Rv3239c Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3239c · MTBC0 mtbc0_003447 · 1048 aa · 3636600–3639746 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217756.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transmembrane transport protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationMFS transporter
Revised (this work)MFS transporter. Pfam: MFS_1 (PF07690.22), MFS_3 (PF05977.20), cNMP_binding (PF00027.36), Patatin (PF01734.28).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication discusses this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 1 record carries a M. tuberculosis context and 1 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 1-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Identification of Mutations Conferring Tryptanthrin Resistance to Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.3390/antibiotics10010006 2020

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder25% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 79.6
Disordered regions3 IDR(s), longest 186 aa [0-66, 160-346, 471-508]

carries a substantial disordered region (289/1048 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.43 (95% CI -1.92 to 3.65). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.308 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=21 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionUnknown, but seems involved in efflux system (probably sugar or drug transport).

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3267c · 99.9% identity
M. marinum MMAR_1306 · 80.0% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_4427 · 34.3% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_003339 · 99.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O05884 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Inferred from homology
UniProt nameProbable conserved transmembrane transport protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category E Amino acid transport and metabolism
G Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
P Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
T Signal transduction mechanisms
eggNOG descriptionMajor facilitator superfamily
Orthologous groupCOG0477
KEGG orthology K07001

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 1.143 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 4 synonymous, 12 missense, 0 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.19% of strains (277) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Bovis, L_1; union over all sites: 421 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:3615895:TGA:T · frameshift · 277 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of L_1, totalling 36 strains — 0.9% of the 3 891 strains in the lineage named (largest: L_1.C.2.2.2.2.2 36/36)
  • NC_000962.3:3616719:TA:T · frameshift · 144 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of Bovis, totalling 75 strains — 0.6% of the 13 187 strains in the lineage named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.4.3.2.2.1 70/75)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.262 · 27 consensus substitution(s)
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.262) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion; the dN/dS moves by more than 0.1 when the consensus threshold goes from 50% to 90%: treat it as indicative
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 20/53 (38%) · mean identity 66.0% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (20/53 NTM; in 4 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callGA · growth-advantage
What the call meansgrowth-advantage: insertions enriched
TA sites (Himar1) 56 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 56 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 205.017857143. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 56 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
Differential genetic requirements of clinical Mtb strain (ID=621) from East Asian lineage (compared to H37Rv control) (strain background) +1.040.0046 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 2 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance0.1 ppm · rank 3469/3519 (1.4th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (14 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)14

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length1048 aa
Molecular weight110.2 kDa
Theoretical pI9.51
GRAVY0.389 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index113.7
Aromaticity0.061
Instability index41.6 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
MFS_1PF07690.22 4.0e-3531–200 Major Facilitator Superfamily
MFS_3PF05977.20 3.7e-0776–200 Transmembrane secretion effector
cNMP_bindingPF00027.36 7.2e-21534–613 Cyclic nucleotide-binding domain
PatatinPF01734.28 1.9e-27790–947 Patatin-like phospholipase

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 79.6, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 79.6

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8ufd-assembly1_A 1.00 0.80 0.38 0.79 29% 43% / 97% 9.0e-19 sig 8ufd-assembly1_A Multidrug efflux pump MtEfpA bound with inhibitor BRD8000.3
8pnl-assembly1_A 1.00 0.71 0.36 0.71 25% 42% / 99% 6.1e-17 sig 8pnl-assembly1_A Outward-open conformation of a Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) transporter MHAS2168, a homologue of Rv1410 from M. tuberculosis, in complex with an alpaca nanobody
7y58-assembly1_A 1.00 0.72 0.37 0.71 24% 44% / 97% 3.3e-15 sig 7y58-assembly1_A CryoEM structure of QacA (D411N), an antibacterial efflux transporter from Staphylococcus aureus
4zow-assembly1_A 1.00 0.82 0.33 0.82 16% 42% / 98% 2.4e-10 sig 4zow-assembly1_A Crystal structure of E. coli multidrug transporter MdfA in complex with chloramphenicol
9b3m-assembly1_A 1.00 0.85 0.31 0.85 16% 42% / 96% 3.5e-09 sig 9b3m-assembly1_A NorA in inward-open conformation (NorA-BRIL fusion)

