Rv2438A Family assigned · medium
H37Rv Rv2438A · MTBC0 - ·
92 aa ·
2736709–2736987 H37Rv
(+) ·
RefSeq YP_177671.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | — |
| Revised (this work) | Very likely not a protein-coding gene. This 92-codon ORF is superimposed on the essential NAD synthetase locus nadE (Rv2438c, opposite strand): 44% of it lies inside the nadE coding sequence and the remainder covers the nadE promoter and mapped transcription start site. A dedicated companion study shows that its essentiality and CRISPRi vulnerability are inherited from nadE rather than its own, that it has no transcription start site of its own, and that it is absent from every proteomic dataset in which nadE is detected. Reported as a dark-gene screen artefact rather than as an uncharacterised protein; the locus is retained here because the annotation still carries it, not because a product is expected. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
Curation note: 2026-08-25 (mtbc/Rv2438A project, manuscript submitted to the Journal of Microbiological Methods, MIMET-D-26-01013). Restores in the fiche header the conclusion that until now lived only in the `overlap` layer: this ORF is very likely not translated, and its screen signals are inherited from nadE. Verdict kept as `dark` because the vocabulary has no value for a non-coding locus, see the header of phase167.
Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). A full-text search does however find 3 paper(s) naming this gene in their body text — see the full-text field below. The gene remains dark on function, but it is not unmentioned, and this page no longer claims that it is.
Rv2438A, Mb2465
in Europe PMC full text (2026-09-08).
- The Forms of the Lectin Tff2 Differ in the Murine Stomach and Pancreas: Indications for Di (2023, open access)
- Molecular Alterations in the Stomach of Tff1-Deficient Mice: Early Steps in Antral (2020, open access)
- Role of VapBC12 Toxin-Antitoxin Locus in Cholesterol-Induced Mycobacterial Persistence. (2020, open access)
A full-text hit means the gene is NAMED in the body of a paper — very often in a genome-wide supplementary table — not that it is characterised. This field exists to retract an absence claim, never to assert a function. Read the hits before concluding anything. Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions. A hit whose full text is not open access is counted in n_unverifiable, not listed: the API cannot read it, so it is neither a proof of mention nor a proof of absence.
Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 0 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 0 — no mention in either source. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) dark by construction (IDR-orphan)
| Predicted disorder | 100% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 54.1 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 92 aa [0-92] |
both sequence (metapredict) and structure (low AlphaFold pLDDT) indicate little stable globular structure: this gene is dark BY CONSTRUCTION — there is no confident fold for structure/homology search to match, so its obscurity is expected, not a pipeline failure
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) antiparallel · 44 % of gene
| Neighbour | nadE (Rv2438c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 123 bp, 44 % of this gene's length |
antiparallel overlap: this gene may inherit essentiality/conservation signal from its neighbour through shared TA sites or promoter constraint, without any protein of its own being produced (cf. Rv2438A/nadE) Signals attributed to this gene (Tn-seq essentiality via shared TA sites, conservation via promoter constraint) should be cross-checked against the neighbour before being read as its own. P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Source: Guyeux C., "Auditing bacterial dark-gene screens for superimposed open reading frame artefacts: a multi-layer analysis of Rv2438A in Mycobacterium tuberculosis", accepted, Journal of Microbiological Methods, in press (2026); reproducibility bundle doi:10.5281/zenodo.21718307.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -4.56 (95% CI -7.19 to -1.90). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain (their own confidence call, not a p-value threshold). Its guide library did sample a range of repression strengths (str_span=0.640 on a 0-1 scale, thanks to at least one guide <=18 nt; n_guides=28 descriptive only), so the dose-response fit is not starved of titration the way most 'not certain' genes are -- the uncertainty here is the authors' own confidence call on the fit, not a design limitation of the guide library. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim without checking `certain` first.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Function unknown |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2465
· 98.9% identity |
|---|
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
Q79FD9
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Predicted
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Uncharacterized protein |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.397 · quasi-invariant (2 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 1 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 0/53 (0%)
· 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives P52.6n (2026-10-03): absent from all 53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes at strict thresholds, and the strict absence stands. The weak hit of the relaxed search (79% identity over 32% of the protein, residues 25-53, in M. decipiens) is not an ortholog: it is a shadow of the nadE (Rv2438c) start junction, read in another frame (antisense overlap of 123 nt in MTBC0), and it falls in the same proportion on nadE and on its promoter in both species (companion study, manuscript submitted). 'MTBC-specific' here means that no separate copy exists outside the MTBC; this ORF is very likely not translated (see the curation note and the overlap layer). |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria short ORF (92 aa) a shallow stratum may reflect homology-detection failure, not true youth absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs) |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) essential
| DeJesus 2017 call | ES · essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | essential: insertions absent across the whole ORF |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
5 in the ORF —
3 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
2 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.400,
mean read count 33.5.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 5 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 92 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 9.8 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 11.28 |
| GRAVY | -0.428 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 79.5 |
| Aromaticity | 0.033 |
| Instability index | 48.1 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 54.1, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | nadE (- strand, -123 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | proB (- strand, 129 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
Rv1049 (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: nadE (glutamine-dependent NAD(+) synthetase), medium confidence (score 572, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
All 1 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2438c nadE |
glutamine-dependent NAD(+) synthetase | 573 | 572 ctx | neighborhood:572 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein (92 aa)
- Overlap: 123 bp (44.1% of this ORF), antiparallel, inside nadE/Rv2438c; the remainder covers the nadE promoter and its mapped TSS (P20.1, from GFF3 coordinates)
- Transposon mutagenesis: 3 of 5 Himar1 sites lie within nadE; the 2 locus-specific sites flank the nadE promoter rather than reporting on an ORF of its own
- CRISPRi: no guide can target this ORF without also binding nadE, and the knockdown signature matches an indirect effect (weaker and noisier than nadE measured directly)
- Transcription: no independent TSS; the mapped nadE TSS lies inside this ORF
- Proteomics: absent from every dataset in which nadE is detected
- Cross-species: the M. decipiens homologue maps to the same nadE start junction, in matching proportion in both species
- Genome-wide context: 6 short overlapping uncharacterised loci among 3907 annotated genes, but only this one combines overlap, essentiality and proteomic non-detection
- (hand review, back-propagated from the companion project mtbc/Rv2438A)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_177671.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Curated reference: UniProt Q79FD9 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 29.5, very low)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
1 functional partner(s); context anchor
nadE - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Primary literature: Guyeux C (2026). Auditing bacterial dark-gene screens for superimposed open reading frame artefacts: a multi-layer analysis of Rv2438A in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Journal of Microbiological Methods (in press). doi:10.5281/zenodo.21718307
- Primary literature: Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam SZ, et al. (2018). A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core Journal of Molecular Biology. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>H37Rv|Rv2438A| MARTGHVQYRRGVGRRVTDGGVVSAGGNAHEPVLVGGVKVHRPFIVAQRRQNARITRRVSTLDTVESPALLADGGIDRRGDATDWAAADPGP
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2438A? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2438A