PPE25 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1787 · MTBC0 - · 365 aa · 2025301–2026398 H37Rv (+) · RefSeq YP_177833.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)PPE family protein PPE25
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)PPE family protein PPE25. Pfam: PPE (PF00823.26), PPE-SVP (PF12484.14).
Functional category (TubercuList)PE/PPE

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) studied as much outside M. tuberculosis

The biology of this gene is documented at least as much outside M. tuberculosis as within it — 5 record(s) in a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the verified sample: M. marinum 1, M. smegmatis 4) versus 5 in a TB context, two separate queries. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is “known” about this gene is known by proxy.

Caveat: IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge.

7 TB publications mention this gene. 7 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). **Its biology is documented at least as much OUTSIDE M. tuberculosis as within it**: queried separately, 5 records carry a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 5-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (4), M. marinum (1)) against 5 with a M. tuberculosis context. The context counts come from distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they are not parts of the total above and need not add up to it. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is 'known' about this gene is known by proxy. reformulation, not a quotation

5 of 7: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Deciphering the functional roles of PE18 and PPE26 proteins in modulating Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis and immune response. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1517822 2025
[The Role of PPE25 in Mycobacterial Infections of Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils]. 2018
DNA vaccine with discontinuous T-cell epitope insertions into HSP65 scaffold as a potential means to improve immunogenicity of multi-epitope Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine. doi:10.1111/1348-0421.12410 2016
Mycobacterium tuberculosis PPE25 and PPE26 proteins expressed in Mycobacterium smegmatis modulate cytokine secretion in mouse macrophages and enhance mycobacterial survival. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2016.06.004 2017
Disruption of the ESX-5 system of Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes loss of PPE protein secretion, reduction of cell wall integrity and strong attenuation. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08001.x 2012
7 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv1787, PPE25, Mb1815, MMAR_2669 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Deciphering the functional roles of PE18 and PPE26 proteins in modulating Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis and immune response. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1517822 Front Immunol 2025
[The Role of PPE25 in Mycobacterial Infections of Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils]. names it Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2018
Mycobacterium tuberculosis PPE25 and PPE26 proteins expressed in Mycobacterium smegmatis modulate cytokine secretion in mouse macrophages and enhance mycobacterial survival. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2016.06.004 names it Res Microbiol 2017
DNA vaccine with discontinuous T-cell epitope insertions into HSP65 scaffold as a potential means to improve immunogenicity of multi-epitope Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine. doi:10.1111/1348-0421.12410 Microbiol Immunol 2016
Disruption of the ESX-5 system of Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes loss of PPE protein secretion, reduction of cell wall integrity and strong attenuation. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08001.x Mol Microbiol 2012
The Mycobacterium avium ESX-5 PPE protein, PPE25-MAV, interacts with an ESAT-6 family Protein, MAV_2921, and localizes to the bacterial surface. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2012.01.004 names it Microb Pathog 2012
Virulence-related Mycobacterium avium subsp hominissuis MAV_2928 gene is associated with vacuole remodeling in macrophages. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-100 BMC Microbiol 2010

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder34% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 72.6
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 117 aa [248-365]

carries a substantial disordered region (117/365 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): Unc_7.

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.52 (95% CI -1.22 to 2.96). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.357 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1815 · 99.2% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2669 · 53.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001861 · 99.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WI13 SwissProt · reviewed · Inferred from homology
UniProt nameUncharacterized PPE family protein PPE25

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized PPE family protein PPE25; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category N Cell motility
eggNOG descriptionPolymorphic PE/PPE proteins C terminal
Orthologous groupCOG5651

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 1.481 · diversifying/relaxed
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 7 missense, 1 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.12% of strains (174) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) aucun site fixé dans un clade; union over all sites: 317 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:2025913:C:A · nonsense · 174 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:2025670:AT:A · frameshift · 143 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) undefined (dS = 0) (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 43/53 (81%) · mean identity 52.0% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 43/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callGA · growth-advantage
What the call meansgrowth-advantage: insertions enriched
TA sites (Himar1) 20 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 1 non-essential, 19 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 251.35. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 20 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 3 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance7.96 ppm · rank 2767/3519 (21.4th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. For most detected proteins, what the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists. This locus belongs to the PE/PPE family, whose long, low-complexity repeat domains carry few tryptic peptides usable for MS identification: median 5 peptides (7–30 aa, in-silico trypsin digest) per detected PE/PPE protein in this atlas, against 13 for the rest of the detected proteome (Mann-Whitney p < 10-30, n=103 vs n=3,388). A detection here can therefore rest on very few peptides: the existence claim still holds, but it is weaker than the same count would be outside this family.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length365 aa
Molecular weight37.1 kDa
Theoretical pI9.8
GRAVY0.337 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index84.5
Aromaticity0.085
Instability index31.7 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
PPEPF00823.26 3.6e-662–164 PPE family
PPE-SVPPF12484.14 4.7e-18282–361 PPE-SVP subfamily C-terminal region

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 72.6, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 72.6