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 79.6, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv3238c (- strand, 58 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)secA1 (- strand, 78 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3337) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv3239c · Rv3240c · Rv3241c (coverage 85.55)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) Rv0081 (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: mddA (integral membrane protein), medium confidence (score 647, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 113 partners at medium confidence (7 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 113 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1358 exp (transferred) transcriptional regulator 718 650 experimental:440
Rv3238c mddA integral membrane protein 647 647 ctx neighborhood:644
Rv2438c nadE glutamine-dependent NAD(+) synthetase 658 627 ctx neighborhood:544
Rv3825c pks2 curated phthioceranic/hydroxyphthioceranic acid synthase 761 600 database:431 textmining:429
Rv2048c pks12 curated polyketide synthase 760 597 database:431 textmining:429
Rv1990A curated Rv1990A, len: 111 aa. Possible dehydrogenase (fragment), similar to N-terminal part of several dehydrogenases and hypothetical proteins, e.g 617 596 database:431
Rv2940c mas curated multifunctional mycocerosic acid synthase 758 595 database:431 textmining:429
Rv2933 ppsC curated phthiocerol synthesis polyketide synthase type I PpsC 758 594 database:431 textmining:429
Rv1527c pks5 curated polyketide synthase 758 594 database:431 textmining:429
Rv0386 exp (transferred) transcriptional regulator 672 593 experimental:440
Rv2488c exp (transferred) LuxR family transcriptional regulator 672 593 experimental:440
Rv3240c secA1 protein translocase subunit SecA 609 589 ctx neighborhood:583
Rv1004c membrane protein 604 578 ctx cooccurence:530
Rv3645 exp (transferred) transmembrane protein 614 557 experimental:419
Rv3396c guaA GMP synthase 595 545 ctx neighborhood:544

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: transmembrane transport protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: MFS transporter
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): MFS_1 PF07690.22 (E=4e-35), MFS_3 PF05977.20 (E=4e-07), cNMP_binding PF00027.36 (E=7e-21), Patatin PF01734.28 (E=2e-27)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217756.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — MFS_1 (PF07690.22), MFS_3 (PF05977.20), cNMP_binding (PF00027.36), Patatin (PF01734.28)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0477
  • Curated reference: UniProt O05884 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Inferred from homology)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 79.6)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 113 functional partner(s); context anchor mddA
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_003447|Rv3239c|
MHISLHGGKGFANLTRRRRPSSASVLLVAGFGAFLAFLDSTIVNIAFPDIQRSFPSYDIGSLSWILNGYNIVFAAFMVAAGRLADLLGRRRTFLSGVLVFTIASGLCAVAGSVEQLVAFRVLQGIGAAILVPASLALVVEGFDAARRAHAIGLWGAAAAIAAGLGPPIGGLLVEWAGWRWVLLVNVPLGIVAAIATKRMLVESRASGRRRMPDLRGALLLAVTLGLVTLGLVKGPDWGWLSVATVGSFLASVLTSVGFVHSSRSHPAPLVEPALLRSRSFVAGNLLTLVAAAGFYCYGLTHVLYLNYVWHYSLLKAGFAIAPAAVVAAVVAAALGRVAGRHGHRVIVLVGALVWAGSLVWYLQRVGSEPDFLRVWLPGQLLQGIGVGATLPVLSSAALAEVAKGGSYATSSAVVSTTRQLGAVLGVAVMVILIGKPEHGTAEEALRRGWAMAAICFIAVAVAAAVLGRTNRNPVQMPAPEPAIAPRLEPPIPQPAAAPIEHWAAGDADPLGNLPLFAGLDAATLAQLGEHVEDVELEAGCYLFHEGDPSDSLYVIRTGRVQVLQDSIVLKELGRGEVLGELGLLIDAPRSATVRALRDTKLVRLTKAQFDEIADHGALAALVKVLATRLREAPPPATDSTSPEVVVSVIGVSGDAPVPAVAAGLLTALSARLRAVDPGRVDRDGLDRAERVADKVVLHAAVEDAGWRDFCLRVADRIVLVAGDPNPQAARLPARARGADLVLAGPAASREHRRQWEELITPRSVHVVHYRRILENVRPLAARIAGRSIGLVLGGGGARGFAHLGVLDELERVGVTIDRFAGTSMGAVIAVFGACGMDAATADAYAYEYFIRHNPLSDYAFPVRGLVRGRRTLTLLEAAFGDRLVEELPKEFRCVSVDLLARRPVVHRRGRLVDVIGCSLRLPGIYPPQVYNGRLHVDGGVLDNLPVSTRASPDGPLIAVSIGLGGGGPGSARQDGSPKVPGIGDTLMRTMTIGSQRGADAALSLAQVVIRPDTGAVGLLEFHQIDAAREAGRVAAREAMPHIMALLNR