PPE5 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv0304c · MTBC0 - · 2204 aa · 366150–372764 H37Rv (-) · RefSeq YP_177714.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)PPE family protein PPE5
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)PPE family protein PPE5. Pfam: Pentapeptide_2 (PF01469.25).
Functional category (TubercuList)PE/PPE

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.

Named in the body of 28 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv0304c (6), PPE5 (22).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “PPE family protein PPE5”: nothing found. no abstract in PubMed contains this protein name in a mycobacterial context: the silence measured under the locus tag is confirmed under the protein name.

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered

Predicted disorder55% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 60.1
Disordered regions9 IDR(s), longest 292 aa [first 8 listed: 0-74, 260-480, 531-549, 696-988, 1079-1340, 1555-1577, 1662-1748, 1783-1964]

carries a substantial disordered region (1274/2204 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.06 (95% CI -0.63 to 3.89). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.308 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=45 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0312c · 99.5% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt Q6MX49 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt namePPE family protein PPE5

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category N Cell motility
eggNOG descriptionPentapeptide repeats (8 copies)
Orthologous groupCOG3210

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.568 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 24 synonymous, 40 missense, 1 nonsense, 3 frameshift
Disruption 4 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 11.03% of strains (15727) · convergent
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Bovis, Caprae_La2, L5, L6, L9, La4, Microti, Orygis_La3, Pinnipedii, Suricattae; union over all sites: 16 867 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:369764:GC:G · frameshift · 15 727 strains — fixed in 448 sub-clades of Bovis, Caprae_La2, L5, L6, L9, La4, Microti, Orygis_La3, Pinnipedii, Suricattae, totalling 15 379 strains — 96.1% of the 16 003 strains in the lineages named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.2.9 1716/1763, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.3 474/480, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.3.3 343/346, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.2 308/315, Bovis.2.1.2.2.2.1.3.2.2.2 249/249, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.1 241/244, …)
  • NC_000962.3:370799:GA:G · frameshift · 595 strains — fixed in 20 sub-clades of Bovis, totalling 591 strains — 4.5% of the 13 187 strains in the lineage named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.2.1 125/127, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.1 105/114, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.2.5 44/48, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.2.5.2.3 37/37, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.2.3 32/32, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.2.3.4.1.2.2.2.5.2.2.1.1 29/30, …)
  • NC_000962.3:369269:C:T · nonsense · 398 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:370613:GAT:G · frameshift · 147 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.238 · 12 consensus substitution(s)
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.238) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 0/53 (0%) · 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives
NOT MTBC-specific despite passing the strict presence filter: no hit at pident>=30 & qcov>=50 across the 53 non-MTBC genomes, BUT sub-threshold tblastn hit(s) exist (M_spongiae:64.7id/28cov;n=24;mtbap=4) — the gene is PRESENT BUT DIVERGENT in at least one non-MTBC Mycobacterium, not a genus-level innovation. Do not frame as MTBC-specific nor as a host-adaptation factor. Human non-homology, if needed, must be established directly (BLASTp vs human proteome), never inferred from this field.
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 137 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 137 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.964, mean read count 145.181818182. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 137 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 2 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance0.7 ppm · rank 3323/3519 (5.6th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. For most detected proteins, what the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists. This locus belongs to the PE/PPE family, whose long, low-complexity repeat domains carry few tryptic peptides usable for MS identification: median 5 peptides (7–30 aa, in-silico trypsin digest) per detected PE/PPE protein in this atlas, against 13 for the rest of the detected proteome (Mann-Whitney p < 10-30, n=103 vs n=3,388). A detection here can therefore rest on very few peptides: the existence claim still holds, but it is weaker than the same count would be outside this family.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length2204 aa
Molecular weight215.7 kDa
Theoretical pI4.05
GRAVY0.169 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index80.6
Aromaticity0.095
Instability index8.9 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Pentapeptide_2PF01469.25 3.5e-121545–1583 Pentapeptide repeats (8 copies)

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 60.1, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv0303 (+ strand, 7 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)PPE6 (- strand, 55 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: PPE5 · PPE6 — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0318) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

