Rv2569c Resolved · high

H37Rv Rv2569c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002736 · 314 aa · 2917008–2917952 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217085.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationtransglutaminase family protein
Revised (this work)Transglutaminase-family cysteine protease (COG1305; Pfam Bact_transglu_N PF08379.16, Transglut_core PF01841.26), cleaves host E-cadherin to disrupt the epithelial barrier and promote transmission (Zang et al. 2024, PLoS Pathog), and a Mycobacterium marinum ortholog locus affects macrophage interaction (El-Etr et al. 2004, Infect Immun). Catalytic Cys196-His239-Asp259 triad independently confirmed on this atlas's own AlphaFold model (data/af_models/Rv2569c.pdb): Cys196 SG-His239 ND1 3.69 A, His239 NE2-Asp259 OD2 2.74 A, region at pLDDT 95.3-97.9, Foldseek-matched to human coagulation Factor XIII / M-CSA 149 (EC 2.3.2.13, PDB 1ggt, catalytic triad Cys315-His374-Asp397 confirmed against the M-CSA API). This rules out the 'serine protease' label used in the primary literature (Zang et al. 2024 title): the catalytic nucleophile is a cysteine, not a serine, consistent with the transglutaminase-superfamily fold this atlas already assigned by Pfam.
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Curation note: 2026-08-31 (mtbc/Rv2566 project, litterature_review --wide back-propagation, destination C1). Valas & Bourne 2008 (J Mol Evol 66(5):494-504) identify this gene's Pfam/COG1305 domain family as 'a transglutaminase-like protein' and show a genome-wide statistical association between COG1305 domain count and the presence of an alternative bacterial proteasome (Anbu or 20S; the MTBC has the 20S): p=2.27e-08 / p=3.42e-07, replicated in proteobacteria (p=0.0045). This is a FAMILY-LEVEL claim (applies to the shared Transglut_core/COG1305 fold) and is added here for that reason. Iyer et al. 2008's more specific architectural prediction (fusion to a C-terminal carboxylate-amine/ammonia ligase domain, GS-fold/ATP-grasp) is NOT carried over to this gene: cross-checked against this atlas's own Pfam calls (mtbc/Rv2566 project P9.3), only Rv2566 among the 5 H37Rv COG1305 paralogues carries the C-terminal DUF2126 extension Iyer's example describes -- this gene is Transglut_core-only. The proteostasis-coupling hypothesis (Anbu/proteasome) has only been network-tested for Rv2566 itself (mtbc/Rv2566 P5.2, negative at the local MTBC STRING level); it has NOT been tested for this paralogue and should not be assumed to transfer without a separate check. `verdict`/`confidence` left unchanged (family_assigned/medium). 2026-09-15 (P47.2 + P47.6, signalement inter-sessions du projet mtbc/Rv2569c, verifie ici avant ecriture, pas recopie). Barre de requalification franchie : deux appuis litterature independants (El-Etr et al. 2004, M. marinum ; Zang et al. 2024/2025, MEME groupe, compte pour un seul appui -- caveat du pair applique) PLUS une troisieme ligne de preuve, structurale, methodologiquement distincte : le Foldseek du pair vers le Facteur XIII humain (M-CSA 149, PDB 1ggt) et sa triade Cys196-His239-Asp259 mesuree sur le modele AlphaFold ont ete VERIFIES ici de maniere independante (distances recalculees sur data/af_models/Rv2569c.pdb, entree M-CSA 149 relue via l'API -- pas de chiffre recopie sans controle). Verdict family_assigned/medium -> requalified/high. Le produit propose par Zang et al. ('serine protease') est corrige en 'cysteine protease de la famille transglutaminase' : la triade catalytique verifiee est Cys-His-Asp (nucleophile cysteine), pas Ser-His-Asp -- une erreur de nomenclature mecanistique dans le titre de la publication primaire, sans consequence sur ses resultats experimentaux (clivage de l'E-cadherine, barriere epitheliale, transmission), qui restent la base du verdict fonctionnel. Le locus mel1 (P47.4) et le compte de litterature (P47.3) restent ouverts, non traites par cette note.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 3 publications

Found under: H37Rv (3).

3 TB publications mention this gene. 3 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

Named in the body of 5 paper(s), though in no title or abstract. Searched as Rv2569c in Europe PMC full text (2026-09-15).

