Rv3163c Still unknown · low
H37Rv Rv3163c · MTBC0 mtbc0_003362 ·
423 aa ·
3556490–3557761 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_217679.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | DUF58 domain-containing protein |
| Revised (this work) | Conserved hypothetical lipoprotein; DUF58 domain (PF01882) only, in an operon with moxR3 (Rv3164c, MoxR-family AAA+ ATPase) -- a DUF58/MoxR pairing documented across bacteria, though not itself established as functional here. Foldseek on the AlphaFold model returns one significant hit (human filamin complex-1, E=0.0081, TM=0.46); HHpred's top hit passes its own E-value bar (translocon-associated protein, E=0.00011) but is explicitly flagged as ISOLATED, with no thematic cohort -- the rest of its cascade is a large, thematically incoherent set of unrelated eukaryotic complexes. Neither search converges on a coherent functional hypothesis; the genomic context (moxR3 operon) is a more informative lead than either structural search, but is a text note, not a new finding of this review. Function remains unknown. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Curation note: P51.2w (2026-09-23): the struct_af hit is weak and unconfirmed; HHpred's own note already flags it as non-convergent. Declared; genomic context (moxR3 operon) is noted as the more credible lead but is not itself new evidence produced by this review.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) no title/abstract mention
No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). A full-text search does however find 2 candidate paper(s) whose full text is not open access and could not be read here, so this page does not claim that the gene was never studied: the mention may be incidental or substantive. The gene remains dark on function.
Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 0 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 0 — no mention in either source. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Integrative functional lead (multi-layer synthesis, hypothesis) 1 convergent handles
candidate component of the moxR3-associated regulatory operon, molecular role undetermined
| Convergent evidence | operon of 5 with moxR3 (Rv3164c, methanol-dehydrogenase-family transcriptional regulator) as the strongest STRING anchor in the whole gene's profile (combined score 919, neighborhood+cooccurence+coexpression) and TWO further named/family_assigned neighbours in the same operon (Rv3162c, Rv3166c) |
|---|---|
| Real-gene support | conservation quasi-invariant (pN/pS 0.503 underpowered, snp_sites=7/142601), MS-detected (6 datasets), predicted membrane lipoprotein. Regulated by moxR3 itself among others -- a plausible auto-regulatory feedback, not verified. |
| Adversarial check | STRING anchor is the SAME fact as the operon (neighborhood/cooccurence/coexpression, none reaching the experimental/database bar), so this remains ONE handle regardless of the strength of the combined score. moxR3 itself is a transcriptional regulator of unclear physiological trigger in MTBC (methanol dehydrogenase systems are not established in this organism), so 'regulatory operon' is descriptive, not a resolved pathway. Kept as positional context only. |
Synthesised across all evidence layers (conservation, operon, STRING, regulon, phenotype, localisation, structure, vulnerability) under an anti-oversell decision checklist. A functional hypothesis to validate, not an established function. P16.3j individual dossier cross-reference, 2026-08-03.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv3162c (Rv3162c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Binding-pocket screen (P2Rank, geometric prediction) no confident pocket
| Pockets found | 1 (best probability 0.035) |
|---|---|
| Model length screened | 423 aa |
Read with care. This protein (423 aa) is above the size where the detector reliably differentiates proven enzymes (60.5% confident-pocket rate) from proteins annotated as non-catalytic (18.9%, i.e. 81.1% specificity; P16.3b calibration). Both rates are measured at the threshold this layer applies, best_probability >= 0.70, which is the best separation the detector reaches on that panel (Youden J = 0.416): even at its optimum it misses 39.5% of proven enzymes. 1 candidate pocket(s) were found but none reached confidence (best probability 0.035), which is consistent with a non-catalytic role, though it does not rule out a shallow or non-canonical binding site that this geometric detector misses. (Individual read at this confidence level; the GROUP-level dark-vs-non-catalytic contrast is NOT statistically significant at this size, p=0.285 -- read as modest evidence, not proof, cf. P16.3c.) P16.3e, calibration phase72b_pocket_calibration.py, 2026-08-03.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.06 (95% CI -2.42 to 4.03). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.233 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=11 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb3188c
· 99.8% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_1400
· 79.3% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_3867
· 63.1% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_003261
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_1908c
· 54.0% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O53313
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Predicted
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Possible conserved secreted protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | Protein of unknown function DUF58 |
| Orthologous group | COG1721 |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.503 · quasi-invariant (7 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 3 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.757 (low power)
· 3 consensus substitution(s) low power (3 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 49/53 (92%) · mean identity 77.8%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 49/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 4/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 49.0% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
15 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
15 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.867,
mean read count 121.538461538.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 15 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 6 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 2.64 ppm · rank 3110/3519 (11.7th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) lipoprotein
| Prediction | predicted lipoprotein (lipobox + signal peptide) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 2 |
| Lipobox | signal-peptidase-II lipobox; lipidated Cys near position 23 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 423 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 45.8 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 9.92 |
| GRAVY | 0.099 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 102.4 |
| Aromaticity | 0.054 |
| Instability index | 41.9 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUF58 | PF01882.26 | 2.8e-18 | 193–357 | Protein of unknown function DUF58 |
HHpred profile-profile (no confident hit): No confident hit overall: the top hit passes the E-value bar (0.00011) but is ISOLATED (no thematic cohort at that significance) while the rest of the cascade is a large, thematically incoherent eukaryotic-complex/repeat-protein cluster including a de novo design template -- the alpha-solenoid/HEAT-Armadillo-repeat promiscuity signature (KB catalogue). The isolated translocon-associated-protein hit is recorded as a low-confidence lead, not asserted. Remains dark.
