Rv2512a Still unknown · low auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2512a · MTBC0 - · 61 aa · 2829954–2830139 H37Rv (+) · RefSeq YP_009030041.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)Conserved hypothetical protein; no recognised domain. Function unknown. Foldseek best (non-significant) hit: 7jt2-assembly1_q 70S ribosome stalled on long mRNA with ArfB bound in (prob 0.03, TM 0.26).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) no title/abstract or full-text mention found

No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). This gene is genuinely unstudied: its darkness reflects absence of investigation, not failure of investigation.

Second-source check (tbmonitor): 0 paper(s) against 0 for the PubMed sweep — no mention in either source.

Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 0 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 0 — no mention in either source. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).

An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.

Why this gene is still unknown (classification, not failure) MICRO-ORF

The detectors cannot speak here. WALL OF MEASURABILITY. Below ~65 aa a protein cannot carry a full Pfam-A domain, profile-profile search has too little sequence to build a deep profile, and a TM-score around 0.6 against any small fold is ordinary rather than significant. Pocket detection is blind too: on PROVEN enzymes, only 1 of 26 under 200 aa reaches the P2Rank confidence threshold. The absence of a functional call here measures the detectors, not the protein.

Detector state length 61 aa · Pfam domain: none · confident AlphaFold model: no · significant structural hits: 0 · pocket detection: blind (protein below the detector's power) · MS: not detected
Existence vs functionNot MS-detected: neither existence nor function is settled here. A proteomics negative is weak evidence for short, hydrophobic or low-abundance proteins.
What would settle itBench, or a detector built for short proteins. Existence is often provable (MS); function is not inferable in silico with today's tools.

Read with care. A statement about what can be MEASURED on this gene today, not a claim that it has no function, and revisable: a gene enters or leaves this class as the layers change. It stays counted among the dark. phase117_hard_residue.py (P8-résidu-dur), 2026-08-10.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.01 (95% CI -8.85 to 9.51). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, pebble.rockefeller.edu).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain (their own confidence call, not a p-value threshold): the fit may rest on too few informative sgRNAs (n_guides=None) or an unstable dose-response curve; guide-level data to check the titration range directly (str_span) could not be matched to this locus. Atlas-wide, VI for 'certain=False' genes has a median near zero (no vulnerability signal) versus -6.76 for 'certain=True' genes -- do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim without checking `certain` first.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

Orthologous group2BCIJ

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 0/53 (0%) · 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives
absent from ALL 53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes tested (incl. the closest MTBAP relatives) — a candidate MTBC-specific genetic innovation / host-adaptation factor (confirm by synteny; rule out a short/low-complexity ORF and extreme divergence)
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

short ORF (61 aa) a shallow stratum may reflect homology-detection failure, not true youth
absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length61 aa
Molecular weight7.0 kDa
Theoretical pI8.61
GRAVY-0.567 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index75.2
Aromaticity0.066
Instability index48.3 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).

HHpred profile-profile (no confident hit): No confident hit (best 35.6%, an arenavirus envelope glycoprotein — implausible for a mycobacterial protein; E=0.6). The second, biologically apter hit (I-TevI zinc-finger, 24.7%) coincides with a cysteine-rich stretch in the sequence (C29-x-C31-...-C36 with flanking His27/His50), which is compatible with a possible metal/zinc-binding module; but at <25% probability, below the confident threshold and without fold convergence, this is a recorded lead, not an assignment. Remains dark. top hits 2L0Z_A arenavirus envelope glycoprotein G2 zinc-binding domain (35.6%, E=0.6), PF22635 I-TevI_ZnF zinc-finger endonuclease domain (24.7%, E=0.4), 6H8F TssA / 4LMQ SDF-1 / PF24044 DUF7353 / knottin (all 20-22%, E>=0.9, scattered). Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.

Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)

ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 46.4 (very low). Low-confidence model: the fold may be unreliable, so treat these structural hits with caution.

Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.

TargetProbTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
7jt2-assembly1_q 0.03 0.26 0.23 0.15 19% 84% / 43% 2.4e+00 7jt2-assembly1_q 70S ribosome stalled on long mRNA with ArfB bound in the A site
6spd-assembly1_Q 0.02 0.29 0.25 0.15 20% 84% / 42% 4.2e+00 6spd-assembly1_Q Pseudomonas aeruginosa 50s ribosome from a clinical isolate
9ax7-assembly1_p 0.01 0.26 0.23 0.15 19% 85% / 44% 6.3e+00 9ax7-assembly1_p 70S initiation complex (tRNA-fMet M1 + CUG start codon)
5afi-assembly1_Q 0.01 0.26 0.23 0.15 19% 84% / 43% 8.8e+00 5afi-assembly1_Q 2.9A Structure of E. coli ribosome-EF-TU complex by cs-corrected cryo-EM

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2512c (- strand, 150 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2513 (+ strand, 21 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2512a · Rv2513

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12)

This gene is absent from the STRING v12 proteome for M. tuberculosis H37Rv, so no interaction evidence could be queried for it at all — which is a statement about STRING's gene set, not about the protein.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): hypothetical protein
  • Foldseek best: 7jt2-assembly1_q 70S ribosome stalled on long mRNA with ArfB bound in the A site (prob 0.03, E=2e+00, TM=0.26)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_009030041.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2BCIJ
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 46.4, very low)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv2512a|
MLAAFRSHDAVLREFEKLGRYHQSTGHGCLCGKRNCATLSIIDSNQIYGHIDRMNRRDELG