Rv0965c Still unknown · low

H37Rv Rv0965c · MTBC0 mtbc0_001031 · 139 aa · 1083993–1084412 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_215480.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand Rv0954 (Rv0954) — requalified: DUF5336 domain-containing protein Rv0954 Rv0955 (Rv0955) — family_assigned: DUF6350 family protein Rv0955 purN (Rv0956) — requalified: phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase purH (Rv0957) — requalified: bifunctional phosphoribosylaminoimidazolecarboxamide formylt purH Rv0958 (Rv0958) — family_assigned: ATP-binding protein Rv0958 Rv0959 (Rv0959) — family_assigned: VWA domain-containing protein Rv0959 vapC9 (Rv0960) — family_assigned: type II toxin-antitoxin system VapC family toxin Rv0961 (Rv0961) — dark: hypothetical protein lprP (Rv0962c) — family_assigned: LppA family lipoprotein Rv0965c (Rv0965c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv0966c (Rv0966c) — dark: DUF1707 domain-containing protein csoR (Rv0967) — requalified: copper-sensing transcriptional repressor CsoR Rv0968 (Rv0968) — family_assigned: DUF1490 family protein ctpV (Rv0969) — requalified: copper-translocating P-type ATPase ctpV Rv0970 (Rv0970) — family_assigned: DUF5134 domain-containing protein echA7 (Rv0971c) — family_assigned: enoyl-CoA hydratase family protein fadE12 (Rv0972c) — requalified: acyl-CoA dehydrogenase fadE12 accA2 (Rv0973c) — family_assigned: biotin carboxylase N-terminal domain-containing protein accA2 accD2 (Rv0974c) — family_assigned: acyl-CoA carboxylase subunit beta accD2 fadE13 (Rv0975c) — family_assigned: acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family protein fadE13 Rv0976c (Rv0976c) — family_assigned: acyclic terpene utilization AtuA family protein 1 076 kb 1 080 kb 1 084 kb 1 088 kb 1 092 kb 1 096 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationhypothetical protein
Revised (this work)Conserved hypothetical protein; predicted secreted (Sec signal peptide, DeepTMHMM). The predicted model adopts a small helical hairpin that superposes well on WXG100 EsxB structures (TM 0.82-0.91), but that resemblance does NOT support an ESX/WXG100 assignment: the sequence carries no WXG motif, the structural match is not significant in either search (E=0.11 on the ESMFold model, E=0.010 on the AlphaFold model), the gene lies outside any esx locus, and a predicted Sec signal peptide is incompatible with the type VII pathway, whose substrates are exported without one. Function unknown.
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Curation note: P51.2u (2026-09-19): the previous curation read a high TM-score against EsxB as an ESX/WXG100 family assignment. Re-read against the record's own layers, that claim is contradicted by a predicted Sec signal peptide and unsupported by sequence or significance. Fold resemblance is reported; family attribution is not.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.

Named in the body of 1 paper(s), though in no title or abstract. Searched as Rv0965c, MT0993, Mb0990c in Europe PMC full text (2026-09-23).

A full-text hit means the gene is NAMED in the body of a paper -- very often in a genome-wide supplementary table -- not that it is characterised. This field exists to retract an absence claim, never to assert a function. Read the hits before concluding anything. Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions. A hit whose full text is not open access is counted in n_unverifiable, not listed: the API cannot read it, so it is neither a proof of mention nor a proof of absence.

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.21 (95% CI -1.20 to 4.41). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.255 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0990c · 99.3% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001018 · 100.0% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WKM3 SwissProt · reviewed · Predicted
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv0965c

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv0965c; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

Orthologous group2AYPW

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.338 · quasi-invariant (4 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.297 · 16 consensus substitution(s) · 1 canettii-fixed disruption
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.297) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion; carries 1 M. canettii-clade-fixed disruptive substitution(s) (candidate lineage-specific pseudogenisation — cross-check the intra-MTBC pseudogene layer)
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 17/53 (32%) · mean identity 57.5% · 3/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (17/53 NTM; in 3 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 7 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 7 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 125.714285714. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 7 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatRead with some caution: only 7 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 7 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) signal peptide

Predictionpredicted secreted protein (signal peptide)
DeepTMHMM classSP

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length139 aa
Molecular weight14.5 kDa
Theoretical pI5.73
GRAVY-0.085 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index76.7
Aromaticity0.065
Instability index26.6 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).