PE/PPE family context (subfamily & T7SS secretion) PPE

Secretionorphan (no T7SS apparatus gene nearby); trans-secreted by ESX-5 (Abdallah et al. 2009)

Subfamily: PE / PE_PGRS from the Mycobrowser gene name/product; PPE refined to PPE-MPTR / PPE-SVP / PPE-PPW when a dedicated Pfam domain is present (plain PPE otherwise) -- Ates 2020 defines this four-subfamily framework, and the PPE-MPTR mapping (Pfam "Pentapeptide_2") is corroborated gene-by-gene against the literature (PPE10, PPE13), not an invented rule. T7SS locus and secretion status derived from this atlas's own gene nomenclature (the eccA/B/C/D/E and mycP genes already named on the corresponding fiches), not a hard-coded coordinate table. Orphan PE/PPE genes are trans-secreted by ESX-5 (Abdallah et al. 2009). Part of P42 (2026-08-28/29).

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) Rv2989 (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: PPE6 (PPE family protein PPE6), high confidence (score 947, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). This partner is also a paralogue of this gene (STRING homology score 883), so the association may reflect shared ancestry rather than a shared pathway.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 134 partners at medium confidence (50 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 134 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0305c PPE6 paralog PPE family protein PPE6 950 947 ctx neighborhood:618 coexpression:853
Rv0355c PPE8 paralog PPE family protein PPE8 859 860 coexpression:850
Rv1548c PPE21 paralog PPE family protein PPE21 854 854 coexpression:800
Rv3533c PPE62 paralog PPE family protein PPE62 845 846 coexpression:796
Rv3903c cpnT hypothetical protein 781 782 ctx cooccurence:753
Rv2082 hypothetical protein 777 777 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv2209 integral membrane protein 775 775 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv0341 iniB isoniazid inducible protein IniB 775 775 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv2819c csm5 CRISPR type III-associated RAMP protein Csm5 782 774 ctx cooccurence:771
Rv1452c PE_PGRS28 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS28 774 774 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv2490c PE_PGRS43 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS43 774 774 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv3864 espE ESX-1 secretion-associated protein EspE 774 774 ctx cooccurence:771
Rv1651c PE_PGRS30 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS30 774 774 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv1004c membrane protein 774 774 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv0872c PE_PGRS15 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS15 773 773 ctx cooccurence:773