A full-text hit means the gene is NAMED in the body of a paper -- very often as a citation of the Zang et al. findings, or (El-Etr et al. 2004) as the primary functional study that first tested this gene, under its M. marinum name melE, before it had an H37Rv locus tag in the literature. This field lists ONLY the hits absent from the title/abstract count above (literature.n_papers); it does not duplicate them. A hit is not itself a characterisation -- read it before concluding anything. Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions. A hit whose full text is not open access is counted in n_unverifiable, not listed: the API cannot read it, so it is neither a proof of mention nor a proof of absence.

PublicationDate
The NLRP3 inflammasome in tuberculosis and its regulatory mechanisms. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2026.112572 2026
Serine protease Rv2569c inhibits inflammatory response and promotes intracellular survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting the RhoG-NF-κB-NLRP3 pathway. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143022 2025
Serine protease Rv2569c facilitates transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis via disrupting the epithelial barrier by cleaving E-cadherin. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012214 2024
3 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2569c, Mb2599c, ML0508, MMAR_2162, MSMEG_3018, MAB_2857c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
The NLRP3 inflammasome in tuberculosis and its regulatory mechanisms. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2026.112572 Cell Signal 2026
Serine protease Rv2569c inhibits inflammatory response and promotes intracellular survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting the RhoG-NF-κB-NLRP3 pathway. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143022 names it Int J Biol Macromol 2025
Serine protease Rv2569c facilitates transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis via disrupting the epithelial barrier by cleaving E-cadherin. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012214 names it PLoS Pathog 2024

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder26% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 91.3
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 83 aa [0-83]

carries a substantial disordered region (83/314 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 8.0

disruption confers tolerance to Isoniazid; mixed in vivo signal: required in 1 of 9 significant measurements, disruption advantageous in 8 — the data supports no single direction; required under acid stress in phosphate-citrate buffer; altered fitness on cholesterol (lipid catabolism).

Corroborating evidenceconserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; structural lead available

This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene

NeighbourRv2568c (Rv2568c, - strand)
Overlap8 bp, 1 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Post-translational modifications

1 reported modified residue(s): N-acetylserine @2.

Experimentally reported post-translational modification(s). A phosphosite indicates the protein is expressed and is a substrate of the M. tuberculosis Ser/Thr/Tyr kinase signalling network — a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: UniProt (Modified residue features; PTM sites curated from the M. tuberculosis literature).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -0.32 (95% CI -2.56 to 2.73). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.282 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=12 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (COG category). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2599c · 99.7% identity
M. leprae ML0508 · 84.4% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2162 · 85.4% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_3018 · 77.4% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002660 · 99.7% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2857c · 64.1% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WL93 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv2569c

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv2569c; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category E Amino acid transport and metabolism
eggNOG descriptiontransglutaminase-like
Orthologous groupCOG1305
Gene Ontology (6) GO:0005575, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0016020, GO:0044464, GO:0071944

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.355 · quasi-invariant (6 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 3 synonymous, 3 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 50/53 (94%) · mean identity 84.3% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 50/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 4/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 60.0%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 23 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 23 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.957, mean read count 69.7727272727. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 23 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -3.690.0 required
altered fitness under acid stress in phosphate-citrate buffer (stress) -2.690.0 required
fitness on cholesterol (vs glycerol) (carbon source) -2.210.035 required
differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) +1.950.0 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.930.0 disruption advantageous
altered fitness under Isoniazid (drug exposure) +1.640.0094 disruption advantageous
altered fitness under Isoniazid (drug exposure) +1.610.02 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.600.0 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.550.0056 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.550.0 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.520.0 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.480.0055 disruption advantageous

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 16 significant condition(s) — the table lists the 12 strongest by |log2FC|, not all 16 (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 13 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance67.5 ppm · rank 1559/3519 (55.7th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Localisation (measured + predicted) experimentally localised

A targeted experiment places this protein in the cell envelope, not in the cytoplasm
Measured localisationcell wall (predominant), surface-exposed; the authors conclude the protein is extracellular in H37Rv
Method
  • subcellular fractionation of H37Rv (whole lysate, cell wall, cell membrane, cytoplasm, culture filtrate) probed by western blot with a polyclonal antibody raised against the purified protein; Ag85B as the marker protein
  • immunoelectron microscopy on ultrathin H37Rv sections, pre-immune serum as the negative control, which places the protein at the cell surface
Against the predictionthe prediction below is not contradicted: it reports topology and signal peptide, not a compartment

Two targeted experiments on this protein locate it outside the cytoplasm: subcellular fractionation of H37Rv probed with an antibody raised against the protein reports it predominantly in the cell-wall fraction, and immunoelectron microscopy on ultrathin sections shows it at the cell surface. Read that against the prediction on this page rather than instead of it: DeepTMHMM finds no transmembrane helix and no Sec/Tat signal peptide, and those two statements are compatible with an extracellular protein in this organism — the canonical ESX substrates EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 are called GLOB by this very layer and are secreted. The export route of this protein is not established; the measurement says where the protein is, not how it got there.