top hits 8BF9_B translocon-associated protein, isolated significant hit (98.2%, E=0.00011), cluster of eukaryotic-complex hits: general transcription factor (x4-5), BRISC/BRCA1-A complex, 26S proteasome non-ATPase, collagen VI, magnesium-chelatase, anthrax toxin receptor (95.2-97.1%, E>=0.026), 2LTA_A de novo designed protein (96.7%, E=0.031).
Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 85.6, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 85.6
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7sc4-assembly2_B |
0.94 | 0.46 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 17% | 25% / 85% | 8.1e-03 sig | 7sc4-assembly2_B filamin complex-1 |
1qz1-assembly1_A-2 |
0.72 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 12% | 41% / 72% | 2.8e-03 sig | 1qz1-assembly1_A-2 Crystal Structure of the Ig 1-2-3 fragment of NCAM |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 85.6, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 5
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv3162c (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | moxR3 (- strand, 29 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv3162c · Rv3163c · moxR3 · Rv3165c · Rv3166c
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3252) |
not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase) |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (5 TF) |
Rv0081 (activates) · Rv1353c (activates) · cmtR (activates) · Rv2887 (represses) · moxR3 (activates)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv3166c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 962, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 26 partners at medium confidence (4 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 26 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv3166c |
hypothetical protein | 961 | 962 ctx | neighborhood:841 cooccurence:769 |
Rv3164c moxR3 |
methanol dehydrogenase transcriptional regulator MoxR | 923 | 919 ctx | neighborhood:841 cooccurence:402 |
Rv3162c |
integral membrane protein | 882 | 882 ctx | neighborhood:882 |
Rv3165c dark |
hypothetical protein | 841 | 841 ctx | neighborhood:841 |
Rv3099c |
hypothetical protein | 661 | 661 ctx | cooccurence:661 |
Rv2423 |
hypothetical protein | 635 | 635 ctx | cooccurence:635 |
Rv3435c |
transmembrane protein | 581 | 581 ctx | cooccurence:581 |
Rv3161c |
dioxygenase | 580 | 580 ctx | neighborhood:580 |
Rv3160c |
TetR family transcriptional regulator | 575 | 576 ctx | neighborhood:576 |
Rv0048c |
membrane protein | 565 | 565 ctx | cooccurence:561 |
Rv3847 |
hypothetical protein | 556 | 556 ctx | cooccurence:556 |
Rv3899c |
hypothetical protein | 519 | 519 ctx | cooccurence:519 |
Rv2525c |
hypothetical protein | 502 | 502 ctx | cooccurence:501 |
Rv3167c |
TetR family transcriptional regulator | 497 | 497 ctx | neighborhood:497 |
Rv3843c |
transmembrane protein | 489 | 489 ctx | cooccurence:489 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF58 domain-containing protein (PF01882.26, E=2.8e-18, 193-357/423 aa)
- Genomic context: 5-gene operon, immediate neighbour moxR3/Rv3164c (MoxR-family AAA+ ATPase) -- DUF58 is a documented MoxR-associated domain across bacteria
- Foldseek on the AlphaFold model (mean pLDDT 85.6): 1/8 hits significant (human filamin complex-1, E=0.0081, TM=0.46)
- HHpred: top hit significant but isolated (no thematic cohort); remaining cascade thematically incoherent (eukaryotic-complex grab-bag)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217679.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF58 (PF01882.26)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG1721 - Curated reference: UniProt O53313 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 85.6)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
26 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv3166c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide; (myco)bacterial lipobox (Sutcliffe & Harrington 2004, doi:10.1099/mic.0.26804-0)
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_003362|Rv3163c| MIQTCEVELRWRASQLTLAIATCAGVALAAAVVAGRWQLIAFAAPLLGVLCSISWQRPVPVIQVHGDPDSQRCFENEHVRVTVWVTTESVDAAVELTVSALAGMQFEALESVSRRTTTVSAVAQRWGRYPIRARVAVVARGGLLMGAGTVDAAEIVVFPLTPPQSTPLPQTELLDRLGAHLTRHVGPGVEYADIRPYVPGDQLRAVNWVVSARRGRLHVTRRLTDRAADVVVLIDMYRQPAGPATEATERVVRGAAQVVQTALRNGDRAGIVALGGNRPRWLGADIGQRQFYRVLDTVLGAGEGFENTTGTLAPRAAVPAGAVVIAFSTLLDTEFALALIDLRKRGHVVVAVDVLDSCPLQDQLDPLVVRMWALQRSAMYRDMATIGVDVLSWPADHSLQQSMGALPNRRRRGRGRASRARLP
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv3163c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv3163c