Rv2566 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) never studied

No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.27 (95% CI -0.45 to 4.38). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, pebble.rockefeller.edu).

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (COG category). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 145 209 strains)

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Reproducible detection across several independent datasets (PaxDb) makes the existence claim robust; the integrated abundance places the protein in the proteome's dynamic range.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 89.0

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 89.0, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a strong physiological-context lead.

Node colour = verdict, dashed = hypothetical; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2565 (NTE family protein), high confidence from genomic context alone (score 773 excluding text-mining). This association is the citable seed of a function hypothesis for this hypothetical protein.

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The exp badge marks an experimentally-supported partner (measured interaction, experimental/database channel ≥400) as opposed to a purely predicted one — but note that the M. tuberculosis experimental interactome is dominated by a noisy bacterial-two-hybrid screen, so a strong measured link that contradicts the operon/localisation context is likely a false positive. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Evidence

• Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): hypothetical protein
• Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Bact_transglu_N PF08379.16 (E=1e-22), Transglut_core PF01841.26 (E=8e-16), DUF2126 PF09899.15 (E=0e+00)
• (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv2566|
MPLRPTQVSGTGRTRCAGRSGVISSAAMSIKVALEHRTSYTFDRLVRVYPHIVRLRPAPHSRTSIEAYSLRIEPADHFINWQQDALGNFLARLVFPNPMRQLRITVGLIADLKVINPFDFFIEDWAEIWPCAGMAYPKALADDLRPYLRPVDEDGDGSGPGELTQAWVRNFTVPDGTRTIDFLVALNRAINADVGYCVRMEPGVQTPDFTLRTGVGSCRDSAWLLVSILRQFGLAARFVSGYLVQLASDIEALDGPSGPAADFTDLHAWAEAYIPGAGWIGLDPTSGLLAGEGHIPLAATPHPASAAPISGGTDVCDTVLEFSNTVTRVHEDPRVTLPYTDESWKTICEVGQRVDERLAAADVRLTVGGEPTFVSVDNQVAEEWRTAADGPHKRERASDLAARLKAVWAPQGLIHRGQGRWYPGEPLPRWQIALYWRTDGRPLWTNDALLADPWGAPPADPVDDDAAYRVLAGIADGLGLPISQVRPAYEDPLSRLAAAVRMPAGDPVESGDDLGCDTNPDTPTGRAALLARLDEAITSPAAYVLPLHRRDDGQGWASANWRLRRGRIVLLEGDSPAGLRLPLDSISWRPPRASFDADPVAVRSTLPAELHTDRAVVEDPETAPTTALVAEVRGGLVHIFLPPTDALEHFIDLVARVEAAATTANCPVVIEGYGPPPDPRLTSTTITPDPGVIEVNIAPTASFAEQRQQLETLYQQARLARLTTEAFDVDGTHGGTGGGNHITLGGVTPADSPLLRRPDLLVSLLTYWQRHPSLSYLFAGRFVGTTSQAPRVDEGRAEALYELEIAFAEILRLSPSSGGGRPQPWVTDRALRHLLTDITGNTHRAEFCIDKLYSPDSARGRLGLLELRGFEMPPHLHMAMVQSLLVRSLVAWFWDQPLRAPLIRHGANLHGRYLLPHFLIHDIADVAADLRAHGIAFETSWLDPFTEFRFPRIGTAVFDGIEIELRGAIEPWHTLGEEATAAGTARYVDSSVERIQVRIIGADRHRYVVTCNGYPMPLLATDNPDIHVGGVRFKAWQPPSALHPTITVDGPLRFELIDIATATSCGGCTYHVAHPGGRAYDEPPVNAVEAEARRARRFEATGFTPGKLDLSDIREKQARISTDIGAPGILDLRRVRTVQQ