Limits of this measurement. The fractionation blot reports only Ag85B, itself a wall-associated and secreted marker; no cytoplasmic marker (RpoB, GroEL2) is shown, and that is the control which decides whether a wall fraction is clean (this atlas measured, in P5.1b, that two published fractionated proteomes fail it). The cell-wall/cytoplasm partition therefore rests on a blot without a contamination control; the surface localisation rests on the immunoelectron microscopy, which does not depend on fraction purity. The band intensities of the fractionation figure were not re-read here: the compartment wording follows the authors' own statement ('predominantly localized on the cell wall'), not a re-quantification. The same paper's title calls the protein a serine protease on the strength of an inhibitor profile alone, with no numbered catalytic residue; that claim is NOT carried over by this field, which reports localisation only.

Source: Zang et al. 2024, PLoS Pathog 20(5):e1012214 (PMID 38722857), full text read 2026-09-12; reported to this project by the mtbc/Rv2569c session (P47.1).

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length314 aa
Molecular weight34.4 kDa
Theoretical pI5.65
GRAVY-0.276 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index82.9
Aromaticity0.086
Instability index37.4 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Bact_transglu_NPF08379.16 2.0e-2517–96 Bacterial transglutaminase-like N-terminal region
Transglut_corePF01841.26 2.6e-14157–260 Transglutaminase-like superfamily

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 91.3, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 91.3

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
3isr-assembly1_B 1.00 0.70 0.65 0.70 19% 95% / 95% 1.3e-19 sig 3isr-assembly1_B The Crystal Structure of a Putative Cysteine Protease from Cytophaga hutchinsonii to 1.9A
9crn-assembly1_A 1.00 0.40 0.24 0.21 14% 57% / 36% 1.8e-05 sig 9crn-assembly1_A Crystal structure of Streptococcus pyogenes TglA
8j07-assembly1_7 1.00 0.41 0.26 0.14 12% 35% / 32% 1.6e-04 sig 8j07-assembly1_7 96nm repeat of human respiratory doublet microtubule and associated axonemal complexes
8oxx-assembly1_A 0.97 0.27 0.27 0.19 13% 75% / 71% 2.7e-05 sig 8oxx-assembly1_A Transglutaminase 3 in complex with inhibitor Z-don and DH patient-derived Fab DH63-B02
7ob6-assembly1_A 0.96 0.41 0.25 0.33 10% 53% / 60% 2.5e-03 sig 7ob6-assembly1_A CPR-C4 - a conserved novel protease from the Candidate Phyla Radiation

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 91.3, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2568c (- strand, -8 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2570 (+ strand, 103 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2568c · Rv2569c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2645) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv2568c · Rv2569c (coverage 12.56)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Named locus (published gene set, not an operon) mel1

Defined inMycobacterium marinum, gene symbol melE for this locus
Members melA · melB · melC · melD · melE (this gene)

El-Etr, Subbian, Cirillo & Cirillo 2004 (Infect Immun 72(12):6902-6913, PMID 15557611, PMC529147) identified the mel1 cosmid region in M. marinum by a gain-of-function screen (cosmid library transformed into M. smegmatis, screened for enhanced macrophage association) and then pinpointed melE by transposon mutagenesis (Tn22) and allelic exchange: the M. marinum melE mutant is defective for cell association with the murine (J774A.1) and fish (CLC) macrophage cell lines, and this defect is complemented by expressing the M. tuberculosis Rv2569c gene itself from the hsp60 promoter (construct pJDC77). melA, melB, melC and melD were annotated ONLY by sequence homology to their M. tuberculosis counterparts (Table 1 of the paper) and were NEVER individually mutated or tested in this study -- the direct functional evidence in mel1 concerns melE/Rv2569c alone.

'mel1' names a conserved gene SET (near-identical order across M. marinum and the MTBC, per the source paper), not a demonstrated operon: El-Etr et al. 2004 measured neither a shared transcript nor co-expression. A single five-gene transcription unit is not even geometrically possible in H37Rv: melC (Rv2567) sits on the '+' strand while melD (Rv2568c) and melE (Rv2569c, this gene) sit on the '-' strand. Only melD-melE are adjacent and co-directional (8 bp gap), which the co-directional heuristic above already captures as a 2-gene predicted operon -- and Roback et al. 2007 (published_operon_evidence, above) assigns that specific pair a LOW probability (0.011) and flags disagreement with the heuristic. melA (Rv2560) is not even adjacent to melB (Rv2566) in H37Rv: five unrelated ORFs intervene (Rv2561-Rv2565, including a glutamine ABC transporter).