Tentative domain (below the --cut_ga gathering threshold; a low-confidence homology lead, not a firm assignment): DUF2563 (PF10817.16), i-Evalue 2.4e-04, residues 85–124 — Protein of unknown function (DUF2563).

1 further sub-threshold hit(s) besides the best one above
Pfamaccessioni-Evalueresiduesdescription
Gp38_NPF21721.4 2.2e-01 67–76Phage tail fibre adhesin Gp38 N-terminal domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 79.5, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)

ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 86.8 (confident). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.

Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.

TargetProbTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
4j7k-assembly1_A 1.00 0.82 0.53 0.79 13% 62% / 96% 1.1e-01 4j7k-assembly1_A The crystal structure of a secreted protein EsxB (Mutant E54Q) from Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne
4j41-assembly2_D 1.00 0.86 0.54 0.85 14% 60% / 99% 1.4e-01 4j41-assembly2_D The crystal structure of a secreted protein EsxB (Mutant P67A) from Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne
4j10-assembly1_A 1.00 0.81 0.53 0.80 13% 63% / 99% 1.1e-01 4j10-assembly1_A The crystal structure of a secreted protein ESXB (SeMet-labeled) from Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne
4j41-assembly1_B 1.00 0.87 0.54 0.83 15% 59% / 95% 1.7e-01 4j41-assembly1_B The crystal structure of a secreted protein EsxB (Mutant P67A) from Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne
4j7k-assembly2_C 1.00 0.78 0.52 0.75 13% 63% / 96% 1.0e-01 4j7k-assembly2_C The crystal structure of a secreted protein EsxB (Mutant E54Q) from Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne
4j7k-assembly1_B 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.77 14% 57% / 85% 2.1e-01 4j7k-assembly1_B The crystal structure of a secreted protein EsxB (Mutant E54Q) from Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne
4j11-assembly1_B 1.00 0.88 0.53 0.76 14% 57% / 85% 2.2e-01 4j11-assembly1_B The crystal structure of a secreted protein ESXB (wild-type, in P21 space group) from Bacillus anthracis str. sterne
4j41-assembly3_E 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.87 15% 57% / 98% 2.0e-01 4j41-assembly3_E The crystal structure of a secreted protein EsxB (Mutant P67A) from Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv0964c (- strand, 99 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv0966c (- strand, 35 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv0965c · Rv0966c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0993) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv0965c · Rv0966c (coverage 40.5)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0963c (hypothetical protein), medium confidence (score 592, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.

All 4 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0966c dark hypothetical protein 718 718 ctx neighborhood:711
Rv0963c hypothetical protein 592 592 ctx neighborhood:592
Rv0964c hypothetical protein 588 588 ctx neighborhood:587
Rv0967 csoR copper-sensing transcriptional repressor CsoR 488 488 ctx neighborhood:488

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • MTBC0 PGAP product: hypothetical protein
  • Foldseek (ESMFold model): EsxB structures 4J7K/4J41/4J10, prob 1.00, TM 0.82-0.87, E=0.11-0.17 -- NOT significant
  • Foldseek (AlphaFold model): same EsxB structures, TM 0.83-0.91, E=0.010-0.012 -- still not significant
  • Sequence: no WXG motif (the defining sequence signature of the WXG100 family)
  • DeepTMHMM: signal peptide predicted -- Sec export, incompatible with ESX/T7SS secretion
  • Genomic context: operon with Rv0966c (DUF1707), outside any esx locus
  • (ESX/WXG100 attribution withdrawn on individual re-reading, P51.2u, 2026-09-19; what is observed is kept, what it does not license is removed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215480.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2AYPW
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WKM3 (SwissProt, reviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 86.8, confident)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 79.5)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 4 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv0963c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001031|Rv0965c|
MRVNRPQCARVPYSAESLVRVEASWYGRTLRAIPEVLSQVGYQQADHGESLLTSHHCCLGAAEGARPGWVGSSAGALSGLLDSWAEASTAHAARIGDHSYGMHLAAVGFAEMEEHNAAALAAVYPTGGGSARCDGVDVS