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): PPE family protein PPE5
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Pentapeptide_2 PF01469.25 (E=4e-12)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_177714.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Pentapeptide_2 (PF01469.25)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG3210
  • Curated reference: UniProt Q6MX49 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 134 functional partner(s); context anchor PPE6
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • PE/PPE family context: subfamily from Mycobrowser nomenclature; T7SS locus derived from this atlas's own eccA/B/C/D/E and mycP gene names; orphan trans-secretion by ESX-5 (Abdallah et al. 2009, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06783.x)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv0304c|PPE5
MNLVSTTSGMSGFLNVGALGSGVANVGNTISGIYNVGTSDLSTPAVNSGLANIGTNIAGLLRDGAGTAAINLGLANHGNLNVGFASLGGFNFGGATIGHNNVGIGNTGIFDVGLANLGSYNIGFGNLGDDNLGFGNFGSYNIGFGNVGNDNLGFANAGGGNIGFANTGSNNVGFGNTGSNNVGIGLTGNGQIGFGSFNSGSGNIGLFNSGSNNIGFFNSGSGNFGIANSGSFNTGIGNTGNTNTGLFNSGDVNTGAFNPGSFNTGSFNTGSFNTGGFNPGNTNTGYLNIGNYNTGIANTGDVDTGAFITGNYSNGLFLSGDYQGLVGLNLVIDMPLPISLGVNIPIDIPITASAGNITLMGVTIPPTGDIVLSSIAGQRAHFGPITIPNITVVGPTTTVAIGGPNTAITITGGGAIRIPLISIPAAPGFGNSTTNPSSGFFNTGAGGASGFGNFGGANSGFWNLASATSGASGLLNVGALGSGLANVGTTVSGFYNTSTSDLATPAFNSGLANISTSIAGLLRDSTGTMVLNLGLANHGTLNVGIANLGDYNIGFANLGSANFGSANIGGNNIGGANTGIFDIGLANLGSYNIGFGNFGDDNLGFGNLGSYNVGFGNLGNDNLGFANTGSNNIGFANTGSNNIGIGLTGDGQIGFGSLNSGSGNIGLFNSGSGNIGFFNSGNGNVGIGNTGTANFGLGNTGSTNTGFFNSGDVNTGIGNTGSFNTGSFNPGDSNTGDFNPGSYNTGLGNTGDVDTGAFISGSYSNGFLWSGNYQGLIGLHAALAIPEIALTFGVDIPIHIPINIDAGVVTLQGFSIVAAENNIDFTPIIIPTINITLPTAAITVGGPTTSIGITASAGIGSITIPIIDIPATSGFGNSTTSPSSGFFNSGAGSASGFLNVVAGASGISGYLNVGALGSGVTNVGHTVSGFYNASALDLVTPAFASGLMRDGMGTMTLNLGLANLGSNNAGFGNTGIFDVGVANLGNYNIGFGNFGDDNLGFANLGSYNIGVANTGSNNIGFANTGSNNIGIGLTGTGQIGIGALNSGSGNIGLFNSGDGNIGFFNSGTGNFGIGNTGTGNFGIGNSGSTSTGLFNSGDGNTGGFNPGNFNTGNFNTGSFNTGGFNAGNTNTGHFNTGNYNTGIANTGDVSTGAFISGNYSNGILWRGDYQGLIGYSYALTIPEIPAHLDVNIPIDIPITGSFTDLVVDNFTIPIIGFESFAFSFHIHTEPDIGPIIVPSFVLSVPTFAIAVGGPTTAINISATAGLGPITIPIIDIPAAPGIGNSTTSPSSGFFNTGAGTASGFGNVGGNTSGLWNLASAASGVSGLLNVGALGSGVANVGNTISGIYNTSPLDLGTPAFGSGLANIAGLLQGGAGTTILDLAGLGNLNVGLANLGGSNFGIGNTGIFNVGFANVGNHNIGLANLGNYSVGFANSGNYHIGIANTGSANIGFANTGSGNIGIGLTGTGQIGFGSFNSGSHNIGLFNSGDGNVGFFNSGTGNVGIGNTGTANFGIANSGSFNTGLGNTGSTNTGLFNPGNVNTGVGNTGSINTGSINTGSFNTGSTNTGSFNLGDHNTGSFNSGDYNTGYFNAGDYNTGVANTGNVNTGAFISGNYSNGFFWRGDYQGLIGLSTTITIPEIPYRYDLSVPIDIPITGTVVATTPNSFTIPGFQIRVLLGPAAVLVNEMIGPITIDVNQVIAIDSPIQQTISMVGTGGFGPIPIGISIGGTPGFGNSTTGPSSGFFHTGAGHVSGFGNFGAGNMSGSGNFGAGNSGFFNAGGLGNSGLLNFGALQSGLANLGNTISGVYNTSTLDLATPAFGSGIANIGANLAGLFLDNTGNLTLNFGVANQGGLNAGIGNLGSVNIGFVNTGDSNLGIGNLGDLNFGGVNIGGNNIGIANTGIFDIGLANLGSYNIGLANLGDDNLGFGNAGSYNIGFANFGSDNLGFANTGSYNIGFANTGNNNIGVGLTGNGQIGIGSLNSGSNNIGLFNSGSGNIGFFNSGTGNVGIFNTGTGNFGLANSGGFNTGIGNAGSTNTGVFNPGDLNTGSFNPGSFNTGGFNPGSGNTGYLNTGDYNTGVANTGDVDTGAFITGSYSNGFLVSGDYQGLIGLPLLGIPVTPGYFNLTGGPSSGFFNSGAGSVSGFVNSGAGLSGYLNTGALGSGVANVGNTISGWLNASALDLATPGFLSGIGNFGTNLAGFFRG