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) Rv1990c (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2568c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 952, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 7 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2568c hypothetical protein 952 952 ctx neighborhood:882 cooccurence:569
Rv2567 hypothetical protein 914 907 ctx neighborhood:544 cooccurence:774
Rv2411c hypothetical protein 807 801 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv2410c hypothetical protein 797 789 ctx cooccurence:773
Rv2570 hypothetical protein 656 656 ctx neighborhood:655
Rv2566 paralog hypothetical protein 504 505
Rv1673c hypothetical protein 405 406 ctx cooccurence:404

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: transglutaminase family protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Bact_transglu_N PF08379.16 (E=2e-25), Transglut_core PF01841.26 (E=3e-14)
  • (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)
  • P9.3 back-propagation (mtbc/Rv2566 project, litterature_review --wide, 2026-08-31): Valas & Bourne 2008 (J Mol Evol) identify the COG1305 domain family shared by this gene as 'a transglutaminase-like protein' and show a genome-wide statistical association between COG1305 domain count and the presence of an alternative bacterial proteasome (Anbu or 20S; p=2.27e-08 / p=3.42e-07, replicated in proteobacteria p=0.0045). Family-level claim; this gene is Transglut_core-only (no C-terminal DUF2126 ligase extension, unlike Rv2566), so Iyer et al. 2008's more specific fusion-architecture prediction is deliberately NOT extended to it here.
  • P47.6 (2026-09-15, signalement inter-sessions du projet mtbc/Rv2569c) : catalytic triad Cys196-His239-Asp259 verified independently on this atlas's own AlphaFold model (data/af_models/Rv2569c.pdb) -- Cys196 SG-His239 ND1 3.69 A, His239 NE2-Asp259 OD2 2.74 A, pLDDT 95.3-97.9 -- matching the pair's report exactly. M-CSA 149 (EC 2.3.2.13, PDB 1ggt, human Factor XIII) independently confirms a Cys315-His374-Asp397 catalytic triad, ruling out the 'serine protease' label of Zang et al. 2024/2025 (same group, one support) for this cysteine-nucleophile transglutaminase-family enzyme. El-Etr et al. 2004 (M. marinum ortholog locus, macrophage-interaction phenotype) added as the second, independent literature support.

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217085.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Bact_transglu_N (PF08379.16), Transglut_core (PF01841.26)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1305
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WL93 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 91.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 7 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2568c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Measured localisation: Zang et al. 2024, PLoS Pathog 20(5):e1012214 (PMID 38722857), full text read 2026-09-12; reported to this project by the mtbc/Rv2569c session (P47.1). Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: Valas RE, Bourne PE (2008). Rethinking proteasome evolution: two novel bacterial proteasomes Journal of Molecular Evolution. doi:10.1007/s00239-008-9075-7 PMID:18389302
  • Primary literature: Zang X, Zhang J, Jiang Y, Feng T, Cui Y, Wang H, Cui Z, Dang G, Liu S (2024). Serine protease Rv2569c facilitates transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis via disrupting the epithelial barrier by cleaving E-cadherin PLoS Pathogens. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012214 PMID:38722857
  • Primary literature: El-Etr SH, Subbian S, Cirillo SL, Cirillo JD (2004). Identification of two Mycobacterium marinum loci that affect interactions with macrophages Infection and Immunity. doi:10.1128/IAI.72.12.6902-6913.2004 PMID:15557611

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002736|Rv2569c|
MSADSSLSLPLSGTHRYRVTHRTEYRYSDVVTSSYGRGFLTPRNSLRQRCVAHRLTIDPAPADRSTSRDGYGNISSYFHVTEPHRTLTITSDSIVDVSPPPPGLYTSGPALQPWEAARPAGLPGSLATEFTLDLNPPEITDAVREYAAPSFLPKRPLVEVLRDLASRIYTDFTYRSGSTTISTGVNEVLLAREGVCQDFARLAIACLRANGLAACYVSGYLATDPPPGKDRMIGIDATHAWASVWTPQQPGRFEWLGLDPTNDQLVDQRYIVVGRGRDYADVPPLRGIIYTNSENSVIDVSVDVVPFEGDALHA