Rv3729 Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3729 · MTBC0 - · 776 aa · 4178285–4180615 H37Rv (+) · RefSeq NP_218246.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transferase
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)Transferase. Pfam: Zn_ribbon_HMPTM (PF23545.2), Radical_SAM (PF04055.28), Fer4_12 (PF13353.12), Methyltransf_23 (PF13489.13), Ubie_methyltran (PF01209.25), Methyltransf_31 (PF13847.13), Methyltransf_25 (PF13649.13), Methyltransf_11 (PF08241.19), Methyltransf_12 (PF08242.19).
Functional category (TubercuList)intermediary metabolism and respiration

Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.

Named in the body of 5 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv3729 (5).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Transcriptional start site (informative, coordinates unchanged)

Primary TSS at position 4178099 (+ strand), 150 bp 5'UTR. TSS-derived candidate start codon: 4178249 -- candidate only, not applied to this record's coordinates.

Genome-wide 5'-triphosphate-enriched RNA-seq TSS mapping (Cortes et al. 2013): informative context on transcript architecture only. reannotated_start_candidate is the authors' TSS-derived candidate start codon -- reported for information, NEVER applied to this atlas's start_mtbc0/end_mtbc0 coordinates (P19 MTBC0<->H37Rv anchoring). Row re-keyed to this locus by matching its genomic boundary against the H37Rv GFF3 (P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15), P49): the original ingestion (P16.23/phase135, 2026-08-17) trusted the source table's own gene-identity column, which was desynchronised from its own numeric columns on 547/651 checkable rows -- see P49 for the full diagnostic. A missing primary_tss here means this gene falls outside the 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset the source table covers, not an absence of transcription. Source: Cortes et al. 2013 (Cell Reports), Table S3 (TSS mapping and re-annotation of start codons), 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset of >4,000 genome-wide TSS -- row re-keyed to this locus by coordinate match (P49).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.11 (95% CI -0.37 to 3.64). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.280 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=32 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown; probably involved in cellular metabolism.
Mycobrowser EC 2.-.-.-

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3756 · 99.7% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_5410 · 29.4% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_003836 · 99.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O69696 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt namePossible transferase

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category Q Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
eggNOG description4Fe-4S single cluster domain
Orthologous groupCOG0500
KEGG orthology K06937

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 2.522 · diversifying/relaxed
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 14 missense, 1 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 3 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.73% of strains (1041) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Caprae_La2, L6, La4; union over all sites: 2 027 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:4179387:GTGGTCGGCGTCGGCGGTGCCAGGCACCGACACCA:G · frameshift · 1 041 strains — fixed in 58 sub-clades of L6, totalling 996 strains — 68.4% of the 1 457 strains in the lineage named (largest: L6.1.2.1.2.2.2.2 50/50, L6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.2 43/45, L6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.3 38/38, L6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2 38/38, L6.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1 38/38, L6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1 37/38, …)
  • NC_000962.3:4179200:G:A · nonsense · 719 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:4178294:AAT:A · frameshift · 267 strains — fixed in 8 sub-clades of Caprae_La2, La4, totalling 256 strains — 84.5% of the 303 strains in the lineages named (largest: Caprae_La2.1.2.2.2 78/78, Caprae_La2.2.2.2 53/53, Caprae_La2.1.2.1 42/42, Caprae_La2.2.2.1 38/38, La4.1 20/20, Caprae_La2.1.2.2.1 13/13, …)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.673 · 9 consensus substitution(s)
elevated dN/dS vs M. canettii (0.673) — relaxed or positive selection at deep divergence
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 15/53 (28%) · mean identity 55.1% · 3/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (15/53 NTM; in 3 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 31.2%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 29 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 29 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.966, mean read count 173.964285714. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 29 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 9 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance5.02 ppm · rank 2935/3519 (16.6th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length776 aa
Molecular weight84.1 kDa
Theoretical pI5.59
GRAVY-0.048 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index93.3
Aromaticity0.058
Instability index36.6 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Zn_ribbon_HMPTMPF23545.2 4.2e-172–45 HMPTM N-terminal zinc ribbon domain
Radical_SAMPF04055.28 6.8e-2195–259 Radical SAM superfamily
Fer4_12PF13353.12 4.0e-0599–183 4Fe-4S single cluster domain
Methyltransf_23PF13489.13 4.2e-10554–707 Methyltransferase domain
Ubie_methyltranPF01209.25 6.2e-09561–661 ubiE/COQ5 methyltransferase family
Methyltransf_31PF13847.13 7.9e-15564–679 Methyltransferase domain
Methyltransf_25PF13649.13 2.8e-19565–660 Methyltransferase domain
Methyltransf_11PF08241.19 7.1e-19567–661 Methyltransferase domain
Methyltransf_12PF08242.19 1.9e-10567–661 Methyltransferase domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 85.4, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 85.4