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
5xfs-assembly1_B 1.00 0.96 0.46 0.95 62% 47% / 99% 4.8e-16 sig 5xfs-assembly1_B Crystal structure of PE8-PPE15 in complex with EspG5 from M. tuberculosis
4w4l-assembly1_B 1.00 0.90 0.45 0.90 35% 48% / 100% 2.1e-11 sig 4w4l-assembly1_B Crystal structure of EspG5 in complex with PE25 and PPE41 from the ESX-5 type VII secretion system of M. tuberculosis
6vj5-assembly1_B 1.00 0.90 0.45 0.90 35% 48% / 100% 4.6e-11 sig 6vj5-assembly1_B Structure of PE25-PPE41(A124L) in complex with EspG5 chaperone from the type VII (ESX-5) secretion system
6uuj-assembly2_E 1.00 0.87 0.40 0.87 41% 45% / 98% 2.6e-09 sig 6uuj-assembly2_E Structure of PE5-PPE4-EspG3 complex from the type VII (ESX-3) secretion system, space group P212121
6uuj-assembly3_H 1.00 0.86 0.40 0.86 41% 45% / 98% 4.0e-09 sig 6uuj-assembly3_H Structure of PE5-PPE4-EspG3 complex from the type VII (ESX-3) secretion system, space group P212121

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 72.6, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1786 (+ strand, 269 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)PE18 (+ strand, 78 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1836) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv1787 · Rv1788 · Rv1789 (coverage 32.97)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 17.85) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

PE/PPE family context (subfamily & T7SS secretion) PPE-SVP ESX-5

Secretioncis-encoded within its own T7SS gene cluster (ESX-5)
Cognate PE/PPE partner(s) in this T7SS cluster PE18 · PPE26 · PPE28 · PE19 · PPE29 · PPE27
Literature framing 2 paper(s) discuss this gene specifically as a vaccine/antigen/diagnostic candidate (PubMed, verified on text) — e.g. "Deciphering the functional roles of PE18 and PPE26 proteins in modulating Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis and immune response."; "DNA vaccine with discontinuous T-cell epitope insertions into HSP65 scaffold as a potential means to improve immunogenicity of multi-epitope Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine."

Subfamily: PE / PE_PGRS from the Mycobrowser gene name/product; PPE refined to PPE-MPTR / PPE-SVP / PPE-PPW when a dedicated Pfam domain is present (plain PPE otherwise) -- Ates 2020 defines this four-subfamily framework, and the PPE-MPTR mapping (Pfam "Pentapeptide_2") is corroborated gene-by-gene against the literature (PPE10, PPE13), not an invented rule. T7SS locus and secretion status derived from this atlas's own gene nomenclature (the eccA/B/C/D/E and mycP genes already named on the corresponding fiches), not a hard-coded coordinate table. Orphan PE/PPE genes are trans-secreted by ESX-5 (Abdallah et al. 2009). Part of P42 (2026-08-28/29).

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: PPE26 (PPE family protein PPE26), medium confidence (score 611, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). This partner is also a paralogue of this gene (STRING homology score 884), so the association may reflect shared ancestry rather than a shared pathway.

All 9 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1789 PPE26 paralog PPE family protein PPE26 634 611 ctx neighborhood:590
Rv1788 PE18 PE family protein PE18 865 606 ctx neighborhood:606 textmining:671
Rv1786 ferredoxin 453 453 ctx neighborhood:452
Rv1794 espG5 hypothetical protein 640 295 textmining:511
Rv2431c PE25 PE family protein PE25 659 155 textmining:613
Rv1791 PE19 PE family protein PE19 905 95 textmining:900
Rv1793 esxN ESAT-6 like protein EsxN 535 51 textmining:530
Rv3875 esxA ESAT-6 protein EsxA 464 47 textmining:462
Rv1818c PE_PGRS33 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS33 400 41 textmining:401

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): PPE family protein PPE25
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): PPE PF00823.26 (E=4e-66), PPE-SVP PF12484.14 (E=5e-18)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_177833.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — PPE (PF00823.26), PPE-SVP (PF12484.14)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG5651
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WI13 (SwissProt, reviewed; Inferred from homology)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 72.6)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 9 functional partner(s); context anchor PPE26
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • PE/PPE family context: subfamily from Mycobrowser nomenclature; T7SS locus derived from this atlas's own eccA/B/C/D/E and mycP gene names; orphan trans-secretion by ESX-5 (Abdallah et al. 2009, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06783.x)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv1787|PPE25
MDFGALPPEINSGRMYCGPGSGPMLAAAAAWDGVAVELGLAATGYASVIAELTGAPWVGAASLSMVAAATPYVAWLSQAAARAEQAGMQAAAAAAAYEAAFVMTVPPPVITANRVLVMTLIATNFFGQNSAAIAVAEAQYAEMWAQDAVAMYGYAAASASASRLIPFAAPPKTTNSAGVVAQVAAVAAMPGLLQRLSSAASVSWSNPNDWWLVRLLGSITPTERTTIVRLLGQSYFATGMAQFFASIAQQLTFGPGGTTAGSGGAWYPTPQFAGLGASRAVSASLARANKIGALSVPPSWVKTTALTESPVAHAVSANPTVGSSHGPHGLLRGLPLGSRITRRSGAFAHRYGFRHSVVARPPSAG