arsB1 Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2685 · MTBC0 - · 428 aa · 3001983–3003269 H37Rv (+) · RefSeq YP_177899.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)arsenic-transport integral membrane protein ArsB
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)Arsenic-transport integral membrane protein ArsB. Pfam: CitMHS (PF03600.23), ArsB (PF02040.21), NhaB (PF06450.19).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.

Named in the body of 7 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv2685 (2), arsB1 (5).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “transporter”: nothing found. 40 abstract(s) contain this protein name, but none can be attributed to THIS gene rather than to a homologue or a paralogue (the name carries no gene-specific discriminant and neither the locus tag nor the gene name is co-cited).

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.44 (95% CI -0.10 to 4.18). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.281 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=13 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionThought to be involved in transport of arsenical compounds across the membrane (export): arsenic resistance by an export mechanism. Responsible for the translocation of the substrate across the membrane.

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2704 · 99.5% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2029 · 79.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WPD7 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized transporter Rv2685

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized transporter Rv2685; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category P Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Preferred namearsB1
eggNOG descriptiontransport of arsenical compounds across the membrane (export) arsenic resistance by an export mechanism. responsible for the translocation of the substrate across the membrane
Orthologous groupCOG1055
KEGG orthology K03893

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 3 missense, 2 nonsense, 4 frameshift
Disruption 6 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 2.29% of strains (3259) · convergent
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — L4, L6, L_1, Orygis_La3; union over all sites: 7 225 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:3003083:GC:G · frameshift · 3 259 strains — fixed in 4 sub-clades of L4, totalling 3 280 strains — 6.0% of the 54 538 strains in the lineage named (largest: L4.2.1 1386/1397, L4.2.2 1178/1185, L4.2.1.1 507/510, L4.2.1.2 188/188)
  • NC_000962.3:3002594:C:T · nonsense · 2 396 strains — fixed in 3 sub-clades of L_1, totalling 375 strains — 9.6% of the 3 891 strains in the lineage named (largest: L_1.A.2 291/297, L_1.A.2.1 66/67, L_1.A.2.2 11/11)
  • NC_000962.3:3002370:T:TG · frameshift · 810 strains — fixed in 43 sub-clades of L6, totalling 761 strains — 52.2% of the 1 457 strains in the lineage named (largest: L6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.2 45/45, L6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.3 38/38, L6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2 38/38, L6.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1 38/38, L6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1 38/38, L6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.2.1 32/32, …)
  • NC_000962.3:3002467:CG:C · frameshift · 338 strains — fixed in 14 sub-clades of Orygis_La3, totalling 312 strains — 92.0% of the 339 strains in the lineage named (largest: Orygis_La3.2.2.2.2.2.2 104/104, Orygis_La3.2.2.2.2.2.2.2 61/61, Orygis_La3.2.2.2.1 36/37, Orygis_La3.2.2.2.2.2.2.1 25/25, Orygis_La3.2.1.2 14/14, Orygis_La3.2.1.1.1 11/11, …)
  • NC_000962.3:3002122:C:G · nonsense · 278 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:3002370:TG:T · frameshift · 144 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of L_1, totalling 36 strains — 0.9% of the 3 891 strains in the lineage named (largest: L_1.C.2.2.2.2.2 20/36)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.249 (low power) · 5 consensus substitution(s)
low power (5 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 35/53 (66%) · mean identity 75.4% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 35/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 52.5%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 15 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 15 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 58.6. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 15 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 8 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance1.14 ppm · rank 3256/3519 (7.5th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (14 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)14

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length428 aa
Molecular weight45.2 kDa
Theoretical pI5.73
GRAVY1.018 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index136.4
Aromaticity0.082
Instability index23.9 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
CitMHSPF03600.23 9.3e-8613–366 Citrate transporter
ArsBPF02040.21 3.0e-1520–422 Arsenical pump membrane protein
NhaBPF06450.19 7.7e-09144–386 Bacterial Na+/H+ antiporter B (NhaB)

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 92.2, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 92.2

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
6ol1-assembly1_B 1.00 0.79 0.79 0.77 20% 99% / 94% 6.6e-14 sig 6ol1-assembly1_B Structure of VcINDY in complex with Succinate
5uld-assembly2_D 1.00 0.79 0.79 0.76 20% 98% / 93% 5.8e-13 sig 5uld-assembly2_D Structure and function of the divalent anion/Na+ symporter from Vibrio cholerae and a humanized variant
8w6t-assembly1_B 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.76 17% 99% / 92% 3.5e-12 sig 8w6t-assembly1_B NaS1 in IN/OUT state
6okz-assembly2_A 1.00 0.76 0.76 0.75 20% 99% / 98% 3.8e-13 sig 6okz-assembly2_A Structure of VcINDY bound to Fumarate
8uvb-assembly1_A 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.76 16% 100% / 93% 5.0e-12 sig 8uvb-assembly1_A Structure of NaCT-PF4a complex

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 92.2, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)arsA (+ strand, 79 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2686c (- strand, 10 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2759) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv2683 · Rv2684 · Rv2685 (coverage 44.61)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2683 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 899, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 5 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2683 hypothetical protein 898 899 ctx neighborhood:606 cooccurence:728
Rv2684 arsA paralog arsenic-transport integral membrane protein ArsA 637 636 ctx neighborhood:577
Rv2682c dxs1 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase 420 421 ctx neighborhood:412
Rv0053 rpsF 30S ribosomal protein S6 409 410 coexpression:408
Rv2643 arsC arsenic-transport integral membrane protein ArsC 405 161

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): arsenic-transport integral membrane protein ArsB
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): CitMHS PF03600.23 (E=9e-86), ArsB PF02040.21 (E=3e-15), NhaB PF06450.19 (E=8e-09)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_177899.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — CitMHS (PF03600.23), ArsB (PF02040.21), NhaB (PF06450.19)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1055
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WPD7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 92.2)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 5 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2683
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv2685|arsB1
MSIIAITVFVAGYALIASDRVSKTRVALTCAAIMVGAGIVGSDDVFYSHEAGIDWDVIFLLLGMMIIVSVLRHTGVFEYVAIWAVKRANAAPLRIMILLVLVTALGSALLDNVTTVLLIAPVTLLVCDRLGVNSTPFLVAEVFASNVGGAATLVGDPPNIIIASRAGLTFNDFLIHMAPAVLVVMIALIGLLPWLLGSVTAEPDRVADVLSLNEREAIHDRGLLIKCGVVLVLVFAAFIAHPVLHIQPSLVALLGAGVLVRFSGLERSDYLSSVEWDTLLFFAGLFVMVGALVKTGVVEQLARAATELTGGNELLTVGLILGISAPVSGIIDNIPYVATMTPIVTELVAAMPGHVHPDTFWWALALSADFGGNLTAVAASANVVMLGIARRSGTPISFWKFTRKGAVVTAVSLVLSAVYLWLRYFVFG