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
7tol-assembly1_A 1.00 0.80 0.51 0.80 28% 60% / 97% 4.1e-41 sig 7tol-assembly1_A X-ray crystal structure of glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether - macrocyclic archaeol synthase (GDGT-MAS) from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii with archaeal lipid, 5'deoxyadenosine, and methionine bound
7tom-assembly1_A 1.00 0.79 0.52 0.79 28% 60% / 96% 2.6e-40 sig 7tom-assembly1_A X-ray crystal structure of glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether - macrocyclic archaeol synthase (GDGT-MAS) from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii with bacterial lipid substrate analog, 5'deoxyadenosine, and methionine bound
5gm2-assembly2_L 1.00 0.84 0.27 0.75 23% 30% / 85% 3.6e-17 sig 5gm2-assembly2_L Crystal structure of methyltransferase TleD complexed with SAH and teleocidin A1
2o57-assembly2_D 1.00 0.84 0.27 0.74 23% 30% / 85% 6.7e-17 sig 2o57-assembly2_D Crystal Structure of a putative sarcosine dimethylglycine methyltransferase from Galdieria sulphuraria
2o57-assembly2_C 1.00 0.81 0.27 0.72 23% 30% / 85% 1.2e-16 sig 2o57-assembly2_C Crystal Structure of a putative sarcosine dimethylglycine methyltransferase from Galdieria sulphuraria

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 85.4, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv3728 (+ strand, 214 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv3730c (- strand, 64 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3833) expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 10.36)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

crp represses (high confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq (site de fixation CRP) ET RNA-seq du mutant delta-crp : log2FC(WT/delta-crp) = -0.86, padj = 0.0076

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv3728 (membrane protein), medium confidence (score 458, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 8 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3728 membrane protein 469 458 ctx neighborhood:455
Rv3727 oxidoreductase 441 441
Rv0213c methyltransferase 442 421
Rv1650 pheT phenylalanine--tRNA ligase subunit beta 415 415 ctx neighborhood:402
Rv3224 iron-regulated short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 492 144 textmining:432
Rv2541 hypothetical protein 870 42 textmining:870
Rv2012 hypothetical protein 803 42 textmining:803
Rv0991c hypothetical protein 641 42 textmining:641

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): transferase
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Zn_ribbon_HMPTM PF23545.2 (E=4e-17), Radical_SAM PF04055.28 (E=7e-21), Fer4_12 PF13353.12 (E=4e-05), Methyltransf_23 PF13489.13 (E=4e-10), Ubie_methyltran PF01209.25 (E=6e-09), Methyltransf_31 PF13847.13 (E=8e-15), Methyltransf_25 PF13649.13 (E=3e-19), Methyltransf_11 PF08241.19 (E=7e-19), Methyltransf_12 PF08242.19 (E=2e-10)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218246.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Zn_ribbon_HMPTM (PF23545.2), Radical_SAM (PF04055.28), Fer4_12 (PF13353.12), Methyltransf_23 (PF13489.13), Ubie_methyltran (PF01209.25), Methyltransf_31 (PF13847.13), Methyltransf_25 (PF13649.13), Methyltransf_11 (PF08241.19), Methyltransf_12 (PF08242.19)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0500
  • Curated reference: UniProt O69696 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 85.4)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 8 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv3728
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv3729|
MFVEYTKSICPVCKVVVDAQVNIRHDKVYLRKRCREHGSFEALVYGDAQMYLESARFNKPGTFPLRFQTEVRDGCPSDCGLCPDHKQHACLGLIEVNTHCNLDCPICFADSGHQPDGYAITAAQCERMLDTLVAAEGEPEVVMFSGGEPTIHKQLLEFVDAAQARPVKTVIINTNGIRLASDRRFVDQLATRNRPGHPVHIYLQFDGLDEATHRRIRGHDLRDVKQRALDNCAAAGLTVSLVAAVERGLNEHELGAVIRHGMAQPGVQPVVFQPVTHAGRHVQFDPLTRLTNSDIIACITAQLPEWFRPGDFFPVPCCFPSCRSITYLLTDGEHVVPIPRLLNVEDYLDYVSNRVIPDLAIREALENLWSASAVPGTDTMTAQLQRATAALNCAEGCGINLPEALTHLTDRVFAIVIQDFQDPYTLNVKQLMKCCVQQITPDGRLIPFCAYNSVGYREQVREQLTGVPVPDIVPNAIPLAGLLADAPHGSKQANTGGSIARLAGPTRGAPMALPPQQIKACCADAYSRDIVALLLGDSFHPGGATLTRRLADQLGLRSTGDPRRVADIAAGPGASARLLASDYGVAVDGVDISEINVKRAQAAVAQTGLTERVRFHLGDAESVPLPDDTFDALVCECAFCTFPDKNAAAQQFARILRPGGLAGITDVTVGDGGLPAELTPLAAWVACIADARTVTDYTDILEGAGLRTRHIESHDESLLDMIDRIDARITALHVAAPEILADNGIRHDSVRDFTALARAAVQTGRIGYTLMIAEKP