Rv3848 Family assigned · medium auto-curated
H37Rv Rv3848 · MTBC0 mtbc0_004081 ·
302 aa ·
4346436–4347344 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_218365.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | transmembrane protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | TMEM165/GDT1 family protein |
| Revised (this work) | TMEM165/GDT1 family protein. Pfam: GDT1 (PF01169.25). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.
Rv3848 (5), MSMEG_5329 (1).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.
PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 28% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 74.8 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 85 aa [217-302] |
carries a substantial disordered region (85/302 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 1.42 (95% CI -0.58 to 4.58). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.203 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=8 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb3878
· 99.7% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_5398
· 77.0% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_5329
· 49.7% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_003964
· 100.0% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P96229
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | GDT1 family protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | membrane |
| Orthologous group | COG2119 |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.801 · quasi-invariant (6 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 2 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 2 frameshift |
| Disruption | 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.85% of strains (1209) · clonal |
| Which clade carries which site (attribution) |
aucun site fixé dans un clade;
union over all sites: 1 507
strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
|
Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 2 consensus substitution(s) low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 0/53 (0%)
· 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives SENSITIVITY DOWNGRADE: a divergent homolog is detectable at relaxed thresholds (weak hit 80%/47%cov in M_decipiens — likely present but divergent); NOT a robust MTBC-specific innovation — present but divergent. The strict tblastn absence was a coverage/identity-threshold artefact. |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs) |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
9 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
9 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 150.666666667.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 9 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Read with some caution: only 9 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 9 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| altered fitness under Isoniazid (drug exposure) | +7.49 | 0.0 | disruption advantageous |
| fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) | -6.69 | 0.0 | required |
| altered fitness under Isoniazid (drug exposure) | +6.04 | 0.0 | disruption advantageous |
| altered fitness under acid stress (stress) | -3.94 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | +3.68 | 0.015 | disruption advantageous |
| altered fitness under acid stress in phosphate-citrate buffer (stress) | -3.20 | 0.0078 | required |
| altered fitness under nitrosative (NO) stress (stress) | -3.12 | 0.048 | required |
| differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) | +2.02 | 0.032 | disruption advantageous |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 8 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 3 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 0.4 ppm · rank 3381/3519 (3.9th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (7 TM helixes) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 7 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 302 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 32.0 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 10.0 |
| GRAVY | 0.414 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 108.3 |
| Aromaticity | 0.07 |
| Instability index | 50.3 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT1 | PF01169.25 | 3.1e-21 | 107–180 | Divalent cation/proton antiporter GDT1 |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 74.8, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv3847 (+ strand, 254 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | espR (+ strand, 264 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3963) |
exponential phase: operon of 7,
Rv3846 · Rv3847 · Rv3848 · Rv3849 · Rv3850 · Rv3851
(coverage 31.22)
stationary phase: operon of 3, Rv3847 · Rv3848
(coverage 210.6)
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (2 TF) |
Rv0081 (activates) · sirR (activates)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv3847 (hypothetical protein), medium confidence (score 536, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
All 4 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv3847 |
hypothetical protein | 536 | 536 ctx | neighborhood:533 |
Rv3849 espR |
ESX-1 transcriptional regulator EspR | 499 | 499 ctx | neighborhood:496 |
Rv1909c furA |
ferric uptake regulation protein FurA | 499 | 79 | textmining:479 |
Rv2137c dark |
hypothetical protein | 490 | 44 | textmining:489 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: transmembrane protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: TMEM165/GDT1 family protein
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): GDT1 PF01169.25 (E=3e-21)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218365.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — GDT1 (PF01169.25)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG2119 - Curated reference: UniProt P96229 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 74.8)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
4 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv3847 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_004081|Rv3848| MLAATLLSLGAVFLAELGDRSQLITMTYTLRYRWWVVLTGVAIAAFTVHGVAVAIGHFLGSTVPARPAACVSAIAFLIFAVWVWREDTASDSETSPTAAEPRLALFTVVSSFALAELGDKTTLATVTLASDHHWAGVWIGTTLGMILADGLAIGAGLLLHRRLPERLLQVLTGLLFLLFGLWLLFDDALGFRSVAIAVTAAVVLAAATTAVSVRVAQTRRRRPTAAATPEDDSTRPERSSVAPGHPGSILLPLPEVSLRGRRPPSGSPDERCADPGSKGGSRRISVGCWLPGVGRIRPTRSS
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv3848? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv3848