic.0.26804-0)
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_003362|Rv3163c|
MIQTCEVELRWRASQLTLAIATCAGVALAAAVVAGRWQLIAFAAPLLGVLCSISWQRPVPVIQVHGDPDSQRCFENEHVRVTVWVTTESVDAAVELTVSALAGMQFEALESVSRRTTTVSAVAQRWGRYPIRARVAVVARGGLLMGAGTVDAAEIVVFPLTPPQSTPLPQTELLDRLGAHLTRHVGPGVEYADIRPYVPGDQLRAVNWVVSARRGRLHVTRRLTDRAADVVVLIDMYRQPAGPATEATERVVRGAAQVVQTALRNGDRAGIVALGGNRPRWLGADIGQRQFYRVLDTVLGAGEGFENTTGTLAPRAAVPAGAVVIAFSTLLDTEFALALIDLRKRGHVVVAVDVLDSCPLQDQLDPLVVRMWALQRSAMYRDMATIGVDVLSWPADHSLQQSMGALPNRRRRGRGRASRARLP